Elasticity, Adhesion, and Tether Extrusion on Breast Cancer Cells Provide a Signature of Their Invasive Potential.

We use single-cell force spectroscopy to compare elasticity, adhesion, and tether extrusion on four breast cancer cell lines with an increasing invasive potential. We perform cell attachment/detachment experiments either on fibronectin or on another cell using an atomic force microscope. Our study on the membrane tether formation from cancer cells show that they are easier to extrude from aggressive invasive cells. Measured elastic modulus values confirm that more invasive cells are softer. Moreover, the adhesion force increases with the invasive potential. Our results provide a mechanical signature of breast cancer cells that correlates with their invasivity.

[1]  R. Hochmuth,et al.  Experimental Studies of Membrane Tethers Formed from Human Neutrophils , 2002, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  G. Glinsky,et al.  Apoptosis and metastasis: a superior resistance of metastatic cancer cells to programmed cell death , 1996 .

[3]  Claudia Tanja Mierke,et al.  Invasive cancer cell lines exhibit biomechanical properties that are distinct from their noninvasive counterparts , 2011 .

[4]  Richard Superfine,et al.  Mechanical stiffness grades metastatic potential in patient tumor cells and in cancer cell lines. , 2011, Cancer research.

[5]  Igor Sokolov,et al.  Quantitative study of the elastic modulus of loosely attached cells in AFM indentation experiments. , 2013, Biophysical journal.

[6]  C. Lim,et al.  AFM indentation study of breast cancer cells. , 2008, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[7]  Gerhard Christofori,et al.  Cell adhesion and signalling by cadherins and Ig-CAMs in cancer , 2004, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[8]  F. Marga,et al.  Multiple membrane tethers probed by atomic force microscopy. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[9]  L. Liotta,et al.  The significance of hematogenous tumor cell clumps in the metastatic process. , 1976, Cancer research.

[10]  Clemens M. Franz,et al.  Quantitative methods for analyzing cell-cell adhesion in development. , 2015, Developmental biology.

[11]  M. Rostami,et al.  Atomic force microscope-based single cell force spectroscopy of breast cancer cell lines: an approach for evaluating cellular invasion. , 2014, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  Byungkyu Kim,et al.  Cell Stiffness Is a Biomarker of the Metastatic Potential of Ovarian Cancer Cells , 2012, PloS one.

[13]  R. Hazan,et al.  N-cadherin promotes adhesion between invasive breast cancer cells and the stroma. , 1997, Cell adhesion and communication.

[14]  Anna V. Taubenberger,et al.  TPA primes α2β1 integrins for cell adhesion , 2008, FEBS letters.

[15]  Stefan Schinkinger,et al.  Optical deformability as an inherent cell marker for testing malignant transformation and metastatic competence. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[16]  Frank Jülicher,et al.  Formation and interaction of membrane tubes. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[17]  Daniel J. Muller,et al.  Single-cell force spectroscopy , 2008, Journal of Cell Science.

[18]  F. Schmitt,et al.  Expression of p 120-catenin isoforms correlates with genomic and transcriptional phenotype of breast cancer cell lines , 2014 .

[19]  Subra Suresh,et al.  Biomechanics and biophysics of cancer cells. , 2007, Acta biomaterialia.

[20]  Kuo-Kang Liu,et al.  Quantitative investigation of calcimimetic R568 on beta cell adhesion and mechanics using AFM single‐cell force spectroscopy , 2014, FEBS letters.

[21]  Stephanie Alexander,et al.  Cancer Invasion and the Microenvironment: Plasticity and Reciprocity , 2011, Cell.

[22]  F. Schmitt,et al.  Expression of p120-Catenin Isoforms Correlates with Genomic and Transcriptional Phenotype of Breast Cancer Cell Lines , 2007, Cellular oncology : the official journal of the International Society for Cellular Oncology.

[23]  Erik Sahai,et al.  Localised and reversible TGFβ signalling switches breast cancer cells from cohesive to single cell motility , 2009, Nature Cell Biology.

[24]  M. Lekka,et al.  Cancer cell recognition--mechanical phenotype. , 2012, Micron.

[25]  Jens Friedrichs,et al.  Stimulated single‐cell force spectroscopy to quantify cell adhesion receptor crosstalk , 2010, Proteomics.

[26]  I. Fidler,et al.  Characterization of the invasive and metastatic phenotype in human renal cell carcinoma , 1991, Clinical & Experimental Metastasis.

[27]  Sanjay Kumar,et al.  Mechanics, malignancy, and metastasis: The force journey of a tumor cell , 2009, Cancer and Metastasis Reviews.

[28]  Carsten Werner,et al.  A practical guide to quantify cell adhesion using single-cell force spectroscopy. , 2013, Methods.

[29]  Daniel J Müller,et al.  Force probing surfaces of living cells to molecular resolution. , 2009, Nature chemical biology.

[30]  Michael P. Sheetz,et al.  Cell control by membrane–cytoskeleton adhesion , 2001, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[31]  J. Rao,et al.  Nanomechanical analysis of cells from cancer patients. , 2007, Nature nanotechnology.