Classroom Learning Environments and Students' Approaches to Learning

Four hundred and eighty-four students from two metropolitan secondary schools completed the Learning Process Questionnaire, the Individualised Classroom Environment Questionnaire and the Learner Self Concept scale. Relationships between perceptions of the classroom learning environment, approaches to learning and self concept as a learner were investigated. Gender and level of schooling (junior high versus senior high) differences were examined. Results showed Deep Approaches to learning were significantly related to classroom learning environments which were perceived to be highly personalised and to be encouraging active participation in the learning process and the use of investigative skills in learning activities. High learner self concept was positively associated with Deep Approaches to learning and with classrooms perceived as high in Personalisation. It was negatively associated with Surface Approaches to learning. Differences in perceptions of learning environments and approaches to learning in relation to gender and level of schooling were small. The implications of these findings are discussed and strategies for facilitating Deep Approaches to learning are referred to.

[1]  K. Lonka,et al.  Epistemologies, conceptions of learning, and study practices in medicine and psychology , 1996 .

[2]  J. Biggs Student Approaches to Learning and Studying , 1987 .

[3]  Discerning Views , 1991 .

[4]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[5]  B. Fraser,et al.  CONCEPTUALIZATION OF ENQUIRY-BASED OR OPEN CLASSROOM LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS , 1979 .

[6]  Carol S. Weinstein,et al.  Teacher Education Students' Preconceptions of Teaching , 1989 .

[7]  H. Waxman,et al.  Investigating Classroom and School Learning Environments: A Review of Recent Research and Developments in the Field. , 1991 .

[8]  Paul C. Burnett,et al.  Conventional versus confirmatory factor analysis : methods for validating the structure of existing scales , 1997 .

[9]  Elaine Martin,et al.  SCHOOL ENVIRONMENT AND SIXTH FORM PUPILS‘ APPROACHES TO LEARNING , 1989 .

[10]  Angela F. L. Wong,et al.  Science Laboratory Classroom Environments and Student Attitudes in Chemistry Classes in Singapore. , 1994 .

[11]  Richard deCharms,et al.  Enhancing motivation : change in the classroom , 1976 .

[12]  K. Trigwell,et al.  RELATING APPROACHES TO STUDY AND QUALITY OF LEARNING OUTCOMES AT THE COURSE LEVEL , 1991 .

[13]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Mature students in higher education: I. A literature survey on approaches to studying , 1994 .

[14]  David Watkins,et al.  THE LEARNING PROCESSES OF AUSTRALIAN UNIVERSITY STUDENTS: INVESTIGATIONS OF CONTEXTUAL AND PERSONOLOGICAL FACTORS , 1981 .

[15]  John A. Clarke,et al.  Helping students become better learners: a case study in teacher education , 1991 .

[16]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. , 1990 .

[17]  P. Ramsden Learning to Teach in Higher Education , 1991 .

[18]  Gillian M. Boulton-Lewis,et al.  Change in Knowledge of Learning and Teaching through Journal Writing , 1998 .

[19]  Walter Doyle,et al.  4: Paradigms for Research on Teacher Effectiveness , 1977 .

[20]  John Biggs,et al.  Approaches to the Enhancement of Tertiary Teaching , 1989 .

[21]  R. Ryan,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES Origins and Pawns in the Classroom: Self-Report and Projective Assessments of Individual Differences in Children's Perceptions , 1986 .

[22]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Gender Differences in the Experience of Higher Education: quantitative and qualitative approaches , 1991 .

[23]  Darrell L. Fisher,et al.  Monitoring constructivist classroom learning environments , 1997 .

[24]  D. Watkins,et al.  Classroom environment and approaches to learning: An investigation of the actual and preferred perceptions of Hong Kong secondary school students , 1994 .

[25]  R. M. Thorndike,et al.  Correlational Procedures for Research , 1979 .

[26]  Decision-making style and self-concept , 1991 .

[27]  E. Erikson Identity, youth, and crisis , 1968 .

[28]  Barry C. Dart A goal-mediational model of personal and environmental influences on tertiary students' learning strategy use , 1994 .

[29]  Barry J. Fraser,et al.  Twenty years of classroom climate work: progress and prospect , 1989 .

[30]  B. Fraser,et al.  A comparison of actual and preferred classroom environments as perceived by science teachers and students , 1983 .

[31]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Gender differences in responses to the Approaches to Studying Inventory , 1993 .

[32]  Locus of Control and College Students' Approaches to Learning , 1996 .

[33]  J. Biggs,et al.  The Process of Learning , 1981 .

[34]  Michael Prosser,et al.  Improving the quality of student learning: the influence of learning context and student approaches to learning on learning outcomes , 1991 .

[35]  G. Glass Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research1 , 1976 .

[36]  B. Fraser Science Learning Environments: Assessment, Effects and Determinants , 1998 .

[37]  Avi Hofstein,et al.  The Learning Environment of High School Students in Chemistry and Biology Laboratories. , 1996 .

[38]  J. Biggs What do inventories of students' learning processes really measure? A theoretical review and clarification. , 1993, The British journal of educational psychology.

[39]  N. Entwistle,et al.  EFFECTS OF ACADEMIC DEPARTMENTS ON STUDENTS' APPROACHES TO STUDYING , 1981 .

[40]  Kim-chow Catherine. Tang,et al.  Effects of different assessment procedures on tertiary students' approaches to studying , 1991 .