Increasing chemotherapeutic and targeted drug options has led to improved overall survival in metastatic colorectal cancer. Panitumumab is a fully humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to the EGF receptor and inhibits downstream cell signaling with net effects

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in men and second most common cancer in women worldwide [1]. Approximately 20% of patients will present with metastatic disease while many others with stage II or III disease will relapse with distant metastatic disease after primary treatment. The availability of active chemotherapy agents, fluoropyrimidine (oral and IV), oxaliplatin and irinotecan, has resulted in improvement in median overall survival (OS) in metastatic (mCRC) from 12 months to 18–21 months [2]. Despite this, 5-year survival for patients with mCRC remains less than 10% [3,4]. Increased adoption of metastatectomy for liver-limited disease has significantly improved long-term survival in this subset of patients with reported 5-year OS of 37–58% [5,6]. The other major advance is the recent availability of targeted therapies, targeting VEGF and EGF receptor (EGFR). Bevacizumab (Avastin, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland), a monoclonal antibody (MoAb) targeting VEGF, prolongs progression-free survival (PFS) and OS when used in the firstand second-line of treatment in combination with chemotherapy [4]. Aflibercept (Zaltrap, Sanofi US, Inc.), also targeting VEGF, was approved by the US FDA in August 2012 for second-line treatment of mCRC in combination with infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid/irinotecan (FOLFIRI) chemotherapy after demonstrating improved PFS and OS in this setting [7]. Regorafenib, an oral inhibitor of angiogenic signaling (including VEGF) has demonstrated improved OS and PFS as monotherapy in treatment refractory mCRC [8]. US FDA approval of regorafenib in September 2012 provides a further treatment option for patients who have exhausted all other available therapies. There are two EGFR inhibitors available on the market; cetuximab (Erbitux, Merck KgaA, Darmstadt, Germany) and panitumumab (Vectibix, Amgen Inc., CA, USA). Both drugs have demonstrated efficacy in patients with wild-type (WT; i.e., non-mutated) KRAS tumors (KRAS WT) as monotherapy in chemotherapy-refractory mCRC and in earlier lines of treatment in combination with chemotherapy. Availability and approved indications of EGFR inhibitors varies around the world based on the differing assessments of trial data by funding bodies. With the availability of new drugs, particularly targeted agents, the overall treatment algorithm for mCRC has become increasingly complex. There is a paucity of randomized trial data to assist the clinician on the best sequencing and combination of these agents. Until further trials are reported, clinicians need an understanding of the data relating to each agent to assist treatment decisions with the goal of maximizing survival and maintaining quality of life (QoL) for patients with mCRC. Christopher M Hocking1, Amanda R Townsend1 and Timothy J Price*1,2

[1]  P. Gibbs,et al.  Association of hypomagnesemia with inferior survival in a phase III, randomized study of cetuximab plus best supportive care versus best supportive care alone: NCIC CTG/AGITG CO.17. , 2013, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[2]  T. Greten,et al.  Prognostic value of cetuximab‐related skin toxicity in metastatic colorectal cancer patients and its correlation with parameters of the epidermal growth factor receptor signal transduction pathway: Results from a randomized trial of the GERMAN AIO CRC Study Group , 2013, International journal of cancer.

[3]  D. Sargent,et al.  Regorafenib monotherapy for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (CORRECT): an international, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial , 2013, The Lancet.

[4]  S. Barni,et al.  The predictive role of skin rash with cetuximab and panitumumab in colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published trials , 2013, Targeted Oncology.

[5]  E. Van Cutsem,et al.  Mutant KRAS codon 12 and 13 alleles in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: assessment as prognostic and predictive biomarkers of response to panitumumab. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  C. Bokemeyer,et al.  Association of KRAS G13D tumor mutations with outcome in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with first-line chemotherapy with or without cetuximab. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  T. Hickish,et al.  Feasibility of preoperative chemotherapy for locally advanced, operable colon cancer: the pilot phase of a randomised controlled trial , 2012, The Lancet. Oncology.

[8]  E. Van Cutsem,et al.  Addition of aflibercept to fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan improves survival in a phase III randomized trial in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer previously treated with an oxaliplatin-based regimen. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  M. Peeters,et al.  Biologic therapies in the metastatic colorectal cancer treatment continuum--applying current evidence to clinical practice. , 2012, Cancer treatment reviews.

[10]  H. Sorbye,et al.  Phase III trial of cetuximab with continuous or intermittent fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (Nordic FLOX) versus FLOX alone in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: the NORDIC-VII study. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  S. Barni,et al.  Risk of anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody-related hypomagnesemia: systematic review and pooled analysis of randomized studies , 2012, Expert opinion on drug safety.

[12]  C. Köhne,et al.  Panitumumab in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma. , 2012, Clinical colorectal cancer.

[13]  F. Bosch,et al.  Identification of a mutation in the extracellular domain of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor conferring cetuximab resistance in colorectal cancer , 2012, Nature Medicine.

[14]  M. Lacouture,et al.  The efficacy and safety of panitumumab administered concomitantly with FOLFIRI or Irinotecan in second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: the secondary analysis from STEPP (Skin Toxicity Evaluation Protocol With Panitumumab) by KRAS status. , 2011, Clinical colorectal cancer.

[15]  P. Novotny,et al.  Prophylactic tetracycline does not diminish the severity of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor-induced rash: results from the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (Supplementary N03CB) , 2011, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[16]  R. Perez-soler,et al.  The Phosphatase Inhibitor Menadione (Vitamin K3) Protects Cells from EGFR Inhibition by Erlotinib and Cetuximab , 2011, Clinical Cancer Research.

[17]  David A. Smith,et al.  An open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial of panitumumab plus FOLFIRI as second-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2011, Clinical colorectal cancer.

[18]  T. Price,et al.  Impact of KRAS and BRAF Gene Mutation Status on Outcomes From the Phase III AGITG MAX Trial of Capecitabine Alone or in Combination With Bevacizumab and Mitomycin in Advanced Colorectal Cancer. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  C. Bokemeyer,et al.  Efficacy according to biomarker status of cetuximab plus FOLFOX-4 as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: the OPUS study. , 2011, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[20]  D. Lambrechts,et al.  Addition of cetuximab to oxaliplatin-based first-line combination chemotherapy for treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: results of the randomised phase 3 MRC COIN trial , 2011, The Lancet.

[21]  E. Van Cutsem,et al.  Cetuximab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: updated analysis of overall survival according to tumor KRAS and BRAF mutation status. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  Francesco Trotta,et al.  Evaluation of oncology drugs at the European Medicines Agency and US Food and Drug Administration: when differences have an impact on clinical practice. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  R. Jorissen,et al.  Optimizing targeted therapeutic development: Analysis of a colorectal cancer patient population with the BRAFV600E mutation , 2011, International journal of cancer.

[24]  B. Vincenzi,et al.  Early magnesium modifications as a surrogate marker of efficacy of cetuximab-based anticancer treatment in KRAS wild-type advanced colorectal cancer patients. , 2011, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[25]  J. Cassiman Molecular Diagnostics , 2011, Human Genomics.

[26]  S. Barni,et al.  Cetuximab and panitumumab in KRAS wild-type colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis , 2011, International Journal of Colorectal Disease.

[27]  Josep Tabernero,et al.  Randomized, phase III trial of panitumumab with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) versus FOLFOX4 alone as first-line treatment in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: the PRIME study. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[28]  E. Van Cutsem,et al.  Randomized phase III study of panitumumab with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) compared with FOLFIRI alone as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[29]  L. Roskos,et al.  Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Perspectives on the Clinical Drug Development of Panitumumab , 2010, Clinical pharmacokinetics.

[30]  A. Bardelli,et al.  Association of KRAS p.G13D mutation with outcome in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab. , 2010, JAMA.

[31]  D. Cunningham,et al.  Epirubicin, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine with or without panitumumab for advanced esophagogastric cancer: dose-finding study for the prospective multicenter, randomized, phase II/III REAL-3 trial. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[32]  Sabine Tejpar,et al.  Effects of KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, and PIK3CA mutations on the efficacy of cetuximab plus chemotherapy in chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective consortium analysis. , 2010, The Lancet. Oncology.

[33]  I. Nagtegaal,et al.  Markers for EGFR pathway activation as predictor of outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with or without cetuximab. , 2010, European journal of cancer.

[34]  J. Marshall,et al.  Molecularly Targeted Therapy for Metastatic Colon Cancer: Proven Treatments and Promising New Agents , 2010, Gastrointestinal cancer research : GCR.

[35]  G. Keating Panitumumab , 2010, Drugs.

[36]  J. Douillard,et al.  PANERB study: Panitumumab after cetuximab-based regimen failure. , 2010 .

[37]  M. Vincent,et al.  Adverse events associated with anti-EGFR therapies for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer , 2010, Current oncology.

[38]  J. Berlin,et al.  Lack of Correlation between Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Status and Response to Panitumumab Monotherapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[39]  M. Lacouture,et al.  Skin toxicity evaluation protocol with panitumumab (STEPP), a phase II, open-label, randomized trial evaluating the impact of a pre-Emptive Skin treatment regimen on skin toxicities and quality of life in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[40]  A. Bardelli,et al.  Molecular mechanisms of resistance to cetuximab and panitumumab in colorectal cancer. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[41]  P. Parren,et al.  Human IgG2 Antibodies against Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Effectively Trigger Antibody-Dependent Cellular Cytotoxicity but, in Contrast to IgG1, Only by Cells of Myeloid Lineage , 2009, The Journal of Immunology.

[42]  E. Van Cutsem,et al.  Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[43]  Linda Mol,et al.  Chemotherapy, bevacizumab, and cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[44]  A. Antonacopoulou,et al.  Autophagy: novel action of panitumumab in colon cancer. , 2009, Anticancer research.

[45]  E. Van Cutsem,et al.  Surgery with curative-intent in patients treated with first-line chemotherapy plus bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer First BEAT and the randomised phase-III NO16966 trial , 2009, British Journal of Cancer.

[46]  A. Ohtsu,et al.  Safety and pharmacokinetics of panitumumab in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors , 2009, International Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[47]  D. Sargent,et al.  Improved survival in metastatic colorectal cancer is associated with adoption of hepatic resection and improved chemotherapy. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[48]  K. Muro,et al.  A phase 2 clinical trial of panitumumab monotherapy in Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2009, Japanese journal of clinical oncology.

[49]  E. Van Cutsem,et al.  Association of progression‐free survival, overall survival, and patient‐reported outcomes by skin toxicity and KRAS status in patients receiving panitumumab monotherapy , 2009, Cancer.

[50]  Seta Shahin,et al.  A randomized phase IIIB trial of chemotherapy, bevacizumab, and panitumumab compared with chemotherapy and bevacizumab alone for metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[51]  L. Mazzucchelli,et al.  Wild-type BRAF is required for response to panitumumab or cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[52]  I. Floriani,et al.  High concordance of KRAS status between primary colorectal tumors and related metastatic sites: implications for clinical practice. , 2008, The oncologist.

[53]  Dongsheng Tu,et al.  K-ras mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[54]  P. Novotny,et al.  Tetracycline to prevent epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor‐induced skin rashes , 2008, Cancer.

[55]  G. Jean,et al.  Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Monoclonal Antibodies for the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer , 2008, Pharmacotherapy.

[56]  V. Adamo,et al.  Early Magnesium Reduction in Advanced Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with Cetuximab Plus Irinotecan as Predictive Factor of Efficacy and Outcome , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[57]  Daniel J. Freeman,et al.  Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[58]  R. Figlin,et al.  Dose and Schedule Study of Panitumumab Monotherapy in Patients with Advanced Solid Malignancies , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[59]  A. Halpern,et al.  Randomized double-blind trial of prophylactic oral minocycline and topical tazarotene for cetuximab-associated acne-like eruption. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[60]  Yuman Fong,et al.  Actual 10-year survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases defines cure. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[61]  M. Gonen,et al.  Randomized phase II trial of cetuximab, bevacizumab, and irinotecan compared with cetuximab and bevacizumab alone in irinotecan-refractory colorectal cancer: the BOND-2 study. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[62]  J. Berlin,et al.  Panitumumab monotherapy in patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer , 2007, Cancer.

[63]  Marc Peeters,et al.  Open-label phase III trial of panitumumab plus best supportive care compared with best supportive care alone in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[64]  J. Berlin,et al.  Panitumumab with irinotecan/leucovorin/5-fluorouracil for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2007, Clinical colorectal cancer.

[65]  M. Lacouture Mechanisms of cutaneous toxicities to EGFR inhibitors , 2006, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[66]  E. Abdalla,et al.  Improving Resectability of Hepatic Colorectal Metastases: Expert Consensus Statement , 2006, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[67]  G. Wilding,et al.  Cetuximab-induced hypomagnesemia in patients with colorectal cancer. , 2006, Clinical colorectal cancer.

[68]  H. Lenz Anti-EGFR mechanism of action: antitumor effect and underlying cause of adverse events. , 2006, Oncology.

[69]  Richard L Schilsky,et al.  Cetuximab in the treatment of colorectal cancer. , 2004, Clinical advances in hematology & oncology : H&O.

[70]  E. Van Cutsem,et al.  Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[71]  Neal J Meropol,et al.  Phase II trial of cetuximab in patients with refractory colorectal cancer that expresses the epidermal growth factor receptor. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[72]  D. Sargent,et al.  Survival of patients with advanced colorectal cancer improves with the availability of fluorouracil-leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin in the course of treatment. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[73]  G. Girolomoni,et al.  Blockade of the EGF receptor induces a deranged chemokine expression in keratinocytes leading to enhanced skin inflammation. , 2003, The American journal of pathology.

[74]  C. Davis,et al.  Eradication of established tumors by a fully human monoclonal antibody to the epidermal growth factor receptor without concomitant chemotherapy. , 1999, Cancer research.

[75]  V. Heinemann,et al.  Prognostic value of cetuximab‐related skin toxicity in metastatic colorectal cancer patients and its correlation with parameters of the epidermal growth factor receptor signal transduction pathway: Results from a randomized trial of the GERMAN AIO CRC Study Group , 2013, International journal of cancer.

[76]  Jeffrey W. Clark,et al.  Panitumumab in patients with KRAS wild-type colorectal cancer after progression on cetuximab. , 2012, The oncologist.

[77]  R. Greil,et al.  First-line panitumumab plus irinotecan/5-fluorouracil/leucovorin treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer , 2011, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.

[78]  J. Crawford,et al.  An open-label clinical trial evaluating safety and pharmacokinetics of two dosing schedules of panitumumab in patients with solid tumors. , 2009, Clinical colorectal cancer.

[79]  W. Scheithauer,et al.  An open-label, single-arm study assessing safety and efficacy of panitumumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapy. , 2008, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[80]  G. Corona,et al.  Pharmacology of epidermal growth factor inhibitors. , 2007, The International journal of biological markers.