The Role of Teacher Questioning in Promoting Dialogic Literary Inquiry in Computer-Mediated Communication

Abstract This article reports research from an innovative university-secondary school partnership, the Web Pen Pals Project, which pairs preservice English teachers in online chat rooms with local middle school students to talk about young adult literature. The analyses reported here center on the type of dialogue that results during such online conversations. Findings suggest preservice teachers bring traditional classroom discourse expectations to CMC, and strategies that help CMC facilitators synthesize and focus discourse into co-created “group texts” are needed. Based on these findings, implications for educators who use CMC in teacher preparation to facilitate collaborative learning are suggested.

[1]  S. Condon,et al.  Functional comparisons of face-to-face and computer-mediated decision making interactions , 1996 .

[2]  Jerome Bump,et al.  Radical changes in class discussion using networked computers , 1990, Comput. Humanit..

[3]  Holly H. Robbins,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Preservice Teachers' Reflective Thinking in Synchronous Versus Asynchronous , 2006 .

[4]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course , 2000 .

[5]  Kathleen Carico,et al.  A Generation in Cyberspace Engaging Readers through Online Discussions: Real Time, Online Chats Provide an Alternative Space for Engaging Reading in Making Meaning through Literature. , 2004 .

[6]  Jay L. Lemke.  Using language in the classroom , 1989 .

[7]  S. Aisha Walker,et al.  Socratic strategies and devil's advocacy in synchronous CMC debate , 2004, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[8]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  Qualitative research and case study applications in education , 1998 .

[9]  Martin Nystrand,et al.  Opening Dialogue: Understanding the Dynamics of Language and Learning in the English Classroom (Language and Literacy Series) , 1996 .

[10]  M. Bakhtin,et al.  The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays , 1981 .

[11]  M. O’Loughlin.  Daring the imagination: Unlocking voices of dissent and possibility in teaching , 1995 .

[12]  Karen Hartman,et al.  Why write-together-concurently on a computer network , 1993 .

[13]  Selma Vonderwell.  Assessing online learning and teaching: Adapting the minute Paper , 2004 .

[14]  O. Lee,et al.  Pedagogical Implications of Online Discussion for Preservice Teacher Training , 2003 .

[15]  D. Wells,et al.  Grand Conversations: An Exploration of Meaning Construction in Literature Study Groups , 1989, Research in the Teaching of English.

[16]  T. Paulus.  Collaboration or Cooperation? Analyzing Small Group Interactions in Educational Environments , 2005 .

[17]  S. Herring.  Computer-Mediated Discourse Analysis : An Approach to Researching Online Behavior , 2004 .

[18]  Larry R. Johannessen,et al.  Talking in Class: Using Discussion to Enhance Teaching And Learning , 2006 .

[19]  T. Paulus,et al.  The name assigned to the document by the author. This field may also contain sub-titles, series names, and report numbers.Learning through Dialogue: Online Case Studies in Educational Psychology , 2006 .

[20]  P. Healy,et al.  Learning the lessons. , 1996, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[21]  Cathy Burnett,et al.  Learning to Chat: Tutor participation in synchronous online chat , 2003 .

[22]  C.-H. Wang,et al.  Questioning skills facilitate online synchronous discussions , 2005, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[23]  J. Bruner.  Actual minds, possible worlds , 1985 .

[24]  Curtis Jay Bonk,et al.  Time to "connect": synchronous and asynchronous case-based dialogue among preservice teachers , 1998 .

[25]  Maureen P. Boyd,et al.  Elaborated Student Talk in an Elementary ESoL Classroom. , 2002 .

[26]  Dawn M. Poole.  Student Participation in a Discussion-Oriented Online Course , 2000 .

[27]  dean fontenot,et al.  The Use of Online Synchronous Discussion Groups to Enhance Community Formation and Professional Identity Development , 2002 .

[28]  Lesley A. Rex,et al.  "If Anything Is Odd, Inappropriate, Confusing, or Boring, It's Probably Important": The Emergence of Inclusive Academic Literacy through English Classroom Discussion Practices , 1999 .

[29]  D. Bridges.  Education, Democracy and Discussion , 1988 .

[30]  C. Goodwin,et al.  Rethinking Context: An Introduction , 1992 .

[31]  J. A. Hatch,et al.  Doing Qualitative Research in Education Settings , 2002 .

[32]  Zane L. Berge,et al.  Characteristics of online teaching in post-secondary, formal education , 1997 .

[33]  R. Luppicini.  Review of computer mediated communication research for education , 2007 .

[34]  R. Stake.  The art of case study research , 1995 .

[35]  Nicholas C. Burbules,et al.  Dialogue in Teaching: Theory and Practice , 2000 .

[36]  Sarah Michaels,et al.  Discourse, learning, and schooling: Shifting participant frameworks: orchestrating thinking practices in group discussion , 1996 .

[37]  M. Nystrand,et al.  Instructional Discourse, Student Engagement, and Literature Achievement , 1991, Research in the Teaching of English.

[38]  Gordon Wells,et al.  Reevaluating the IRF sequence: A proposal for the articulation of theories of activity and discourse for the analysis of teaching and learning in the classroom , 1993 .

[39]  David Crystal,et al.  Language and the Internet , 2001 .

[40]  Courtney B. Cazden,et al.  Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning. Second Edition. , 2001 .

[41]  T. Jetton.  Using Computer-Mediated Discussion To Facilitate Preservice Teachers’ Understanding of Literacy Assessment And Instruction , 2003 .

[42]  Lin Muilenburg,et al.  How Do Students Participate in Synchronous and Asynchronous Online Discussions? , 2001 .

[43]  James Boyle,et al.  Factors influencing the success of computer mediated communication (CMC) environments in university teaching: a review and case study , 2000, Comput. Educ..

[44]  Peter Smagorinsky,et al.  The social environment of the classroom: A Vygotskian perspective on small group process , 1993 .

[45]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Software Design and the Future of the Virtual Classroom , 1995 .

[46]  M. J. W. Thomas,et al.  Learning within incoherent structures: the space of online discussion forums , 2002, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..