Species‐Level Impacts on Chaparral Root Zone Hydrology

A set of four unconfined (earthen‐walled) lysimeters in the San Dimas Experimental Forest near Los Angeles, CA, provides a unique opportunity to examine the effect of species‐level vegetation on root zone hydrology under highly controlled experimental conditions. The 28.1‐m2 by 2.1‐m deep lysimeters were specifically designed to minimize variation of all environmental conditions except vegetation. Monocultures of buckwheat (Eriogonum fasciculatum Benth. var. foliolosum Nutt.), chamise (Adenstomata fasciculatum Hooke & Arn.), scrub oak (Quercus dumosa Nutt.), and Coulter pine (Pinus coulteri D. Don.) were planted in 1946. In 1997 two sets of soil cores were sampled from each lysimeter to evaluate species level effects resulting from 50 yr of growth. The cores were analyzed for water content, soil water potential, and pore water chloride. The chloride mass balance approach was used to estimate long‐term average fluxes and residence times of water in the lysimeters. One core from each lysimeter was also analyzed for pore water stable isotope (δ2H) composition. Only small differences were observed between the four species in terms of the shapes of the depth profiles and the absolute values of the hydrologic characteristics and fluxes. However, some differences were statistically significant. For example, differences in some characteristics were found between the chamise and the other species. We also observed differences between the lowest aboveground biomass group (buckwheat and chamise) versus the highest aboveground biomass group (oak and pine). These results suggest that although species‐ and biomass‐level differences in root zone hydrologic behavior appear to be minor, there are detectible differences in how these vegetation types affect the water budget in chaparral ecosystems.

[1]  F. Phillips,et al.  Ecohydrological controls on soil moisture fluxes in arid to semiarid vadose zones , 2006 .

[2]  E. Vivoni,et al.  Ecohydrology of water‐limited environments: A scientific vision , 2006 .

[3]  T. Meixner,et al.  Altered ecohydrologic response drives native shrub loss under conditions of elevated nitrogen deposition. , 2006, Journal of environmental quality.

[4]  P. Hendrix,et al.  Leaf litter decomposition in a chaparral ecosystem, Southern California , 2005 .

[5]  E. Kwicklis,et al.  Development of an Infiltration Map for the Los Alamos Area, New Mexico , 2005 .

[6]  P. Shouse,et al.  Regolith Water in Zero‐Order Chaparral and Perennial Grass Watersheds Four Decades after Vegetation Conversion , 2004 .

[7]  F. Phillips,et al.  Identifying areas of basin-floor recharge in the Trans-Pecos region and the link to vegetation , 2004 .

[8]  P. Castiglione,et al.  Microclimate and Pedogenic Implications in a 50‐Year‐Old Chaparral and Pine Biosequence , 2004 .

[9]  Laosheng Wu,et al.  Modification of soil structural and hydraulic properties after 50 years of imposed chaparral and pine vegetation , 2002 .

[10]  O. Chadwick,et al.  Vegetation control on soil organic matter dynamics , 2001 .

[11]  M. Anderson,et al.  Soil organic matter processes: characterization by 13C NMR and 14C measurements , 2000 .

[12]  Bridget R. Scanlon,et al.  Uncertainties in estimating water fluxes and residence times using environmental tracers in an arid unsaturated zone , 2000 .

[13]  Robert C. Graham,et al.  Distribution, accumulation, and fluxes of soil carbon in four monoculture lysimeters at San Dimas Experimental Forest, California , 1999 .

[14]  O. Chadwick,et al.  Organic carbon sequestration under chaparral and pine after four decades of soil development , 1998 .

[15]  B. Wilcox,et al.  Tracer-based studies of soil water movement in semi-arid forests of New Mexico , 1997 .

[16]  O. Chadwick,et al.  Base cation biogeochemistry and weathering under oak and pine: a controlled long-term experiment , 1996 .

[17]  R. Graham,et al.  Transformations of 2:1 phyllosilicates in 41-year-old soils under oak and pine , 1996 .

[18]  R. Graham,et al.  Aggregate Stability under Oak and Pine after Four Decades of Soil Development , 1995 .

[19]  Robert G. Knowlton,et al.  Application of a numerical model for simulating water flow, isotope transport, and heat transfer in the unsaturated zone , 1995 .

[20]  F. Phillips,et al.  Water movement in desert soil traced by hydrogen and oxygen isotopes, chloride, and chlorine-36, southern Arizona , 1995 .

[21]  O. Chadwick,et al.  Decade-scale changes of soil carbon, nitrogen and exchangeable cations under chaparral and pine , 1995 .

[22]  Fred M. Phillips,et al.  Environmental Tracers for Water Movement in Desert Soils of the American Southwest , 1994 .

[23]  Glendon W. Gee,et al.  Rapid Measurement of Low Soil Water Potentials Using a Water Activity Meter , 1992 .

[24]  R. Graham,et al.  Morphologic Development and Clay Redistribution in Lysimeter Soils under Chaparral and Pine , 1991 .

[25]  James R. Ehleringer,et al.  Streamside trees that do not use stream water , 1991, Nature.

[26]  M. Poth,et al.  The San Dimas experimental forest: 50 years of research , 1988 .

[27]  C. Kendall,et al.  Multisample conversion of water to hydrogen by zinc for stable isotope determination , 1985 .

[28]  G. B. Allison,et al.  Recharge in karst and dune elements of a semi-arid landscape as indicated by natural isotopes and chloride , 1985 .

[29]  G. B. Allison,et al.  The distribution of deuterium and 18O in dry soils: 3. Theory for non-isothermal water movement , 1984 .

[30]  G. B. Allison,et al.  The distribution of deuterium and 18O in dry soils 2. Experimental , 1983 .

[31]  G. B. Allison,et al.  The distribution of deuterium and 18O in dry soils: 1. Theory , 1983 .

[32]  D. Ehhalt,et al.  Soil-water movement and evapotranspiration: Changes in the isotopic composition of the water , 1967 .

[33]  G. Phillips,et al.  Radiation chemistry of carbohydrates. , 1961, Advances in carbohydrate chemistry.

[34]  H. Hellmers,et al.  Root Systems of Some Chaparral Plants in Southern California , 1955 .