A dynamic mechanism for LQG power networks with random type parameters and pricing delay

We consider a dynamic game model of power networks with generators and/or consumers, called agents, and one public commission, called utility; a game with a prescribed dynamic mechanism is performed such that each agent decides a private control to minimize its own cost functional, and the utility manages information transmissions between the utility and agents and decides command signals, called prices, to minimize a public cost functional. We discuss designs of the mechanism that integrates strategic determinations of private controls by the agents into the optimal public controls that achieve the optimal social welfare and rational agents can accept. The model of this paper is a generic linear Gaussian model of power networks, which is motivated by so-called average system frequency models; in each model of the agents, we includes the type parameter presenting each agent's private information; we also consider the time delay in calculation of prices by utility. Assuming that each private cost functional as well as the public cost functional is quadratic, we derive formulas of the pricing schemes, and the incentive cost, inspired by the pivot function in the mechanism design theory literate from economics, that characterize our mechanism design in both formulations of the fixed horizon control and the receding horizon control cases.

[1]  W. Wonham Random differential equations in control theory , 1970 .

[2]  B. Jackson Time dependent quantum mechanical theory of gas-surface energy transfer , 1988 .

[3]  F. Schweppe,et al.  Real Time Pricing to Assist in Load Frequency Control , 1989, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[4]  F. Alvarado,et al.  Stability Analysis of Interconnected Power Systems Coupled with Market Dynamics , 2001, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[5]  B. Wollenberg,et al.  Application of mechanism design to electric power markets (Republished) , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[6]  W. S. Mota,et al.  Stability analysis of interconnected power systems coupled with market dynamics , 2001, 2002 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.02CH37309).

[7]  Khosrow Moslehi,et al.  Power System Control Centers: Past, Present, and Future , 2005, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[8]  R. Myerson Perspectives on Mechanism Design in Economic Theory , 2008 .

[9]  N. Nisan Introduction to Mechanism Design (for Computer Scientists) , 2007 .

[10]  Mircea Lazar,et al.  Real-time control of power systems using nodal prices , 2008 .

[11]  D. Parkes,et al.  Social welfare maximization in dynamic strategic decision problems , 2008 .

[12]  D. Bergemann,et al.  The Dynamic Pivot Mechanism , 2008 .

[13]  J. Nutaro,et al.  The Impact of Market Clearing Time and Price Signal Delay on the Stability of Electric Power Markets , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[14]  C. Langbort,et al.  On Real-Time Pricing for Strategic Agents , 2009 .

[15]  Na Li,et al.  Optimal demand response based on utility maximization in power networks , 2011, 2011 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[16]  Alfredo Vaccaro,et al.  Multiple-Energy Carriers: Modeling of Production, Delivery, and Consumption , 2011, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[17]  Pravin Varaiya,et al.  Smart Operation of Smart Grid: Risk-Limiting Dispatch , 2011, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[18]  Marija D Ilić,et al.  Dynamic Monitoring and Decision Systems for Enabling Sustainable Energy Services , 2011, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[19]  Takashi Tanaka,et al.  A dynamic pivot mechanism with application to real time pricing in power systems , 2012, 2012 American Control Conference (ACC).

[20]  A. Annaswamy,et al.  Wholesale Energy Market in a Smart Grid: A Discrete-Time Model and the Impact of Delays , 2012 .

[21]  M. Jackson Mechanism Theory , 2014 .