Compressive stress effects on nanoparticle modulus and fracture

Individual nanoparticles of silicon and titanium having diameters in the range of $40--140\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{nm}$ have been repeatedly compressed by a nanoindenter. Even at low loads, the small tip-particle and particle-substrate contacts generate extreme pressures within the confined particle, influencing its stiffness and fracture toughness. The effect of these high pressures on the measured modulus is taken into account by invoking a Murnaghan equation-of-state-based analysis. Fracture toughness of the silicon particles is found to increase by a factor of 4 in compression for a $40\text{\ensuremath{-}}\mathrm{nm}$-diam particle when compared to bulk silicon. Additionally, strain energy release rates increase by more than an order of magnitude for particles of this size when compared to bulk Si.

[1]  A. M. Wahl.  Finite deformations of an elastic solid: by Francis D. Murnaghan. 140 pages, 15 × 23 cm. New York, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1951. Price, $4.00 , 1952 .

[2]  E. Stach,et al.  Room temperature dislocation plasticity in silicon , 2005 .

[3]  J.C.M. Li,et al.  Edge dislocations emitted along multiple inclined slip planes from a Mode I crack. II. Simultaneous emission , 1996 .

[4]  Christensen,et al.  Pressure strengthening: A way to multimegabar static pressures. , 1995, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[5]  Hertz.  On the Contact of Elastic Solids , 1882 .

[6]  Zhong Lin Wang,et al.  Nanoscale mechanical behavior of individual semiconducting nanobelts , 2003 .

[7]  Frederick H. Streitz,et al.  Quantum-based atomistic simulation of materials properties in transition metals , 2002 .

[8]  K. Johnson.  Contact Mechanics: Frontmatter , 1985 .

[9]  A. Argon,et al.  Towards the understanding of mechanical properties of super- and ultrahard nanocomposites , 2002 .

[10]  B. M. Fulk.  MATH , 1992 .

[11]  F. D. Stacey,et al.  High pressure equations of state with applications to the lower mantle and core , 2004 .

[12]  T. Wyrobek,et al.  Challenges and interesting observations associated with feedback-controlled nanoindentation , 2004, International Journal of Materials Research.

[13]  G. Pharr,et al.  An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments , 1992 .

[14]  Mauro Causà,et al.  The high-pressure phase transitions of silicon and gallium nitride: a comparative study of Hartree - Fock and density functional calculations , 1996 .

[15]  Ting Zhu,et al.  Quantifying the early stages of plasticity through nanoscale experiments and simulations , 2003 .

[16]  C. B. Carter,et al.  A boundary constraint energy balance criterion for small volume deformation , 2005 .

[17]  M. M. Chaudhri,et al.  High-speed photography of low-velocity impact cracking of solid spheres , 2000 .

[18]  W. W. Gerberich,et al.  Fracturing a nanoparticle , 2007 .

[19]  H. Mao,et al.  Quasi‐hydrostatic compression of magnesium oxide to 52 GPa: Implications for the pressure‐volume‐temperature equation of state , 2001 .

[20]  R. Nieminen,et al.  Nanoindentation of silicon surfaces: Molecular-dynamics simulations of atomic force microscopy , 2000 .

[21]  Carnegie Institution of Washington,et al.  Pressure-induced α → ω transition in titanium metal: a systematic study of the effects of uniaxial stress , 2004, cond-mat/0401549.

[22]  J. D. Kiely,et al.  Defect-dependent elasticity: Nanoindentation as a probe of stress state , 2000 .

[23]  C. B. Carter,et al.  Superhard silicon nanospheres , 2003 .