Investigation of CdTe, GaAs, Se and Si as Sensor Materials for Mammography

Despite the benefits of mammography investigations, some studies have shown that X-ray exposure from the mammography screening itself can statistically cause breast cancer in a small fraction of women. Therefore, a dose reduction in mammography is desirable. At the same time, there is a demand for a higher spatial resolution in mammographic imaging. The most promising way to achieve these goals is the use of advanced photon-processing semiconductor X-ray detectors with optimum sensor materials. This study addresses the investigation of the optimum semiconductor sensor material for mammography in combination with the photon-processing detector Medipix3RX. The influence of K-shell fluorescence from the sensor material on the achievable contrast-to-noise ratio is investigated, as well as the attenuation efficiency. The three different sensor materials, CdTe, GaAs, and Si are studied, showing advances of CdTe-sensors for mammography. Furthermore, a comparison of the contrast-to-noise ratio between a clinical Se-detector and Medipix3RX detectors with Si- and CdTe-sensors is shown using a self-produced mammography phantom that is based on real human tissue.

[1]  P Baldelli,et al.  Clinical dose performance of full field digital mammography in a breast screening programme. , 2011, The British journal of radiology.

[2]  M. G. Bisogni,et al.  Characterization of a mammographic system based on single photon counting pixel arrays coupled to GaAs x-ray detectors. , 2009, Medical physics.

[3]  D. Dance.  PHYSICAL PRINCIPLES OF MAMMOGRAPHY , 2007 .

[4]  Kenneth C Young,et al.  Radiation doses received in the United Kingdom breast screening programme in 2010 to 2012. , 2016, The British journal of radiology.

[5]  Safa Kasap,et al.  Photoconductors for X-Ray Image Detectors , 2017 .

[6]  Tsutomu Yamakawa,et al.  A proposed new image display method with high contrast-to-noise ratio using energy resolved photon-counting mammography with a CdTe series detector , 2018, Medical Imaging.

[7]  Karla Kerlikowske,et al.  Radiation-Induced Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality From Digital Mammography Screening , 2016, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[8]  R. Hendrick,et al.  Radiation doses and cancer risks from breast imaging studies. , 2010, Radiology.

[9]  M. G. Bisogni,et al.  Low contrast imaging with a GaAs pixel digital detector , 1999, 1999 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record. 1999 Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.99CH37019).

[10]  Tuomas Poikela,et al.  Review of hybrid pixel detector readout ASICs for spectroscopic X-ray imaging , 2016 .

[11]  Franz Kainberger,et al.  Dear-Mama: A photon counting X-ray imaging project for medical applications , 2006 .

[12]  Jorge Racedo,et al.  Feasibility study of a TIMEPIX detector for mammography applications , 2017, Symposium on Medical Information Processing and Analysis.

[13]  R. Steadman,et al.  Status of Direct Conversion Detectors for Medical Imaging With X-Rays , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[14]  M. G. Bisogni,et al.  A Medipix2-based imaging system for digital mammography with silicon pixel detectors , 2003, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).

[15]  M. Yaffe,et al.  High-resolution pixel detectors for second generation digital mammography , 2003 .

[16]  Zhong Zhong,et al.  Improved image contrast of calcifications in breast tissue specimens using diffraction enhanced imaging , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  Kai Zoschke,et al.  Development of edgeless TSV X-ray detectors , 2016 .

[18]  M. Veale,et al.  Edge effects in a small pixel CdTe for X-ray imaging , 2013 .

[19]  A. Rodríguez-Ruiz,et al.  Evaluation of the technical performance of three different commercial digital breast tomosynthesis systems in the clinical environment. , 2016, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[20]  R. Plackett,et al.  Excalibur: A three million pixels photon counting area detector for coherent diffraction imaging based on the Medipix3 ASIC , 2012, 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[21]  P. Hunt,et al.  An Inexpensive and Easy Ultrasound Phantom , 2016, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[22]  Tadayui Takahashi,et al.  Recent progress in CdTe and CdZnTe detectors , 2001, astro-ph/0107398.

[23]  D. DeLong,et al.  Digital mammography: effects of reduced radiation dose on diagnostic performance. , 2007, Radiology.

[24]  Carlos A. Ávila,et al.  Construction of mammography phantoms with a 3D printer and tested with a TIMEPIX system , 2017, Symposium on Medical Information Processing and Analysis.

[25]  Rafael Ballabriga,et al.  Timepix, a 65k programmable pixel readout chip for arrival time, energy and/or photon counting measurements , 2007 .

[26]  M. Greuter,et al.  Exposure to low-dose radiation and the risk of breast cancer among women with a familial or genetic predisposition: a meta-analysis , 2010, European Radiology.

[27]  Akiko Ihori,et al.  Discrimination between normal breast tissue and tumor tissue using CdTe series detector developed for photon-counting mammography , 2016, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[29]  M. Fiederle,et al.  Optimization of Medipix-2 Threshold Masks for Spectroscopic X-Ray Imaging , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[30]  Daniel Vavrik,et al.  Comparison of single-photon counting and charge-integrating detectors for X-ray high-resolution imaging of small biological objects ☆ , 2009 .

[31]  Thomas Koenig,et al.  Performance of a Medipix3RX Spectroscopic Pixel Detector With a High Resistivity Gallium Arsenide Sensor , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[32]  Melissa A. Durand,et al.  Synthesized Mammography: Clinical Evidence, Appearance, and Implementation , 2018, Diagnostics.

[33]  Kerry T. Krugh,et al.  Microcalcification detectability for four mammographic detectors: flat-panel, CCD, CR, and screen/film). , 2002, Medical physics.

[34]  Thomas Mertelmeier,et al.  X-ray spectrum optimization of full-field digital mammography: simulation and phantom study. , 2006, Medical physics.

[35]  Chien‐Ming Wu,et al.  Direct-Conversion X-Ray Detector with 50-µm High-Gain Pixel Amplifiers for Low-X-Ray-Dose Digital Mammography , 2015 .

[36]  T. Holý,et al.  X-ray micro radiography using beam hardening correction , 2005, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2005.

[37]  Alfonso G. Taboada,et al.  Dose-independent near-ideal DQE of a 75 μm pixel GaAs photon-counting spectral detector for breast imaging , 2019, Medical Imaging.

[38]  E. Dieguez,et al.  Study of the Effects of Edge Morphology on Detector Performance by Leakage Current and Cathodoluminescence , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[39]  Michael Campbell,et al.  The Medipix3RX: a high resolution, zero dead-time pixel detector readout chip allowing spectroscopic imaging , 2013 .

[40]  Daniel Vavrik,et al.  Large area pixel detector WIDEPIX with full area sensitivity composed of 100 Timepix assemblies with edgeless sensors , 2014 .

[41]  M. Sahin,et al.  Measurement of K X-ray fluorescence cross-sections, fluorescence yields and intensity ratios for some elements in the atomic range 22 , 2007, Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine.

[42]  D. O'Leary,et al.  Can radiation dose in mammography be further reduced by increasing the image quality? , 2011, Breast Cancer Research.

[43]  M. G. Bisogni,et al.  A prototype for a mammographic head and related developments , 2004 .

[44]  S. Procz,et al.  Flatfield Correction Optimization for Energy Selective X-Ray Imaging With Medipix3 , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[45]  F. Thibault,et al.  Digital detectors for mammography: the technical challenges , 2004, European Radiology.

[46]  Martin J Yaffe,et al.  Detectors for digital mammography. , 2004, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[47]  J Marchal,et al.  Theoretical analysis of the effect of charge-sharing on the Detective Quantum Efficiency of single-photon counting segmented silicon detectors , 2010 .

[48]  J. Iwanczyk,et al.  Energy dispersive CdTe and CdZnTe detectors for spectral clinical CT and NDT applications. , 2015, Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research. Section A, Accelerators, spectrometers, detectors and associated equipment.

[49]  Claudio Lanzieri,et al.  A GaAs pixel detectors-based digital mammographic system: Performances and imaging tests results , 2007 .

[50]  Safa Kasap,et al.  Direct-conversion flat-panel X-ray image sensors for digital radiography , 2002, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[51]  D R Dance,et al.  Influence of anode/filter material and tube potential on contrast, signal-to-noise ratio and average absorbed dose in mammography: a Monte Carlo study. , 2000, The British journal of radiology.

[52]  H.-E. Nilsson,et al.  Monte Carlo simulation of charge sharing effects in silicon and GaAs photon-counting X-ray imaging detectors , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[53]  Evaluation of image performance of CZT detector for digital mammography : Monte Carlo simulation , 2007 .

[54]  Matthew C. Veale,et al.  High Energy Resolution Hyperspectral X-Ray Imaging for Low-Dose Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[55]  G. Anton,et al.  How good is better? A comparison between the Medipix1 and the Medipix2 chip using mammographic phantoms , 2004 .

[56]  Vaclav Kraus,et al.  FITPix ? fast interface for Timepix pixel detectors , 2011 .

[57]  MYTHEN CdTe: a new generation state-of-the-art X-ray imaging detector , 2016 .

[58]  B. Jansen,et al.  High-resolution 3D micro-CT imaging of breast microcalcifications: a preliminary analysis , 2014, BMC Cancer.