Global emissions pathways under different socioeconomic scenarios for use in CMIP6: a dataset of harmonized emissions trajectories through the end of the century

Abstract. We present a suite of nine scenarios of future emissions trajectories of anthropogenic sources, a key deliverable of the ScenarioMIP experiment within CMIP6. Integrated assessment model results for 14 different emissions species and 13 emissions sectors are provided for each scenario with consistent transitions from the historical data used in CMIP6 to future trajectories using automated harmonization before being downscaled to provide higher emissions source spatial detail. We find that the scenarios span a wide range of end-of-century radiative forcing values, thus making this set of scenarios ideal for exploring a variety of warming pathways. The set of scenarios is bounded on the low end by a 1.9 W m−2 scenario, ideal for analyzing a world with end-of-century temperatures well below 2 ∘C, and on the high end by a 8.5 W m−2 scenario, resulting in an increase in warming of nearly 5 ∘C over pre-industrial levels. Between these two extremes, scenarios are provided such that differences between forcing outcomes provide statistically significant regional temperature outcomes to maximize their usefulness for downstream experiments within CMIP6. A wide range of scenario data products are provided for the CMIP6 scientific community including global, regional, and gridded emissions datasets.

[1]  Steven J. Smith,et al.  Gridded Emissions for CMIP6 , 2019 .

[2]  B. Stevens,et al.  First forcing estimates from the future CMIP6 scenarios of anthropogenic aerosol optical properties and an associated Twomey effect , 2019, Geoscientific Model Development.

[3]  P. Kyle,et al.  GCAM v5.1: representing the linkages between energy, water, land, climate, and economic systems , 2019, Geoscientific Model Development.

[4]  K. Riahi,et al.  First forcing estimates from the future CMIP6 scenarios of anthropogenic aerosol optical properties and an associated Twomey effect , 2018 .

[5]  P. Kyle,et al.  GCAM v5.1: Representing the linkages between energy, water, land, climate, and economic systems , 2018 .

[6]  Meng Li,et al.  Trends in China's anthropogenic emissions since 2010 as the consequence of clean air actions , 2018, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[7]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  A methodology and implementation of automated emissions harmonization for use in Integrated Assessment Models , 2018, Environ. Model. Softw..

[8]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Connecting regional aerosol emissions reductions to local and remote precipitation responses , 2018, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[9]  Tomoko Hasegawa,et al.  Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 °C , 2018, Nature Climate Change.

[10]  Johannes W. Kaiser,et al.  Historic global biomass burning emissions for CMIP6 (BB4CMIP) based on merging satellite observations with proxies and fire models (1750-2015) , 2017 .

[11]  Meng Li,et al.  Historical (1750–2014) anthropogenic emissions of reactive gases and aerosols from the Community Emissions Data System (CEDS) , 2017 .

[12]  Wolfgang Lutz,et al.  The human core of the shared socioeconomic pathways: Population scenarios by age, sex and level of education for all countries to 2100 , 2017, Global environmental change : human and policy dimensions.

[13]  Jean Chateau,et al.  Long-term economic growth projections in the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways , 2017 .

[14]  P. Kyle,et al.  The SSP4: A world of deepening inequality , 2017 .

[15]  M. Strubegger,et al.  The marker quantification of the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 2: A middle-of-the-road scenario for the 21st century , 2017 .

[16]  M. Kainuma,et al.  SSP3: AIM implementation of Shared Socioeconomic Pathways , 2017 .

[17]  B. O’Neill,et al.  Global urbanization projections for the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways , 2017 .

[18]  R. Kopp,et al.  Ch. 4: Climate Models, Scenarios, and Projections. Climate Science Special Report: Fourth National Climate Assessment, Volume I , 2017 .

[19]  K. Riahi,et al.  The roads ahead: Narratives for shared socioeconomic pathways describing world futures in the 21st century , 2017 .

[20]  K. Calvin,et al.  Future air pollution in the Shared Socio-economic Pathways , 2017 .

[21]  M. Strubegger,et al.  Shared Socio-Economic Pathways of the Energy Sector – Quantifying the Narratives , 2017 .

[22]  J. Eom,et al.  The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview , 2017 .

[23]  C. Müller,et al.  Energy, land-use and greenhouse gas emissions trajectories under a green growth paradigm , 2017 .

[24]  K. Calvin,et al.  Fossil-fueled development (SSP5): An energy and resource intensive scenario for the 21st century , 2017 .

[25]  P. Kyle,et al.  Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways , 2017 .

[26]  G. Myhre,et al.  Radiative forcing of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide: A significant revision of the methane radiative forcing , 2016 .

[27]  M. Rocha,et al.  The PRIMAP-hist national historical emissions time series , 2016 .

[28]  Jens Borken-Kleefeld,et al.  Global anthropogenic emissions of particulate matter including black carbon , 2016 .

[29]  Brian C. O'Neill,et al.  The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6 , 2016 .

[30]  J. Lamarque,et al.  AerChemMIP: quantifying the effects of chemistry and aerosols in CMIP6 , 2016 .

[31]  G. Janssens‑Maenhout,et al.  Forty years of improvements in European air quality: regional policy-industry interactions with global impacts , 2016 .

[32]  Veronika Eyring,et al.  Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization , 2015 .

[33]  D. Fahey,et al.  Future atmospheric abundances and climate forcings from scenarios of global and regional hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) emissions , 2015 .

[34]  Brian C. O'Neill,et al.  Sensitivity of regional climate to global temperature and forcing , 2015 .

[35]  T. Berntsen,et al.  Evaluating the climate and air quality impacts of short-lived pollutants , 2015 .

[36]  Michael F. Wehner,et al.  Ch. 2: Our Changing Climate. Climate Change Impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment , 2014 .

[37]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared climate policy assumptions , 2014, Climatic Change.

[38]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  A new scenario framework for Climate Change Research: scenario matrix architecture , 2014, Climatic Change.

[39]  M. Chin,et al.  Radiative forcing in the ACCMIP historical and future climate simulations , 2013 .

[40]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways , 2013, Climatic Change.

[41]  J. Lamarque,et al.  The Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP): overview and description of models, simulations and climate diagnostics , 2012 .

[42]  Michael J. Prather,et al.  Future methane, hydroxyl, and their uncertainties: key climate and emission parameters for future predictions , 2012 .

[43]  Karl E. Taylor,et al.  An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design , 2012 .

[44]  N. Nakicenovic,et al.  RCP 8.5—A scenario of comparatively high greenhouse gas emissions , 2011 .

[45]  K. Calvin,et al.  The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300 , 2011 .

[46]  A. Thomson,et al.  The representative concentration pathways: an overview , 2011 .

[47]  Joeri Rogelj,et al.  Discrepancies in historical emissions point to a wider 2020 gap between 2 °C benchmarks and aggregated national mitigation pledges , 2011 .

[48]  Toru Nozawa,et al.  Future changes in tropospheric ozone under Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs) , 2011 .

[49]  T. Wigley,et al.  Emulating coupled atmosphere-ocean and carbon cycle models with a simpler model, MAGICC6 - Part 1: Model description and calibration , 2011 .

[50]  W. Landman Climate change 2007: the physical science basis , 2010 .

[51]  John F. B. Mitchell,et al.  The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment , 2010, Nature.

[52]  P. Friedlingstein,et al.  The indirect global warming potential and global temperature change potential due to methane oxidation , 2009 .

[53]  P. Lucas,et al.  Downscaling drivers of global environmental change Enabling use of global SRES scenarios at the national and grid levels , 2007 .

[54]  Xiaoshi Xing,et al.  Downscaling and geo-spatial gridding of socio-economic projections from the IPCC Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (SRES) , 2004 .

[55]  Judith Gurney BP Statistical Review of World Energy , 1985 .

[56]  P. Ehrlich,et al.  IMPACT OF POPULATION GROWTH , 1971, Science.