Data-driven Actuator Selection for Artificial Muscle-Powered Robots

Even though artificial muscles have gained popularity due to their compliant, flexible and compact properties, there currently does not exist an easy way of making informed decisions on the appropriate actuation strategy when designing a muscle-powered robot; thus limiting the transition of such technologies into broader applications. What’s more, when a new muscle actuation technology is developed, it is difficult to compare it against existing robot muscles. To accelerate the development of artificial muscle applications, we propose a data-driven approach for robot muscle actuator selection using Support Vector Machines (SVM). This first-of-its-kind method gives users insight into which actuators fit their specific needs and actuation performance criteria, making it possible for researchers and engineers with little to no prior knowledge of artificial muscles to focus on application design. It also provides a platform to benchmark existing, new or yet-to-be discovered artificial muscle technologies. We test our method on unseen existing robot muscle designs to prove its usability on real-world applications. We provide an open-access, web-searchable interface for easy access to our models that will additionally allow for the continuous contribution of new actuator data from groups around the world to enhance and expand these models.

[1]  John D Madden,et al.  Mobile Robots: Motor Challenges and Materials Solutions , 2007, Science.

[2]  R. Wood,et al.  Meshworm: A Peristaltic Soft Robot With Antagonistic Nickel Titanium Coil Actuators , 2013, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[3]  Martin Leary,et al.  A review of shape memory alloy research, applications and opportunities , 2014 .

[4]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  Modeling of Soft Fiber-Reinforced Bending Actuators , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[5]  Hod Lipson,et al.  Soft material for soft actuators , 2017, Nature Communications.

[6]  Nicholas Kellaris,et al.  Peano-HASEL actuators: Muscle-mimetic, electrohydraulic transducers that linearly contract on activation , 2018, Science Robotics.

[7]  Carlos Canudas-de-Wit,et al.  Friction compensation for an industrial hydraulic robot , 1999 .

[8]  Milind Pandit,et al.  Variable stiffness and recruitment using nylon actuators arranged in a pennate configuration , 2015, Smart Structures.

[9]  Kam K. Leang,et al.  3D-printed ionic polymer-metal composite soft crawling robot , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[10]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  Progress on "Pico" Air Vehicles , 2011, ISRR.

[11]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  Biologically-inspired locomotion of a 2g hexapod robot , 2010, 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[12]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  A tutorial on support vector regression , 2004, Stat. Comput..

[13]  Allison M. Okamura,et al.  Series pneumatic artificial muscles (sPAMs) and application to a soft continuum robot , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[14]  Radhika Nagpal,et al.  Design and control of a bio-inspired soft wearable robotic device for ankle–foot rehabilitation , 2014, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[15]  Rachel Z. Pytel,et al.  Artificial muscle technology: physical principles and naval prospects , 2004, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[16]  Na Li,et al.  New twist on artificial muscles , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  Fluid-driven origami-inspired artificial muscles , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Hugh M. Herr,et al.  New horizons for orthotic and prosthetic technology: artificial muscle for ambulation , 2004, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[19]  Michael C. Yip,et al.  High-performance robotic muscles from conductive nylon sewing thread , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[20]  Koji Ikuta,et al.  Shape memory alloy servo actuator system with electric resistance feedback and application for active endoscope , 1988, Proceedings. 1988 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[21]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  Robotic Artificial Muscles: Current Progress and Future Perspectives , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[22]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  Microrobot Design Using Fiber Reinforced Composites , 2008 .

[23]  Mihai Duduta,et al.  Multilayer Dielectric Elastomers for Fast, Programmable Actuation without Prestretch , 2016, Advanced materials.

[24]  Bertrand Tondu,et al.  What Is an Artificial Muscle? A Systemic Approach. , 2015 .

[25]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  Soft robotic glove for combined assistance and at-home rehabilitation , 2015, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[26]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  Probability Estimates for Multi-class Classification by Pairwise Coupling , 2003, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[27]  Allan Joshua Veale,et al.  Towards compliant and wearable robotic orthoses: A review of current and emerging actuator technologies. , 2016, Medical engineering & physics.

[28]  Septimiu E. Salcudean,et al.  Nonlinear control of hydraulic robots , 2001, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[29]  Carter S. Haines,et al.  Artificial Muscles from Fishing Line and Sewing Thread , 2014, Science.

[30]  Michael C. Yip,et al.  On the Control and Properties of Supercoiled Polymer Artificial Muscles , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.