Red potato chips: segmentation cues can substantially decrease food intake.

OBJECTIVE To discover a scalable method of food-packaging presentation, which can help reduce per occasion food consumption by making portions sizes more salient and segmented. METHODS Two studies of American undergraduates who ate from tubes of potato chips while watching a movie. In each study, participants ate chips that were either identical (the control group) or which had colored chips inserted at regular intervals (the treatment groups). One treatment group had a distinctively different (reddish) chip present at every 7th (Study 1) or 5th (Study 2) chip, and the 2nd treatment group had one present every 14th (Study 1) or 10th (Study 2) chip. Measures were the number of chips consumed and (in Study 1) the participants estimates of how many they believed they consumed. RESULTS In both studies, chip consumption was reduced by more than 50%, averaging across the 2 segmentation intervals, with no significant difference between the 2 intervals. Estimates of amount consumed were much more accurate when there was segmentation. CONCLUSION Segmenting a package effectively reduced consumption in the settings we have explored. Segmentation cues may operate by any or all of 3 mechanisms: (a) they call attention to and encourage better monitoring of eating, (b) they suggest smaller consumption (portion size) norms, or (c) they break automated eating sequences by introducing a pause. There is some evidence from the 1st study that provides evidence for the 1st, monitoring account.

[1]  P. Rozin,et al.  The Ecology of Eating , 2003, Psychological science.

[2]  D. Levitsky.  The non-regulation of food intake in humans: Hope for reversing the epidemic of obesity , 2005, Physiology & Behavior.

[3]  Pierre Chandon,et al.  Is Obesity Caused by Calorie Underestimation? A Psychophysical Model of Meal Size Estimation , 2007 .

[4]  B. Wansink.  Can Package Size Accelerate Usage Volume? , 1995 .

[5]  B. Rolls,et al.  The Effect of Large Portion Sizes on Energy Intake Is Sustained for 11 Days , 2007, Obesity.

[6]  Edmund T. Rolls,et al.  Sensory specific satiety in man , 1981, Physiology & Behavior.

[7]  J. Falk.  Physiology and Behavior. , 1973 .

[8]  J. Peters,et al.  Environmental contributions to the obesity epidemic. , 1998, Science.

[9]  Brian Wansink,et al.  Why Visual Cues of Portion Size May Influence Intake , 2004, Obesity research.

[10]  E. Ravussin,et al.  Increased food energy supply is more than sufficient to explain the US epidemic of obesity. , 2009, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[11]  Brian Wansink,et al.  Super Bowls: Serving Bowl Size and Food Consumption , 2005, JAMA.

[12]  Paul Rozin,et al.  Unit Bias , 2006, Psychological science.

[13]  K. Brownell,et al.  Eating disorders and obesity : a comprehensive handbook , 1995 .

[14]  Brian Wansink,et al.  Mindless Eating: Why We Eat More Than We Think , 2001 .

[15]  B. Wansink.  Environmental factors that increase the food intake and consumption volume of unknowing consumers. , 2004, Annual review of nutrition.