Decentralized Charging Coordination of Large-Population PEVs Under a Hierarchical Structure

Centralized or decentralized charging schedules of large-scale PEVs coordinated by a system operator usually require significant management, computation and communication capabilities on the system. Alternatively in this chapter, it constructs a hierarchical model for the PEV charging coordination problems where a collection of agents are introduced between the system operator and individual vehicles, and proposes an off-line decentralized method for the constructed hierarchical optimization problems. Under the decentralized method, each PEV implements its best behavior with respect to a given local charging price curve set by its agent. Each agent submits the collected aggregated charging behaviors under this agent to the system operator who then updates the electricity generation price and broadcasts it to PEVs via agents. To reimburse the transaction operation costs on agents, the charging price on the PEVs under an agent comprises both the generation price broadcasted from the system operator and the operation price set by this agent. It is shown that, under certain conditions, the proposed dynamical procedure converges to the efficient (or socially optimal) solution. The proposed method under the hierarchical structure presents the advantage of the autonomy of the individual PEVs and the low computation and communication capability requirements on the system.

[1]  Zhong Fan,et al.  A Distributed Demand Response Algorithm and Its Application to PHEV Charging in Smart Grids , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[2]  G. Andersson,et al.  Demand Management of Grid Connected Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEV) , 2008, 2008 IEEE Energy 2030 Conference.

[3]  Frank Kelly,et al.  Rate control for communication networks: shadow prices, proportional fairness and stability , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[4]  Dimitri P. Bertsekas,et al.  Dynamic Programming and Optimal Control, Two Volume Set , 1995 .

[5]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Convex Optimization , 2004, Algorithms and Theory of Computation Handbook.

[6]  J. Driesen,et al.  The Impact of Charging Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles on a Residential Distribution Grid , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[7]  Zhiwei Xu,et al.  Hierarchical Coordinated Control of Plug-in Electric Vehicles Charging in Multifamily Dwellings , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[8]  Carl Binding,et al.  Planning electric-drive vehicle charging under constrained grid conditions , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Power System Technology.

[9]  Hongbin Sun,et al.  A New Real-Time Smart-Charging Method Considering Expected Electric Vehicle Fleet Connections , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[10]  M. Verbrugge,et al.  Cycle-life model for graphite-LiFePO 4 cells , 2011 .

[11]  Hosam K. Fathy,et al.  Plug-in hybrid electric vehicle charge pattern optimization for energy cost and battery longevity , 2011 .

[12]  Rahul Jain,et al.  Hierarchical Auction Mechanisms for Network Resource Allocation , 2012, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[13]  Gerard Ledwich,et al.  A Hierarchical Decomposition Approach for Coordinated Dispatch of Plug-in Electric Vehicles , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[14]  Ian A. Hiskens,et al.  Incentive-based coordinated charging control of plug-in electric vehicles at the distribution-transformer level , 2012, 2012 American Control Conference (ACC).

[15]  Ufuk Topcu,et al.  Optimal decentralized protocol for electric vehicle charging , 2013 .

[16]  Dan Wang,et al.  Hierarchical charging management strategy of plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles to provide regulation service , 2012, 2012 3rd IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe (ISGT Europe).

[17]  Kai Ding,et al.  Battery-Management System (BMS) and SOC Development for Electrical Vehicles , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.