Authenticity or autonomy? When deep brain stimulation causes a dilemma

While deep brain stimulation (DBS) for patients with Parkinson's disease has typically raised ethical questions about autonomy, accountability and personal identity, recent research indicates that we need to begin taking into account issues surrounding the patients’ feelings of authenticity and alienation as well. In order to bring out the relevance of this dimension to ethical considerations of DBS, I analyse a recent case study of a Dutch patient who, as a result of DBS, faced a dilemma between autonomy and authenticity. This case study is meant to point out the normatively meaningful tension patients under DBS experience between authenticity and autonomy.

[1]  B. Bejjani,et al.  Neurosurgery in Parkinson disease: A distressed mind in a repaired body? , 2007, Neurology.

[2]  Ross E. G. Upshur,et al.  Better than Well: American Medicine Meets the American Dream , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  Françoise Baylis,et al.  “I Am Who I Am”: On the Perceived Threats to Personal Identity from Deep Brain Stimulation , 2011, Neuroethics.

[4]  C. Elliott Better Than Well: American Medicine Meets the American Dream , 2003 .

[5]  M. Merello,et al.  Deep Brain Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus for the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease , 2008 .

[6]  W. Hall,et al.  Drug-Induced Impulse Control Disorders: A Prospectus for Neuroethical Analysis , 2011 .

[7]  Felicitas Kraemer Me, Myself and My Brain Implant: Deep Brain Stimulation Raises Questions of Personal Authenticity and Alienation , 2011, Neuroethics.

[8]  R. Munhoz,et al.  Increased frequency and range of sexual behavior in a patient with Parkinson's disease after use of pramipexole: a case report. , 2009, The journal of sexual medicine.

[9]  Maartje Schermer Health, Happiness and Human Enhancement—Dealing with Unexpected Effects of Deep Brain Stimulation , 2013, Neuroethics.

[10]  Matthis Synofzik,et al.  Review Stimulating personality: Ethical criteria for deep brain stimulation in psychiatric patients and for enhancement purposes , 2022 .

[11]  O. Müller,et al.  Narrative Identität bei Therapie mit „Hirnschrittmacher“ , 2010, Ethik in der Medizin.

[12]  Pim Haselager,et al.  Did My Brain Implant Make Me Do It? Questions Raised by DBS Regarding Psychological Continuity, Responsibility for Action and Mental Competence , 2010, Neuroethics.

[13]  P. Kramer,et al.  Listening to Prozac , 1993 .

[14]  M. Schechtman Philosophical Reflections on Narrative and Deep Brain Stimulation , 2010, The Journal of Clinical Ethics.

[15]  C. Elliott,et al.  Free for All: Lessons from the RAND Health Insurance Experiment , 1994 .

[16]  Felicitas Kraemer Authenticity Anyone? The Enhancement of Emotions via Neuro-Psychopharmacology , 2010, Neuroethics.

[17]  W. Glannon Stimulating brains, altering minds , 2009, Journal of Medical Ethics.