Assessment of genetically modified soybean MON 87751 for food and feed uses under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2014‐121)

Abstract Soybean MON 87751 was developed through Agrobacterium tumefaciens‐mediated transformation to provide protection certain specific lepidopteran pests by the expression of the Cry1A.105 and Cry2Ab2 proteins derived from Bacillus thuringiensis. The molecular characterisation data and bioinformatic analyses did not identify issues requiring assessment for food and feed safety. None of the compositional, agronomic and phenotypic differences identified between soybean MON 87751 and the conventional counterpart required further assessment. The GMO Panel did not identify safety concerns regarding the toxicity and allergenicity of the Cry1A.105 and Cry2Ab2 proteins as expressed in soybean MON 87751, and found no evidence that the genetic modification might significantly change the overall allergenicity of soybean MON 87751. The nutritional impact of soybean MON 87751‐derived food and feed is expected to be the same as those derived from the conventional counterpart and non‐GM commercial reference varieties. The GMO Panel concludes that soybean MON 87751, as described in this application, is nutritionally equivalent to and as safe as the conventional counterpart and the non‐GM soybean reference varieties tested, and no post‐market monitoring of food and feed is considered necessary. In the case of accidental release of viable soybean MON 87751 seeds into the environment, soybean MON 87751 would not raise environmental safety concerns. The post‐market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of soybean MON 87751. In conclusion, soybean MON 87751, as described in this application, is as safe as its conventional counterpart and the tested non‐GM soybean reference varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.

[1]  Julie Glanville,et al.  Explanatory note on literature searching conducted in the context of GMO applications for (renewed) market authorisation and annual post‐market environmental monitoring reports on GMOs authorised in the EU market , 2017, EFSA Supporting Publications.

[2]  C. Mills,et al.  Assessment of endogenous allergenicity of genetically modified plants exemplified by soybean - Where do we stand? , 2017, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[3]  A. Birch,et al.  Scientific Opinion on an application by Dow AgroSciences (EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2013‐116) for placing on the market of genetically modified insect‐resistant soybean DAS‐81419‐2 for food and feed uses, import and processing under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 , 2018 .

[4]  F. Visioli Scientific opinion on application (EFSA-GMO-NL-2011-96) for the placing on the market of genetically modified insect-resistant and herbicide-tolerant cotton GHB119, for food and feed uses, import and processing under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Baye , 2016 .

[5]  J. Wal,et al.  Endogenous allergens and compositional analysis in the allergenicity assessment of genetically modified plants. , 2013, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[6]  Efsa Panel on Dietetic Products Scientific Opinion on Dietary Reference Values for iodine. , 2014 .

[7]  Efsa Panel on Dietetic Products,et al.  Scientific Opinion on Dietary Reference Values for water , 2010 .

[8]  S. Virtanen,et al.  Dietary exposure assessments for children in europe (the EXPOCHI project): rationale, methods and design , 2011, Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique.

[9]  Antoine Messéan,et al.  Guidance on the Post-Market Environmental Monitoring (PMEM) ofgenetically modified plants , 2011 .

[10]  C. Leclercq,et al.  Methodological characteristics of the national dietary surveys carried out in the European Union as included in the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) Comprehensive European Food Consumption Database , 2011, Food additives & contaminants. Part A, Chemistry, analysis, control, exposure & risk assessment.

[11]  H. Kuiper,et al.  Guidance for risk assessment of food and feed from genetically modified plants , 2011 .

[12]  C. Leclercq,et al.  Guidance of EFSA: Use of the EFSA Comprehensive European Food Consumption Database in exposure assessment , 2011 .

[13]  H. Kuiper,et al.  Scientific Opinion on the assessment of allergenicity of GM plants andmicroorganisms and derived food and feed , 2010 .

[14]  Gábor L. Lövei,et al.  Application of Systematic Review Methodology to Food and Feed Safety Assessments to Support Decision Making , 2010 .

[15]  Antoine Messéan,et al.  Guidance on the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants , 2010 .

[16]  B. Tinland,et al.  General Surveillance for Import and Processing: the EuropaBio approach , 2009, Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit.

[17]  Wilfried Wackernagel,et al.  Double illegitimate recombination events integrate DNA segments through two different mechanisms during natural transformation of Acinetobacter baylyi , 2008, Molecular microbiology.

[18]  Joachim Schiemann,et al.  Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms , 2008 .

[19]  B. Tinland,et al.  General Surveillance: Roles and Responsibilities The Industry View , 2007, Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit.

[20]  E. Rech,et al.  Gene flow from transgenic to nontransgenic soybean plants in the Cerrado region of Brazil. , 2007, Genetics and molecular research : GMR.

[21]  Kazuhito Matsuo,et al.  Gene flow from GM glyphosate-tolerant to conventional soybeans under field conditions in Japan. , 2006, Environmental biosafety research.

[22]  J. Gressel,et al.  Crop ferality and volunteerism , 2005 .

[23]  Robert L. Paris,et al.  Soybean natural cross-pollination rates under field conditions. , 2003, Environmental biosafety research.

[24]  Vázquez,et al.  Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ac Protoxin is a Potent Systemic and Mucosal Adjuvant , 1999, Scandinavian journal of immunology.

[25]  C. E. Caviness,et al.  Natural Cross‐Pollination of Twelve Soybean Cultivars in Arkansas , 1994 .

[26]  G. Gumisiriza Factors that influence outcrossing in soybean , 1978 .

[27]  C. E. Caviness Estimates of Natural Crosspollination in Jackson Soybeans in Arkansas1 , 1966 .