Heuristic for Combined Line Balancing and Worker Allocation in High Variability Production Lines

The manufacturing systems are generally categorized into machine-intensive and labor-intensive manufacturing systems. Worker allocation plays an important role in determining the efficiency of a labor intensive manufacturing system. All the efforts in literature are to the address the worker allocation problem in a deterministic condition. However, in many real labor-intensive manufacturing systems such as aircraft companies, there is a high degree of variability in workers’ processing time and quality of performance. Thus, in this paper a method for line balancing with variability in processing time is studied and compared to the ranked positional-weight method. Then, the model is extended further for a simultaneous line balancing and worker allocation in which workers’ different processing time and quality level come to play in a multiple task per station production line. The aim of this paper is to fill the gap between the two problems of line balancing and worker allocation in an uncertain environment by balancing the risk among the stations. Case studies were simulated using QUEST software and the result indicates that risk based allocation has increased throughput and efficiency of the manufacturing line compared to deterministic worker allocation.

[1]  Geetha Srinivasan,et al.  Static and dynamic operator allocation problems in cellular manufacturing systems , 1997 .

[2]  D A Nembhard,et al.  Heuristic approach for assigning workers to tasks based on individual learning rates , 2001 .

[3]  Gürsel A. Süer.  Optimal operator assignment and cell loading in labor-intensive manufacturing cells , 1996 .

[4]  Bopaya Bidanda,et al.  Worker assignment in cellular manufacturing considering technical and human skills , 2002 .

[5]  Vincent A. Mabert,et al.  Order Dispatching and Labor Assignment in Cellular Manufacturing Systems , 2000, Decis. Sci..

[6]  Geetha Srinivasan,et al.  Heuristics for operator allocation and sequencing in product-line-cells with manually operated machines , 1997 .

[7]  Taho Yang,et al.  A case study on the operator allocation decision for TFT‐LCD inspection and packaging process , 2006 .

[8]  Katsuhisa Ohno,et al.  An optimal worker allocation problem for a U-shaped production line , 1999 .

[9]  Hokey Min,et al.  Simultaneous formation of machine and human cells in group technology: a multiple objective approach , 1993 .

[10]  Kimberly P. Ellis,et al.  Development and application of a worker assignment model to evaluate a lean manufacturing cell , 2009 .

[11]  Gürsel A. Süer,et al.  Optimal operator assignment and cell loading when lot-splitting is allowed , 1998 .

[12]  John W. Fowler,et al.  Heuristics for workforce planning with worker differences , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Junzo Watada,et al.  Particle Swarm Optimization for Multi-function Worker Assignment Problem , 2009, KES.

[14]  Ronald G. Askin,et al.  Forming effective worker teams with multi-functional skill requirements , 2005, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[15]  Carlos Andrés,et al.  Branch and bound procedures for solving the Assembly Line Worker Assignment and Balancing Problem: Application to Sheltered Work centres for Disabled , 2008, Discret. Appl. Math..

[16]  Da Ruan,et al.  Data envelopment analysis based decision model for optimal operator allocation in CMS , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  M. B. Aryanezhad,et al.  Dynamic cell formation and the worker assignment problem: a new model , 2009 .

[18]  Ronald G. Askin,et al.  Forming effective worker teams for cellular manufacturing , 2001 .

[19]  Robert J. Wittrock.  Operator assignment and the parametric preflow algorithm , 1992 .

[20]  Gürsel A. Süer,et al.  Multi-period operator assignment considering skills, learning and forgetting in labour-intensive cells , 2008 .