DMT of multi-hop cooperative networks-Part I: K-Parallel-Path networks

We consider single-source, single-sink multi-hop relay networks, with slow-fading Rayleigh fading links and single- antenna relay nodes operating under the half-duplex constraint. While two hop relay networks have been studied in great detail in terms of the diversity-multiplexing tradeoff (DMT), few results are available for more general networks. In this two-part paper, we identify two families of networks that are multi-hop generalizations of the two hop network: if-Parallel-Path (KPP) networks and Layered networks. In the first part, we initially consider KPP networks, which can be viewed as the union of K node-disjoint parallel paths, each of length > 1. The results are then generalized to KPP(I) networks, which permit interference between paths and to KPP(D) networks, which possess a direct link from source to sink. We characterize the optimal DMT of KPP(D) networks with K ges 4, and KPP(I) networks with K ges 3. Along the way, we derive lower bounds for the DMT of triangular channel matrices, which are useful in DMT computation of various protocols. As a special case, the DMT of two-hop relay network without direct link is obtained. Two key implications of the results in the two-part paper are that the half-duplex constraint does not necessarily entail rate loss by a factor of two, as previously believed and that, simple AF protocols are often sufficient to attain the best possible DMT.

[1]  P. Vijay Kumar,et al.  D-MG tradeoff and optimal codes for a class of AF and DF cooperative communication protocols , 2009, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[2]  P. Vijay Kumar,et al.  Multi-hop Cooperative Wireless Networks: Diversity Multiplexing Tradeoff and Optimal Code Design , 2008, ArXiv.

[3]  Elza Erkip,et al.  Multiple-Antenna Cooperative Wireless Systems: A Diversity–Multiplexing Tradeoff Perspective , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[4]  Philip Schniter,et al.  On the achievable diversity-multiplexing tradeoff in half-duplex cooperative channels , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[5]  Jean-Claude Belfiore,et al.  Optimal Space-Time Codes for the MIMO Amplify-and-Forward Cooperative Channel , 2006 .

[6]  Alireza Bayesteh,et al.  Optimum Diversity-Multiplexing Tradeoff in the Multiple Relays Network , 2007, ArXiv.

[7]  Jean-Claude Belfiore,et al.  Diversity of MIMO Multihop Relay Channels , 2007, ArXiv.

[8]  P. Vijay Kumar,et al.  Explicit Space–Time Codes Achieving the Diversity–Multiplexing Gain Tradeoff , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[9]  Pramod Viswanath,et al.  Approximately universal codes over slow-fading channels , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[10]  Lizhong Zheng,et al.  Diversity and multiplexing: a fundamental tradeoff in multiple-antenna channels , 2003, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[11]  Babak Hassibi,et al.  Diversity-Multiplexing Gain Trade-off of a MIMO System with Relays , 2007, 2007 IEEE Information Theory Workshop on Information Theory for Wireless Networks.

[12]  Gregory W. Wornell,et al.  Distributed space-time-coded protocols for exploiting cooperative diversity in wireless networks , 2003, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[13]  N. Supérieure Towards the Optimal Amplify-and-Forward Cooperative Diversity Scheme , 2007 .

[14]  P. Vijay Kumar,et al.  DMT of multi-hop cooperative networks-Part II: Layered and multi-antenna networks , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory.

[15]  P. Vijay Kumar,et al.  Explicit, Minimum-Delay Space-Time Codes Achieving The Diversity-Multiplexing Gain Tradeo , 2004 .