Managing forensic DNA records in a divided world: the Belgian case

Purpose – This paper aims to describe the activity of managing records related to forensic DNA identification. First, it illustrates the fundamentals behind the technique of forensic DNA identification. Second, it explains the legal and institutional contexts in which it is used as well as the notion of DNA-based judicial records. Third, it provides details of records management issues that are met in practice. Design/methodology/approach – An interdisciplinary team reflects upon the practices surrounding the management of DNA-based records in the Belgian National DNA database during more than 10 years. Findings – The main problems with managing DNA-based judicial records stem from the existence of natural boundaries between the various stakeholders operating with or within the Belgian judicial system. Six types of issues have been found: non-automaticity and omission, error-prone and inefficient manual operations, electronic issues, results quality, useful reporting and incoherence and duplication. These...

[1]  E. Shapiro,et al.  DNA data banking: the dangerous erosion of privacy. , 1990, Cleveland state law review.

[2]  Bertrand Renard,et al.  Establishing networks in a forensic DNA database to gain operational and strategic intelligence , 2016, Security Journal.

[3]  Ann Rudinow Sætnan,et al.  “It all happened so slowly” – On controlling function creep in forensic DNA databases , 2009 .

[4]  Olivier Ribaux,et al.  Integrating forensic information in a crime intelligence database. , 2013, Forensic science international.

[5]  H. Machado,et al.  Prisoners' expectations of the national forensic DNA database: surveillance and reconfiguration of individual rights. , 2011, Forensic science international.

[6]  Duncan Taylor,et al.  Biological Basis for DNA Evidence , 2016 .

[7]  A. Jeffreys,et al.  Individual-specific ‘fingerprints’ of human DNA , 1985, Nature.

[8]  C. Aitken,et al.  Fundamentals of probability and statistical evidence in criminal proceedings , 2010 .

[9]  Robin T W Williams,et al.  Inclusiveness, Effectiveness and Intrusiveness: Issues in the Developing Uses of DNA Profiling in Support of Criminal Investigations , 2006, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics.

[10]  John Buckleton,et al.  DNA Intelligence Databases , 2004 .

[11]  Simson L. Garfinkel,et al.  PGP: Pretty Good Privacy , 1994 .

[12]  O. Ribaux,et al.  Intelligence-led crime scene processing. Part I: Forensic intelligence. , 2010, Forensic science international.

[13]  Mark A. Rothstein,et al.  The Expanding Use of DNA in Law Enforcement: What Role for Privacy? , 2006, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics.

[14]  Claude Roux,et al.  From Forensics to Forensic Science , 2012 .

[15]  M. Lammers,et al.  Are Arrested and Non-Arrested Serial Offenders Different? A Test of Spatial Offending Patterns Using DNA Found at Crime Scenes , 2014 .

[16]  Wim Bernasco,et al.  Are mobile offenders less likely to be caught? The influence of the geographical dispersion of serial offenders’ crime locations on their probability of arrest , 2013 .

[17]  C. McCartney.  The Dna Expansion Programme and Criminal Investigation , 2006 .

[18]  B. Prainsack,et al.  Performing the Union: the Prüm Decision and the European dream. , 2013, Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences.

[19]  B. Renard.  L'identification génétique et la discrétion des controverses scientifiques dans son usage par la justice pénale , 2013 .

[20]  Robin Williams,et al.  Ethical, Social and Policy Aspects of Forensic Genetics: A Systematic Review , 2014 .

[21]  Peter Goldschmidt,et al.  Paradigm shifts in recordkeeping responsibilities: implications for ISO 15489's implementation , 2012 .