BioPat: an investigation tool for analysis of industry evolution, technological paths and policy impact in the biofuels sector

This chapter describes the methodology, characteristics and potential use of BioPat, a dataset containing patents in the field of biofuels. The innovative methodology we use aims to solve drawbacks related to how patent data are allocated and organised in international databases. In order to create a database which includes patents strictly related to the investigated field, we propose an original method based on keywords, rather than on International Patent Classification (IPC) codes. Starting with a systematic mapping of biofuel production processes, we built a simplified but comprehensive description of the technological domain related to the production of biofuels by applying so-called process analysis. The keyword selection relies on an iterative approach, based on an analysis of recent scientific literature. The database was finalised with a series of interviews with experts in the biofuels sector and compared with IPC-based biofuel codes, revealing improved accuracy when selecting data using our methodology.

[1]  Aie World Energy Outlook 2007 , 2007 .

[2]  Martin L. Weitzman,et al.  Hybridizing Growth Theory , 1996 .

[3]  Marie-Angèle De Looze,et al.  Corpus relevance through co-word analysis: An application to plant proteints , 1997, Scientometrics.

[4]  Mark A. Lemley Examiner Characteristics and the Patent Grant Rate , 2009 .

[5]  V. Costantini,et al.  Public policies for a sustainable energy sector: regulation, diversity and fostering of innovation , 2013 .

[6]  C. Pray,et al.  Private sector innovation in biofuels in the United States: induced by prices or policies? , 2009 .

[7]  Stefan Kuhlmann,et al.  Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change , 2007 .

[8]  Franco Malerba,et al.  Schumpeterian patterns of innovative activity in the ICT field , 2007 .

[9]  Neal S. Coulter,et al.  Software Engineering as Seen through Its Research Literature: A Study in Co-Word Analysis , 1998, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[10]  Nicola De Liso,et al.  Economics of structural and technological change , 1997 .

[11]  Neal S. Coulter,et al.  Software Engineering as Seen through Its Research Literature: A Study in Co-Word Analysis , 1998, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[12]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  Patents, Citations and Innovations , 2002 .

[13]  D. Archibugi,et al.  Measuring technological change through patents and innovation surveys , 1996 .

[14]  Daniele Archibugi,et al.  Measuring technological through patents and innovation surveys , 1996 .

[15]  Z. Griliches Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[16]  Lucio Picci,et al.  The Internationalization of Inventive Activity: A Gravity Model Using Patent Data , 2010 .

[17]  Kimberly S. Hamilton,et al.  The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science , 1997 .

[18]  Unctad-Ictsd Resource Book on TRIPS and Development: Patents: Biotechnological Inventions: Genetic Resources, Plant Variety Protection, Traditional Knowledge , 2005 .

[19]  M. Thring World Energy Outlook , 1977 .

[20]  D. Popp,et al.  Renewable Energy Policies and Technological Innovation: Evidence Based on Patent Counts , 2008 .