In Vivo Biocompatibility of a Novel Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Suture for Annuloplasty

Abstract Background Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) is a suture material for annuloplasty in aortic valve repair. For this particular application, it should induce minimal local stress and promote rapid tissue incorporation. To achieve this, a novel ePTFE suture with a larger diameter and high porosity in its midsection has been developed. Herein, we analyzed the acute and chronic tissue reaction to this suture material compared with a commercially available control ePTFE suture. Methods Novel and control suture samples were implanted into dorsal skinfold chambers of BALB/c mice to analyze the early inflammatory response using intravital fluorescence microscopy over 14 days. Additional suture samples were implanted for 4 and 12 weeks in the flank musculature of mice and analyzed by histology and immunohistochemistry. Results The implantation of novel and control ePTFE suture into the dorsal skinfold chamber did not induce an acute inflammation, as indicated by physiological numbers of rolling and adherent leukocytes in all analyzed venules. Chronic implantation into the flank musculature showed a better tissue incorporation of the novel ePTFE suture with more infiltrating cells and a higher content of Sirius red+ collagen fibers when compared with controls. Cell proliferation and viability as well as numbers of recruited CD68+ macrophages, myeloperoxidase+ neutrophilic granulocytes and CD3+ lymphocytes did not significantly differ between the groups. Conclusion The novel ePTFE suture exhibits a good in vivo biocompatibility which is comparable to that of the control suture. Due to its improved tissue incorporation, it may provide a better long-term stability during annuloplasty.

[1]  H. Schäfers Aortic annuloplasty: The panacea of valve-preserving aortic replacement? , 2017, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[2]  A. Berrebi,et al.  Remodeling root repair with an external aortic ring annuloplasty , 2017, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[3]  R. Klopfleisch,et al.  The pathology of the foreign body reaction against biomaterials. , 2017, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[4]  H. Schäfers,et al.  Suture Annuloplasty Significantly Improves the Durability of Bicuspid Aortic Valve Repair. , 2017, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[5]  M. Menger,et al.  Perigraft vascularization and incorporation of implanted Dacron prostheses are affected by rifampicin coating. , 2016, Journal of vascular surgery.

[6]  M. Bischoff,et al.  Surface modification by plasma etching impairs early vascularization and tissue incorporation of porous polyethylene (Medpor® ) implants. , 2016, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[7]  M. Menger,et al.  The dorsal skinfold chamber: A versatile tool for preclinical research in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. , 2016, European cells & materials.

[8]  H. Schäfers,et al.  Suture Annuloplasty in Aortic Valve Repair. , 2016, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[9]  P. Noirhomme,et al.  The role of annular dimension and annuloplasty in tricuspid aortic valve repair. , 2016, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[10]  Ghassan Sleilaty,et al.  Surgical anatomy of the aortic annulus: landmarks for external annuloplasty in aortic valve repair. , 2015, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[11]  P. Noirhomme,et al.  Surgical anatomy of the aortic root: implication for valve-sparing reimplantation and aortic valve annuloplasty. , 2015, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[12]  T. Mittlmeier,et al.  New TiAg composite coating for bone prosthesis engineering shows promising microvascular compatibility in the murine dorsal skinfold chamber model , 2015, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine.

[13]  Alexander Berghaus,et al.  Biocompatibility of porous polyethylene implants tissue-engineered by extracellular matrix and VEGF. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[14]  B. Vollmar,et al.  In vivo analysis of biocompatibility and vascularization of the synthetic bone grafting substitute NanoBone. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[15]  D Eglin,et al.  In vivo biocompatibility and vascularization of biodegradable porous polyurethane scaffolds for tissue engineering. , 2009, Acta biomaterialia.

[16]  Alexander Schramm,et al.  Angiogenic and inflammatory response to biodegradable scaffolds in dorsal skinfold chambers of mice. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[17]  M. Menger,et al.  New experimental approach to study host tissue response to surgical mesh materials in vivo. , 2005, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[18]  M. Wimmer,et al.  Impact of a nickel-reduced stainless steel implant on striated muscle microcirculation: a comparative in vivo study. , 2001, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[19]  Robert H. Anderson,et al.  The surgical anatomy of the aortic root. , 2007, Multimedia manual of cardiothoracic surgery : MMCTS.

[20]  Stefan Langer,et al.  Neovascularization of poly(ether ester) block-copolymer scaffolds in vivo: long-term investigations using intravital fluorescent microscopy. , 2004, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[21]  M. Jünger,et al.  Cap Image - ein neuartiges computerunterstütztes Videobildanalysesystem für die dynamische Kapillarmikroskopie - Cap Image - A Newly-developed Computer-aided Videoframe Analysis System for Dynamic Capillaroscopy , 1997 .