The Terms “Chronaxie” and “Rheobase” are 100 Years Old

“The excitability of a biological object cannot be considered as defined, if only one excitation threshold is determined. Such an isolated determination is not suited for the simplest and direct comparison whether, for instance, the excitability is augmented or diminished under influencing conditions. If it is stated that a simply applied stimulus has to be augmented or diminished, is this statement only valuable for this particular stimulation and cannot be applied to the general excitability of the object; and, indeed, another stimulus, different from the first in duration, may give a completely different result, even a variation in an inverse sense.”

[1]  F. Hebrank,et al.  Stimulation threshold comparison of time‐varying magnetic pulses with different waveforms , 2009, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[2]  H. A. Blair ON THE INTENSITY-TIME RELATIONS FOR STIMULATION BY ELECTRIC CURRENTS. I , 1932, The Journal of general physiology.

[3]  Werner Irnich,et al.  The Hyperbolic Strength–Duration Relationship of Defibrillation Threshold , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  W. Irnich Optimal Truncation of Defibrillation Pulses , 1995, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[5]  From Defibrillation Theory to Clinical Implications , 2010, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[6]  W Irnich,et al.  The Chronaxie Time and Its Practical Importance , 1980, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[7]  Werner Irnich Georges Weiss' Fundamental Law of Electrostimulation Is 100 Years Old , 2002, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[8]  G. Weiss Sur la possibilite de rendre comparables entre eux les appareils servant a l'excitation electrique. , 1990 .

[9]  L. Lapicque La chronaxie et ses applications physiologiques , 1938 .