Evolution of cooperation on complex networks with synergistic and discounted group interactions

In the real world individuals often engage in group interactions and their payoffs are determined by many factors, including the typical nonlinear interactions, i.e., synergy and discounting. Previous literatures assume that individual payoffs are either synergistically enhanced or discounted with the additional cooperators. Such settings ignore the interplay of these two factors, which is in sharp contrast with the fact that they ubiquitously coexist. Here we investigate how the coexistence and periodical switching of synergistic and discounted group interactions affect the evolution of cooperation on various complex networks. We show that scale-free networks facilitate the emergence of cooperation in terms of fixation probability for group interactions. With nonlinear interactions the heterogeneity of the degree acts as a double-edged sword: below the neutral drift it is the best for cooperation while above the neutral drift it instead provides the least opportunity for cooperators to be fixed. The advantages of the heterogeneity fade as interactive attributes switch between synergy and discounting, which suggests that the heterogeneity of population structures cannot favor cooperators in group interactions even with simple nonlinear interactions. Nonetheless, scale-free networks always guarantee cooperators the fastest rate of fixation. Our work implies that even very simple nonlinear group interactions could greatly shape the fixation probability and fixation time of cooperators in structured populations indicated by complex networks.

[1]  M. Nowak Evolutionary Dynamics: Exploring the Equations of Life , 2006 .

[2]  C. Hauert,et al.  Reward and punishment , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  J. Cuesta,et al.  Heterogeneous networks do not promote cooperation when humans play a Prisoner’s Dilemma , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Zhihai Rong,et al.  Effect of the degree correlation in public goods game on scale-free networks , 2009 .

[5]  F. C. Santos,et al.  Scale-free networks provide a unifying framework for the emergence of cooperation. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[6]  M. Perc,et al.  Social diversity and promotion of cooperation in the spatial prisoner's dilemma game. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[7]  Long Wang,et al.  One step memory of group reputation is optimal to promote cooperation in public goods games , 2013 .

[8]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics of group interactions on structured populations: a review , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[9]  G. Wergen,et al.  Records in stochastic processes—theory and applications , 2012, 1211.6005.

[10]  Long Wang,et al.  Individual's expulsion to nasty environment promotes cooperation in public goods games , 2009 .

[11]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Topology-independent impact of noise on cooperation in spatial public goods games. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[12]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Restricted connections among distinguished players support cooperation. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[13]  Jeremy S. Webb,et al.  Enhanced Biofilm Formation and Increased Resistance to Antimicrobial Agents and Bacterial Invasion Are Caused by Synergistic Interactions in Multispecies Biofilms , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[14]  C. Hauert,et al.  Reputation-based partner choice promotes cooperation in social networks. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[15]  F. C. Santos,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics of social dilemmas in structured heterogeneous populations. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.