An analysis of codon usage in mammals: Selection or mutation bias?

SummaryA new statistical test has been developed to detect selection on silent sites. This test compares the codon usage within a gene and thus does not require knowledge of which genes are under the greatest selection, that there exist common trends in codon usage across genes, or that genes have the same mutation pattern. It also controls for mutational biases that might be introduced by the adjacent bases. The test was applied to 62 mammalian sequences, the significant codon usage biases were detected in all three species examined (humans, rats, and mice). However, these biases appear not to be the consequence of selection, but of the first base pair in the codon influencing the mutation pattern at the third position.

[1]  M. Bulmer,et al.  Neighboring base effects on substitution rates in pseudogenes. , 1986, Molecular biology and evolution.

[2]  T. Ohta,et al.  On some principles governing molecular evolution. , 1974, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  T. Ikemura.  Correlation between the abundance of yeast transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in protein genes. Differences in synonymous codon choice patterns of yeast and Escherichia coli with reference to the abundance of isoaccepting transfer RNAs. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  Marcella Attimonelli,et al.  ACNUC - a portable retrieval system for nucleic acid sequence databases: logical and physical designs and usage , 1985, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[5]  M. Bulmer,et al.  Are codon usage patterns in unicellular organisms determined by selection‐mutation balance? , 1988 .

[6]  D C Shields,et al.  Synonymous codon usage in Bacillus subtilis reflects both translational selection and mutational biases. , 1987, Nucleic acids research.

[7]  Walter M. Fitch,et al.  Estimating the total number of nucleotide substitutions since the common ancestor of a pair of homologous genes: Comparison of several methods and three beta hemoglobin messenger RNA's , 1980, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[8]  D. Briggs,et al.  An Evolutionary Perspective , 2004, J. Decis. Syst..

[9]  M. Gouy,et al.  Codon usage in bacteria: correlation with gene expressivity. , 1982, Nucleic acids research.

[10]  J. Devereux,et al.  A comprehensive set of sequence analysis programs for the VAX , 1984, Nucleic Acids Res..

[11]  M. Kimura,et al.  The neutral theory of molecular evolution. , 1983, Scientific American.

[12]  M. Kimura.  Evolutionary Rate at the Molecular Level , 1968, Nature.

[13]  D. Lipman,et al.  Interaction of silent and replacement changes in eukaryotic coding sequences , 2005, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[14]  A. Klug,et al.  The bending of DNA in nucleosomes and its wider implications. , 1987, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[15]  G. Bernardi,et al.  Compositional patterns in vertebrate genomes: Conservation and change in evolution , 2005, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[16]  Wen-Hsiung Li,et al.  An evolutionary perspective on synonymous codon usage in unicellular organisms , 1986, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[17]  B. Clarke.  Darwinian evolution of proteins. , 1970, Science.

[18]  Wen-Hsiung Li,et al.  Nonrandomness of point mutation as reflected in nucleotide substitutions in pseudogenes and its evolutionary implications , 2005, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[19]  Wen-Hsiung Li,et al.  Mutation rates differ among regions of the mammalian genome , 1989, Nature.

[20]  W. G. Hill,et al.  Evolution and animal breeding : reviews on molecular and quantitative approaches in honour of Alan Robertson , 1989 .

[21]  S. Wright,et al.  Evolution and the Genetics of Populations: Volume 2, The Theory of Gene Frequencies , 1968 .

[22]  T. Miyata,et al.  Extraordinarily high evolutionary rate of pseudogenes: evidence for the presence of selective pressure against changes between synonymous codons. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  T. Ikemura.  Codon usage and tRNA content in unicellular and multicellular organisms. , 1985, Molecular biology and evolution.

[24]  P. Sharp.  Processes of genome evolution reflected by base frequency differences among Serratia marcescens genes , 1990, Molecular microbiology.

[25]  D C Shields,et al.  "Silent" sites in Drosophila genes are not neutral: evidence of selection among synonymous codons. , 1988, Molecular biology and evolution.

[26]  D C Shields,et al.  Chromosomal location and evolutionary rate variation in enterobacterial genes. , 1989, Science.

[27]  M. Bulmer.  The effect of context on synonymous codon usage in genes with low codon usage bias. , 1990, Nucleic acids research.

[28]  T. Ikemura.  Correlation between the abundance of Escherichia coli transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in its protein genes. , 1981, Journal of molecular biology.