Cognition and Language: From Apprehension to Judgment -- Quantum Conjectures

We critically discuss the two moments of human cognition, namely, apprehension (A),whereby a coherent perception emerges from the recruitment of neuronal groups, and judgment(B),that entails the comparison of two apprehensions acquired at different times, coded in a suitable language and recalled by memory. (B) requires self-consciousness, in so far as the agent who expresses the judgment must be aware that the two apprehensions are submitted to his/her own scrutiny and that it is his/her duty to extract a mutual relation. Since (B) lasts around 3 seconds, the semantic value of the pieces under comparison must be decided within this time. This implies a fast search of the memory contents. As a fact, exploring human subjects with sequences of simple words, we find evidence of a limited time window , corresponding to the memory retrieval of a linguistic item in order to match it with the next one in a text flow (be it literary, or musical,or figurative). Classifying the information content of spike trains, an uncertainty relation emerges between the bit size of a word and its duration. This uncertainty is ruled by a quantum constant that can be given a numerical value and that has nothing to do with Planck’s constant. A quantum conjecture might explain the onset and decay of the memory window connecting successive pieces of a linguistic text. The conjecture here formulated is applicable to other reported evidences of quantum effects in human cognitive processes, so far lacking a plausible framework since no efforts to assign a quantum constant have been associated. Outline 1-Introduction on perception, judgment and self-consciousness 2The transition from apprehension to judgment 3-Role of the short term memory in linguistic elaboration 4-Quantum conjecture in the dynamics of neuronal synchronization 5Entropy of perceptions and quantum of action 6-Onset of the quantum behaviour 7-Comparison with other approaches to quantum cognition 8Current misunderstandings between apprehensions and judgments Bibliography This paper is a tribute to the late John S. Nicolis, a fine scientist who, already in the early 1980’s, has pioneered the application of chaotic dynamics to brain processes . A review of his approach is reported in [Nicolis]. [Contribution to the volume in honour of John S. Nicolis : Chaos, Information Processing and Paradoxical Games, G. Nicolis and V. Basios (eds), World Scientific, Singapore, 2013 ]

[1]  F. T. Arecchi,et al.  Dynamics of Consciousness Complexity and Creativity , 2010 .

[2]  F. Arecchi,et al.  Cognitive dynamics: complexity and creativity , 2007 .

[3]  On the quantal mechanism of neural transmitter release , 1999 .

[4]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Applications of Quantum Statistics in Psychological Studies of Decision Processes , 1995 .

[5]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Bose-Einstein condensation in complex networks. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[6]  H. Fröhlich Long Range Coherence and the Action of Enzymes , 1970, Nature.

[7]  Feature binding as neuron synchronization: Quantum aspects , 2005 .

[8]  J. Nicolis,et al.  Chaotic dynamics applied to information processing , 1986 .

[9]  F Tito Arecchi,et al.  Phenomenology of Consciousness : from Apprehension to Judgment , 2010 .

[10]  H. Stapp The importance of quantum decoherence in brain processes , 2000, quant-ph/0010029.

[11]  C. Koch,et al.  Consciousness and neuroscience. , 1998, Cerebral cortex.

[12]  Jonathan D. Victor,et al.  Metric-space analysis of spike trains: theory, algorithms and application , 1998, q-bio/0309031.

[13]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Quantum Structure in Cognition , 2008, 0805.3850.

[14]  W Singer,et al.  Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[15]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: interpretations and misinterpretations , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[16]  E. Pöppel Consciousness versus states of being conscious , 1997, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[17]  William Bialek,et al.  Spikes: Exploring the Neural Code , 1996 .

[18]  B. Libet,et al.  Subjective Referral of the Timing for a Conscious Sensory Experience , 1979 .

[19]  Joseph P. Zbilut,et al.  Some remarks on an experiment suggesting quantum-like behavior of cognitive entities and formulation of an abstract quantum mechanical formalism to describe cognitive entity and its dynamics , 2007 .

[20]  S. F. Abdalah,et al.  Excitability of periodic and chaotic attractors in semiconductor lasers with optoelectronic feedback , 2010 .

[21]  William Bialek,et al.  Entropy and Information in Neural Spike Trains , 1996, cond-mat/9603127.

[22]  G. Vitiello My double unveiled , 2001 .

[23]  Max Tegmark,et al.  The importance of quantum decoherence in brain processes , 1999, ArXiv.

[24]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Ubiquitous Quantum Structure: From Psychology to Finance , 2010 .

[25]  Fortunato Tito Arecchi,et al.  Chaotic Neuron Dynamics, Synchronization, and Feature Binding , 2003, Summer School on Neural Networks.

[26]  S. Hameroff,et al.  Quantum computation in brain microtubules: decoherence and biological feasibility. , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[27]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .

[28]  Jerome R. Busemeyer,et al.  Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision , 2012 .

[29]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Can Quantum Information be Processed by Macroscopic Systems? , 2007, Quantum Inf. Process..

[30]  R. Penrose,et al.  Shadows of the Mind , 1994 .

[31]  F. Arecchi Physics of cognition: Complexity and creativity , 2007 .

[32]  F T Arecchi,et al.  Synchronization of homoclinic chaos. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[33]  Patrick Suppes,et al.  Quantum mechanics, interference, and the brain , 2009 .

[34]  J. Mayer,et al.  On the Quantum Correction for Thermodynamic Equilibrium , 1947 .

[35]  F T Arecchi,et al.  Mixed-mode oscillations via canard explosions in light-emitting diodes with optoelectronic feedback. , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[36]  Garg,et al.  Quantum mechanics versus macroscopic realism: Is the flux there when nobody looks? , 1985, Physical review letters.

[37]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[38]  D. Hubel Eye, brain, and vision , 1988 .

[39]  E. Pöppel,et al.  A hierarchical model of temporal perception , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[40]  C. Koch,et al.  Quantum mechanics in the brain , 2006, Nature.

[41]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: basic evidence and a workspace framework , 2001, Cognition.

[42]  E. Pöppel Lost in time: a historical frame, elementary processing units and the 3-second window. , 2004, Acta neurobiologiae experimentalis.

[43]  D. Noton,et al.  Eye movements and visual perception. , 1971, Scientific American.

[44]  Stefano Euzzor,et al.  Noise and coupling induced synchronization in a network of chaotic neurons , 2013, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul..

[45]  A. M. Turing,et al.  Computing Machinery and Intelligence , 1950, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.