A step towards improving workflow practices for volume crime investigations: outcomes of a 90-day trial in South Australia

Abstract The provision of forensic science services in volume crime investigations works most successfully as a partnership between police agencies and external forensic laboratories as opposed to a client/provider model where unlimited demand ignores finite resources. The principles of Lean Six Sigma have been applied in various laboratories to improve workflow through identification of wasteful work practices. These strategies are aimed at process optimisation through the application of triaging, a concept that has rarely been studied yet referenced strongly in the literature. The South Australia End to End 90-Day Trial: facilitating quicker justice through timely evidence processing, is a collaborative approach between South Australia Police and Forensic Science South Australia. This trial applied evidence-based policing principles, a law enforcement philosophy that uses research undertaken with scientific processes to inform law-enforcement decision-making. The results demonstrate how a review of processes and the removal of non-value adding activities can improve service delivery while not exhausting those ‘finite resources’.

[1]  Kevin J. Strom,et al.  Unanalyzed evidence in law-enforcement agencies: A national examination of forensic processing in police departments , 2010 .

[2]  Kevin M. Beaver.  The promises and pitfalls of forensic evidence in unsolved crimes , 2010 .

[3]  Christopher S. Koper,et al.  The Evidence-Based Policing Matrix , 2011 .

[4]  Richard Adderley,et al.  The Effects of Deprivation on the Time Spent Examining Crime Scenes and the Recovery of DNA and Fingerprints , 2008, Journal of forensic sciences.

[5]  Andrea L. Roth.  Database-driven investigations: The promise—and peril—of using forensics to solve no-suspect cases , 2010 .

[6]  John K. Roman.  The DNA Field Experiment: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Use of DNA in the Investigation of High-Volume Crimes , 2008 .

[7]  R. Julian,et al.  Forensic science as “risky business”: identifying key risk factors in the forensic process from crime scene to court , 2015 .

[8]  Anika Ludwig,et al.  Effective use of forensic science in volume crime investigations: identifying recurring themes in the literature. , 2014, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[9]  L. Sheridan,et al.  The Relationship Between the Detection of Acquisitive Crime by Forensic Science and Drug‐Dependent Offenders , 2007, Journal of forensic sciences.

[10]  M. Ivimey.  Annual report , 1958, IRE Transactions on Engineering Writing and Speech.

[11]  Troy O’Malley.  Forensic informatics enabling forensic intelligence , 2015 .

[12]  Harry Barton,et al.  ‘Lean’ policing? New approaches to business process improvement across the UK police service , 2013 .

[13]  Jennifer L. Doleac.  The Effects of DNA Databases on Crime , 2017 .

[14]  John W. Bond,et al.  A Novel Approach to Maximising the Detection of Volume Crime with DNA and Fingerprints , 2008 .

[15]  J. Payne,et al.  Recidivism in Australia: findings and future research , 2007 .

[16]  Alastair Ross,et al.  Benchmarking Forensic Performance in Australia–Volume Crime , 2014 .

[17]  Paul J. Speaker,et al.  Managing Performance in the Forensic Sciences: Expectations in Light of Limited Budgets , 2011 .