Smaller & Sooner: Exploiting High Magnetic Fields from New Superconductors for a More Attractive Fusion Energy Development Path

The current fusion energy development path, based on large volume moderate magnetic B field devices is proving to be slow and expensive. A modest development effort in exploiting new superconductor magnet technology development, and accompanying plasma physics research at high-B, could open up a viable and attractive path for fusion energy development. This path would feature smaller volume, fusion capable devices that could be built more quickly than low-to-moderate field designs based on conventional superconductors. Fusion’s worldwide development could be accelerated by using several small, flexible devices rather than relying solely on a single, very large device. These would be used to obtain the acknowledged science and technology knowledge necessary for fusion energy beyond achievement of high gain. Such a scenario would also permit the testing of multiple confinement configurations while distributing technical and scientific risk among smaller devices. Higher field and small size also allows operation away from well-known operational limits for plasma pressure, density and current. The advantages of this path have been long recognized—earlier US plans for burning plasma experiments (compact ignition tokamak, burning plasma experiment, fusion ignition research experiment) featured compact high-field designs, but these were necessarily pulsed due to the use of copper coils. Underpinning this new approach is the recent industrial maturity of high-temperature, high-field superconductor tapes that would offer a truly “game changing” opportunity for magnetic fusion when developed into large-scale coils. The superconductor tape form and higher operating temperatures also open up the possibility of demountable superconducting magnets in a fusion system, providing a modularity that vastly improves simplicity in the construction, maintenance, and upgrade of the coils and the internal nuclear engineering components required for fusion’s development. Our conclusion is that while tradeoffs exist in design choices, for example coil, cost and stress limits versus size, the potential physics and technology advantages of high-field superconductors are attractive and they should be vigorously pursued for magnetic fusion’s development.

[1]  M. Hoenig,et al.  Dense supercritical-helium cooled superconductors for large high field stabilized magnets , 1975 .

[2]  S T Wu,et al.  The Superconducting Magnets for EAST Tokamak , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[3]  V. Selvamanickam,et al.  Correlation between in-field critical currents in Zr-added (Gd, Y)Ba2Cu3Ox superconducting tapes at 30 and 77 K , 2014 .

[4]  P. Cochat,et al.  Et al , 2008, Archives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie.

[5]  L. Bromberg,et al.  Options for the use of high temperature superconductor in tokamak fusion reactor designs , 2001 .

[6]  J. Contributors,et al.  Scaling of the tokamak near the scrape-off layer H-mode power width and implications for ITER , 2013 .

[7]  D. Larbalestier,et al.  High-Tc superconducting materials for electric power applications , 2001, Nature.

[8]  K. S. Lee,et al.  Status of the KSTAR superconducting magnet system development , 2003 .

[9]  P. T. Bonoli,et al.  Vulcan: A steady-state tokamak for reactor-relevant plasma–material interaction science , 2012 .

[10]  D. Elder,et al.  Constraining the divertor heat width in ITER , 2013 .

[11]  Alfredo Pironti,et al.  New developments, plasma physics regimes and issues for the Ignitor experiment , 2013 .

[12]  A. Werner,et al.  Construction of Wendelstein 7-X - Engineering a steady state stellarator , 2009, 2009 23rd IEEE/NPSS Symposium on Fusion Engineering.

[13]  Internal Quench of Superconducting Magnets by the Use of AC Fields , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[14]  R. D. Stambaugh,et al.  A fusion development facility on the critical path to fusion energy , 2011 .

[15]  P. Bonoli,et al.  The lower hybrid current drive system for steady-state operation of the Vulcan tokamak conceptual design , 2012 .

[16]  J. Kinsey,et al.  Access to sustained high-beta with internal transport barrier and negative central magnetic shear in DIII-D , 2006, Physics of Plasmas.

[17]  L. L. Lao,et al.  The ARIES-AT advanced tokamak, Advanced technology fusion power plant , 2006 .

[18]  Jian Shan Gao Monitoring of Inland Tide Embankment of Binzhou Port , 2014 .

[19]  J. Minervini,et al.  US fusion program requirements for superconducting magnet research , 2003 .

[20]  J. Voccio,et al.  No-insulation multi-width winding technique for high temperature superconducting magnet. , 2013, Applied physics letters.

[21]  FIRE, a next step option for magnetic fusion , 2002 .

[22]  Joseph V. Minervini,et al.  HTS twisted stacked-tape cable conductor , 2011 .

[23]  Joseph V. Minervini,et al.  ITER CS model coil and CS insert test results , 2001 .

[24]  P. Bonoli,et al.  ARC: A compact, high-field, fusion nuclear science facility and demonstration power plant with demountable magnets , 2014, 1409.3540.

[25]  Farrokh Najmabadi,et al.  Fusion power plants-goals and technological challenges , 1996, IECEC 96. Proceedings of the 31st Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference.

[26]  C. Bathke,et al.  Physics basis for a tokamak fusion power plant , 2000 .