Carbon co-benefits of tighter SO2 and NOx regulations in China

Abstract Air pollution has been recognized as a significant problem in China. In its Twelfth Five Year Plan, China proposes to reduce SO 2 and NO x emissions significantly, and here we investigate the cost of achieving those reductions and the implications of doing so for CO 2 emissions. We extend the analysis through 2050, and either hold emissions policy targets at the level specified in the Plan, or continue to reduce them gradually. We apply a computable general equilibrium model of the Chinese economy that includes a representation of pollution abatement derived from detailed assessment of abatement technology and costs. We find that China's SO 2 and NO x emissions control targets would have substantial effects on CO 2 emissions leading to emissions savings far beyond those we estimate would be needed to meet its CO 2 intensity targets. However, the cost of achieving and maintaining the pollution targets can be quite high given the growing economy. In fact, we find that the near term pollution targets can be met while still expanding the use of coal, but if they are, then there is a lock-in effect that makes it more costly to maintain or further reduce emissions. That is, if firms were to look ahead to tighter targets, they would make different technology choices in the near term, largely turning away from increased use of coal immediately.

[1]  David G. Streets,et al.  Sulfur dioxide emissions in China and sulfur trends in East Asia since 2000 , 2010 .

[2]  G. Nemet,et al.  Implications of incorporating air-quality co-benefits into climate change policymaking , 2010 .

[3]  Shuxiao Wang,et al.  Plotting of Acid Rain and Sulfur Dioxide Pollution Control Zones and Integrated Control Planning in China , 2001 .

[4]  James R. McFarland,et al.  Technology and technical change in the MIT EPPA model , 2006 .

[5]  Michael B. McElroy,et al.  Constraint of anthropogenic NO x emissions in China from different sectors: a new methodology using multiple satellite retrievals , 2009 .

[6]  Valpergue de Masin,et al.  Economic modeling of urban pollution and climate policy interactions , 2003 .

[7]  Sergey Paltsev,et al.  The MIT Emissions Prediction and Policy Analysis (EPPA) Model: Version 4 , 2005 .

[8]  Fabian Wagner,et al.  GAINS - An Interactive Tool for Assessing International GHG Mitigation Regimes , 2011, ICT-GLOW.

[9]  T. Selden,et al.  Environmental Quality and Development: Is There a Kuznets Curve for Air Pollution Emissions? , 1994 .

[10]  Sergey Paltsev,et al.  Health damages from air pollution in China. , 2012 .

[11]  John M. Reilly,et al.  Modeling non-CO2 Greenhouse Gas Abatement , 2003 .

[12]  Scott E. Atkinson,et al.  Non-separable pollution control: Implications for a CO2 emissions cap and trade system , 2014 .

[13]  David I. Stern,et al.  Is there an environmental Kuznets curve for sulfur , 2001 .

[14]  Richard D. Morgenstern,et al.  The Ancillary Carbon Benefits of SO2 Reductions from a Small-Boiler Policy in Taiyuan, PRC , 2004 .

[15]  S. Paltsev,et al.  An analysis of US greenhouse gas cap-and-trade proposals using a forward-looking economic model , 2011, Environment and Development Economics.

[16]  D. Stern The Rise and Fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve , 2004 .

[17]  Caleb J. Waugh,et al.  An integrated assessment of air pollutant abatement opportunities in a computable general equilibrium framework , 2012 .