Robotic Spine Surgery and Augmented Reality Systems: A State of the Art

Instrumented spine procedures have been performed for decades to treat a wide variety of spinal disorders. New technologies have been employed to obtain a high degree of precision, to minimize risks of damage to neurovascular structures and to diminish harmful exposure of patients and the operative team to ionizing radiations. Robotic spine surgery comprehends 3 major categories: telesurgical robotic systems, robotic-assisted navigation (RAN) and virtual augmented reality (AR) systems, including AR and virtual reality. Telesurgical systems encompass devices that can be operated from a remote command station, allowing to perform surgery via instruments being manipulated by the robot. On the other hand, RAN technologies are characterized by the robotic guidance of surgeon-operated instruments based on real-time imaging. Virtual AR systems are able to show images directly on special visors and screens allowing the surgeon to visualize information about the patient and the procedure (i.e., anatomical landmarks, screw direction and inclination, distance from neurological and vascular structures etc.). The aim of this review is to focus on the current state of the art of robotics and AR in spine surgery and perspectives of these emerging technologies that hold promises for future applications.

[1]  Kevin T. Foley,et al.  Percutaneous spinal fixation simulation with virtual reality and haptics. , 2013, Neurosurgery.

[2]  Eyal Itshayek,et al.  Robot-Assisted Vertebral Body Augmentation: A Radiation Reduction Tool , 2014, Spine.

[3]  F. Charbel,et al.  Learning Retention of Thoracic Pedicle Screw Placement Using a High-Resolution Augmented Reality Simulator With Haptic Feedback , 2011, Neurosurgery.

[4]  A. R.,et al.  Review of literature , 1969, American Potato Journal.

[5]  Fabrizio Russo,et al.  Design of a positioning system for orienting surgical cannulae during Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery , 2016, 2016 6th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob).

[6]  Ramin Javan,et al.  Head-mounted display augmented reality to guide pedicle screw placement utilizing computed tomography , 2018, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[7]  Samuel K. Cho,et al.  Navigation and Robotics in Spinal Surgery: Where Are We Now? , 2017, Neurosurgery.

[8]  知秋.  Microsoft：微软“变脸” , 2006 .

[9]  D Accoto,et al.  A new surgical positioning system for robotic assisted minimally invasive spine surgery and transpedicular approach to the disc. , 2017, Journal of biological regulators and homeostatic agents.

[10]  Michael Söderman,et al.  Augmented Reality Surgical Navigation in Spine Surgery to Minimize Staff Radiation Exposure. , 2020, Spine.

[11]  G. Watanabe,et al.  [da Vinci surgical system]. , 2014, Kyobu geka. The Japanese journal of thoracic surgery.

[12]  Vincenzo Denaro,et al.  Biomechanical Evaluation of Transpedicular Nucleotomy With Intact Annulus Fibrosus , 2017, Spine.

[13]  Michael Söderman,et al.  Pedicle Screw Placement Using Augmented Reality Surgical Navigation With Intraoperative 3D Imaging , 2018, Spine.

[14]  Alexander Ghasem,et al.  The Arrival of Robotics in Spine Surgery: A Review of the Literature , 2018, Spine.

[15]  V. Rohde,et al.  Perioperative course and accuracy of screw positioning in conventional, open robotic-guided and percutaneous robotic-guided, pedicle screw placement , 2011, European Spine Journal.

[16]  T. Jahng,et al.  Minimally Invasive Robotic Versus Open Fluoroscopic-guided Spinal Instrumented Fusions: A Randomized Controlled Trial. , 2017, Spine.

[17]  Florentin Liebmann,et al.  Augmented Reality Navigation for Spinal Pedicle Screw Instrumentation using Intraoperative 3D Imaging. , 2020, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[18]  Yasuhiro Nakajima,et al.  Augmented Reality Visualization–guided Microscopic Spine Surgery: Transvertebral Anterior Cervical Foraminotomy and Posterior Foraminotomy , 2018, Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews.

[19]  Wei Tian,et al.  Internal fixation in upper cervical spinal surgery: a randomized controlled study , 2018 .

[20]  Sait Naderi,et al.  Robotic spine surgery: a preliminary report. , 2014, Turkish neurosurgery.

[21]  C. Raftopoulos,et al.  Spine Navigation Based on 3-Dimensional Robotic Fluoroscopy for Accurate Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement: A Prospective Study of 66 Consecutive Cases. , 2017, World neurosurgery.

[22]  R. Nachabe,et al.  Surgical Navigation Technology Based on Augmented Reality and Integrated 3D Intraoperative Imaging , 2016, Spine.

[23]  Alan H. Daniels,et al.  Computer‐assisted Orthopaedic Surgery , 2017, Orthopaedic surgery.

[24]  Marco Bernardini,et al.  The transpedicular approach for the study of intervertebral disc regeneration strategies: in vivo characterization , 2013, European Spine Journal.

[25]  Laura Snyder,et al.  A Quantitative Assessment of the Accuracy and Reliability of Robotically Guided Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement: Technique and Application Accuracy. , 2019, Operative neurosurgery.

[26]  Caterina Cuppari,et al.  BIOTECHNOLOGIES AND BIOMATERIALS IN SPINE SURGERY. , 2015 .

[27]  A. Giese,et al.  Navigation and Image Injection for Control of Bone Removal and Osteotomy Planes in Spine Surgery. , 2017, Operative neurosurgery.

[28]  Wei Tian,et al.  Robot‐assisted Percutaneous Transfacet Screw Fixation Supplementing Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Procedure: Accuracy and Safety Evaluation of This Novel Minimally Invasive Technique , 2019, Orthopaedic surgery.

[29]  Bo Liu,et al.  Safety and accuracy of robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-assisted pedicle screw insertion in thoracolumbar spinal surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial. , 2019, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[30]  Michel Lefranc,et al.  Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with the ROSATM Spine robot and intraoperative flat-panel CT guidance , 2016, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[31]  F. Auer,et al.  Accuracy of Robot-Assisted Placement of Lumbar and Sacral Pedicle Screws: A Prospective Randomized Comparison to Conventional Freehand Screw Implantation , 2012, Spine.

[32]  Sait Naderi,et al.  Robotic systems in spine surgery. , 2014, Turkish neurosurgery.

[33]  D. C. Henckel,et al.  Case report. , 1995, Journal.

[34]  A. Sanabria,et al.  Randomized controlled trial. , 2005, World journal of surgery.

[35]  C. Pfirrmann,et al.  Augmented Reality–Guided Lumbar Facet Joint Injections , 2018, Investigative radiology.

[36]  Ran Harel,et al.  Augmented reality-assisted pedicle screw insertion: a cadaveric proof-of-concept study. , 2019, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[37]  Yu Tang,et al.  Percutaneous placement of lumbar pedicle screws via intraoperative CT image-based augmented reality-guided technology. , 2019, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[38]  Neil R. Crawford,et al.  Pedicle screw accuracy in clinical utilization of minimally invasive navigated robot-assisted spine surgery , 2019, Journal of Robotic Surgery.

[39]  Mauro Alini,et al.  Clinically relevant hydrogel‐based on hyaluronic acid and platelet rich plasma as a carrier for mesenchymal stem cells: Rheological and biological characterization , 2017, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[40]  Chao Lu,et al.  Retrospective study , 2016, Medicine.

[41]  Luca Denaro,et al.  How to treat lumbar disc herniation in pregnancy? A systematic review on current standards , 2017, European Spine Journal.

[42]  Bernhard Meyer,et al.  First experience with the jump-starting robotic assistance device Cirq. , 2018, Neurosurgical focus.

[43]  Vincenzo Denaro,et al.  Spontaneous fusion of L5 spondyloptosis: should we learn from nature? , 2012, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[44]  Maryse Fortin,et al.  Use of Computer Assistance in Lumbar Fusion Surgery: Analysis of 15 222 Patients in the ACS-NSQIP Database , 2017, Global spine journal.

[45]  I. Lieberman,et al.  Robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement: lessons learned from the first 102 patients , 2013, European Spine Journal.

[46]  Veit Rohde,et al.  Unskilled unawareness and the learning curve in robotic spine surgery , 2015, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[47]  Neil Crawford,et al.  Navigated robotic assistance results in improved screw accuracy and positive clinical outcomes: an evaluation of the first 54 cases , 2019, Journal of Robotic Surgery.

[48]  D. Kendoff,et al.  Usefulness of a head mounted monitor device for viewing intraoperative fluoroscopy during orthopaedic procedures , 2008, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[49]  Mauro Alini,et al.  A Nucleotomy Model with Intact Annulus Fibrosus to Test Intervertebral Disc Regeneration Strategies. , 2015, Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods.

[50]  Wei Tian,et al.  Robot-Assisted Posterior C1–2 Transarticular Screw Fixation for Atlantoaxial Instability: A Case Report , 2016, Spine.

[51]  Florian Roser,et al.  Spinal robotics: current applications and future perspectives. , 2013, Neurosurgery.

[52]  V. Costalat,et al.  Robot-assisted spine surgery: feasibility study through a prospective case-matched analysis , 2016, European Spine Journal.

[53]  Christopher Nimsky,et al.  Implementation of augmented reality support in spine surgery , 2019, European Spine Journal.

[54]  Zoltán Papp,et al.  Minimally invasive spine surgery: systematic review , 2014, Neurosurgical Review.

[55]  Janna Friedly,et al.  Epidemiology of spine care: the back pain dilemma. , 2010, Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America.

[56]  Kade T. Huntsman,et al.  Robotic-assisted navigated minimally invasive pedicle screw placement in the first 100 cases at a single institution , 2019, Journal of robotic surgery.

[57]  C. Kepler,et al.  Intraoperative pedicle screw navigation does not significantly affect complication rates after spine surgery , 2018, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[58]  Gustav Burström,et al.  A Novel Augmented-Reality-Based Surgical Navigation System for Spine Surgery in a Hybrid Operating Room: Design, Workflow, and Clinical Applications. , 2020, Operative neurosurgery.

[59]  Nicholas Theodore,et al.  Technique: open lumbar decompression and fusion with the Excelsius GPS robot. , 2018, Neurosurgical focus.

[60]  Ho-Joong Kim,et al.  A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of robot‐assisted vs freehand pedicle screw fixation in spine surgery , 2017, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[61]  F. Wang,et al.  Precision insertion of percutaneous sacroiliac screws using a novel augmented reality-based navigation system: a pilot study , 2016, International Orthopaedics.

[62]  Michael Y. Wang,et al.  Initial academic experience and learning curve with robotic spine instrumentation. , 2017, Neurosurgical focus.

[63]  Xi Chen,et al.  Robot‐assisted vs freehand pedicle screw fixation in spine surgery – a systematic review and a meta‐analysis of comparative studies , 2018, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[64]  Fang Chen,et al.  Augmented reality surgical navigation with ultrasound-assisted registration for pedicle screw placement: a pilot study , 2017, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[65]  Peter J Morone,et al.  Trends for Spine Surgery for the Elderly: Implications for Access to Healthcare in North America. , 2015, Neurosurgery.

[66]  GradSibylle,et al.  A Nucleotomy Model with Intact Annulus Fibrosus to Test Intervertebral Disc Regeneration Strategies. , 2015 .

[67]  Gustav Burström,et al.  Augmented and Virtual Reality Instrument Tracking for Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: A Feasibility and Accuracy Study. , 2019, Spine.

[68]  Afshin Gangi,et al.  Augmented reality and artificial intelligence-based navigation during percutaneous vertebroplasty: a pilot randomised clinical trial , 2019, European Spine Journal.

[69]  Stefano Stramigioli,et al.  Clinical Pedicle Screw Accuracy and Deviation From Planning in Robot-Guided Spine Surgery: Robot-Guided Pedicle Screw Accuracy , 2015, Spine.

[70]  M Lefranc,et al.  Evaluation of the ROSA™ Spine robot for minimally invasive surgical procedures , 2016, Expert review of medical devices.

[71]  M. Hardenbrook,et al.  Clinical Acceptance and Accuracy Assessment of Spinal Implants Guided With SpineAssist Surgical Robot: Retrospective Study , 2010, Spine.

[72]  John Y. K. Lee,et al.  Minimally Invasive, Robot-Assisted, Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Technical Note , 2013, Journal of Neurological Surgery—Part A.

[73]  Thomas J. Vogl,et al.  Robot-assisted percutaneous placement of K-wires during minimally invasive interventions of the spine , 2018, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[74]  Allen L. Ho,et al.  Robotic-Assisted Spine Surgery: History, Efficacy, Cost, And Future Trends , 2019, Robotic surgery.

[75]  Arijitt Borthakur,et al.  Early Intervertebral Disc Degeneration Changes in Asymptomatic Weightlifters Assessed by T1&rgr;-Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2014, Spine.

[76]  D. Hao,et al.  Accuracy of pedicle screw placement comparing robot-assisted technology and the free-hand with fluoroscopy-guided method in spine surgery , 2018, Medicine.

[77]  Jing Zhang,et al.  Comparison of Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Insertion Among 4 Guided Technologies in Spine Surgery , 2017, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[78]  Asham Khan,et al.  Next-Generation Robotic Spine Surgery: First Report on Feasibility, Safety, and Learning Curve. , 2018, Operative neurosurgery.

[79]  Christopher Nimsky,et al.  Microscope-Based Augmented Reality in Degenerative Spine Surgery: Initial Experience. , 2019, World neurosurgery.

[80]  Michael Söderman,et al.  Feasibility and Accuracy of Thoracolumbar Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screw Placement With Augmented Reality Navigation Technology , 2018, Spine.

[81]  William J Beutler,et al.  The da Vinci Robotic Surgical Assisted Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technical Development and Case Report , 2013, Spine.

[82]  Joon S Yoo,et al.  The utility of virtual reality and augmented reality in spine surgery. , 2019, Annals of translational medicine.

[83]  G Vadalà,et al.  Autologous bone marrow concentrate combined with platelet-rich plasma enhance bone allograft potential to induce spinal fusion. , 2016, Journal of biological regulators and homeostatic agents.

[84]  Jang W Yoon,et al.  Technical feasibility and safety of an intraoperative head‐up display device during spine instrumentation , 2017, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[85]  R. Lehman,et al.  Image-Guided Navigation and Robotics in Spine Surgery. , 2019, Neurosurgery.

[86]  A. Bruskin,et al.  [Results of using Spine Assist Mazor in surgical treatment of spine disorders]. , 2014, Zhurnal voprosy neirokhirurgii imeni N. N. Burdenko.

[87]  Michael J Lee,et al.  The Current Role of Robotic Technology in Spine Surgery , 2017 .

[88]  Xiao-Guang Han,et al.  Guideline for Posterior Atlantoaxial Internal Fixation Assisted by Orthopaedic Surgical Robot , 2019, Orthopaedic surgery.

[89]  D. Hao,et al.  Radiological and clinical differences among three assisted technologies in pedicle screw fixation of adult degenerative scoliosis , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[90]  G Vadalà,et al.  Mesenchymal stem cells for intervertebral disc regeneration. , 2016, Journal of biological regulators and homeostatic agents.

[91]  Davide Scaramuzza,et al.  Pedicle screw navigation using surface digitization on the Microsoft HoloLens , 2019, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[92]  L Ambrosio,et al.  BIOTECHNOLOGIES AND BIOMATERIALS IN SPINE SURGERY. , 2015, Journal of biological regulators and homeostatic agents.

[93]  M. Liu,et al.  Expression profiles of SMAD1 protein in lung cancer tissues and normal tissues and its effect on lung cancer incidence. , 2016, Journal of biological regulators and homeostatic agents.

[94]  Michael Y. Wang,et al.  Workflow Caveats in Augmented Reality-Assisted Pedicle Instrumentation: Cadaver Lab. , 2019, World neurosurgery.

[95]  Doniel Drazin,et al.  Robotics and the spine: a review of current and ongoing applications. , 2014, Neurosurgical focus.

[96]  Florentin Liebmann,et al.  Augmented reality-assisted rod bending in spinal surgery. , 2019, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[97]  S J Zong,et al.  Total hip replacement for developmental dysplasia of hip and postoperative nursing. , 2016, Journal of biological regulators and homeostatic agents.