High-Tech Versus Low-Tech Instructional Strategies

Although the use of clickers (classroom response systems) has been widely investigated, fewer studies directly compared outcomes for clickers with other active response methods, such as handheld response cards. We measured students' test performance and their self-reported anxiety and hope for upcoming tests after attending review sessions for an introductory psychology course. Students alternated using clickers and cards across the semester. Using clickers did not generally enhance test performance, reduce anxiety, or increase hope. However, some students appeared to benefit from using clickers at different points during the semester. Students unanimously preferred clickers to response cards, particularly for the anonymity that clickers afforded.

[1]  N. Lasry,et al.  Clickers or Flashcards : Is There Really a Difference ? , 2008 .

[2]  S. Davis Observations in classrooms using a network of handheld devices , 2003, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[3]  J. Mestre,et al.  ASK-IT/A2L: Assessing student knowlede with instructional technology , 2005, physics/0508144.

[4]  Markus A. Maier,et al.  Achievement goals and discrete achievement emotions : A theoretical model and prospective test , 2006 .

[5]  Douglas Duncan,et al.  Clickers in the Classroom: How to Enhance Science Teaching Using Classroom Response Systems , 2004 .

[6]  Jill A. Marshall,et al.  Classroom Response Systems: A Review of the Literature , 2006 .

[7]  Wendy Beekes The ‘Millionaire’ method for encouraging participation , 2006 .

[8]  Meghan D. McAuliffe,et al.  Efficacy of Personal Response Systems (“Clickers”) in Large, Introductory Psychology Classes , 2008 .

[9]  Margie Martyn,et al.  Clickers in the Classroom: An Active Learning Approach. , 2007 .

[10]  D. Nicol,et al.  Peer Instruction versus Class-wide Discussion in Large Classes: A comparison of two interaction methods in the wired classroom , 2003 .

[11]  Dennis M. Shaffer,et al.  Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Personal Response System in the Classroom , 2009 .

[12]  Quintin I. Cutts,et al.  The association between students' use of an electronic voting system and their learning outcomes , 2005, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[13]  J. Stowell,et al.  Benefits of Electronic Audience Response Systems on Student Participation, Learning, and Emotion , 2007 .

[14]  T. Goetz,et al.  Academic Emotions in Students' Self-Regulated Learning and Achievement: A Program of Qualitative and Quantitative Research , 2002 .