Modeling walkability: the effects of street design, street-network configuration and land-use on pedestrian movement

This study explores the relative association of street design –local qualities of street environment–, street network configuration –spatial structure of the urban grid–, and land use patterns with the distribution of pedestrian flows. The aim is to better understand the extent to which systematically measured street-level urban design qualities and objectively measured street network configuration are related to pedestrian movement, controlling for land use. 20 2kmx2km areas in Istanbul were studied in order to establish correlations between street design, street configuration and densities of pedestrian movement. Pedestrian data were collected on selected road segments within the areas. Same road segments were characterized through detailed field-surveys in terms of aesthetic qualities, signage, sidewalk design, pedestrian crossings/traffic lights, ground floor uses as well as GIS-based hosing plot-level (parcel-level) land use density and street-level topography. Street network configurations within the areas were evaluated using angular segment analysis (Integration and Choice) as well as two segment-based connectivity measures (Metric and Directional Reach). Linear models were developed to investigate the relationships among street design, street network configuration, land use, and walking behavior. This study contributes to the literature by offering insights into the comparative roles of urban design qualities of the street environment and street network layout on pedestrian movement. Preliminary findings imply that notwithstanding the significance of certain aspects of the street environment that relate to local urban design qualities, the overall spatial configuration of street network may prove to be a significant variable for the description and modulation of pedestrian movement.

[1]  Ronald Wiedenhaft Cities for People , 1981 .

[2]  P. Mokhtarian,et al.  Do changes in neighborhood characteristics lead to changes in travel behavior? A structural equations modeling approach , 2007 .

[3]  R. Ewing,et al.  Best Development Practices , 1996 .

[4]  John Peponis,et al.  The Connectivity of Streets: Reach and Directional Distance , 2008 .

[5]  R. Cervero,et al.  TRAVEL DEMAND AND THE 3DS: DENSITY, DIVERSITY, AND DESIGN , 1997 .

[6]  Robert Cervero,et al.  Built environments and mode choice: toward a normative framework , 2002 .

[7]  J. Sallis,et al.  Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: Findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures , 2003, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[8]  Ann Forsyth,et al.  Relation of modifiable neighborhood attributes to walking. , 2008, Preventive medicine.

[9]  K. Shriver Influence of Environmental Design on Pedestrian Travel Behavior in Four Austin Neighborhoods , 1997 .

[10]  J F Sallis,et al.  Behavioral epidemiology: A systematic framework to classify phases of research on health promotion and disease prevention , 2000, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[11]  K. Krizek Residential Relocation and Changes in Urban Travel: Does Neighborhood-Scale Urban Form Matter? , 2003 .

[12]  Alan Penn,et al.  Natural Movement: Or, Configuration and Attraction in Urban Pedestrian Movement , 1993 .

[13]  B. Giles-Corti,et al.  Personal, family, social, and environmental correlates of active commuting to school. , 2006, American journal of preventive medicine.

[14]  A. Georgopoulos,et al.  Mental Maze Solving , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  Brian Grady,et al.  Travel Demand Modeling for Regional Visioning and Scenario Analysis , 2005 .

[16]  J. Prochaska,et al.  A review of correlates of physical activity of children and adolescents. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[17]  C. Bhat,et al.  Assessing Impact of Urban Form Measures on Nonwork Trip Mode Choice After Controlling for Demographic and Level-of-Service Effects , 2003 .

[18]  P. Jansen-Osmann,et al.  The Influence of Turns on Distance Cognition , 2004 .

[19]  Michael J. Greenwald,et al.  The Built Environment as a Determinant of Walking Behavior: Analyzing Non-Work Pedestrian Travel in Portland, Oregon , 2001 .

[20]  Tao Yang,et al.  Normalising least angle choice in Depthmap - and how it opens up new perspectives on the global and local analysis of city space , 2012 .

[21]  Asha Weinstein Agrawal,et al.  How Far, by Which Route and Why? A Spatial Analysis of Pedestrian Preference , 2007 .

[22]  Anne Vernez Moudon,et al.  The 3Ds + R: Quantifying Land Use and Urban Form Correlates of Walking , 2006 .

[23]  K. Bartholomew,et al.  Making the land use, transportation, air quality connection , 1993 .

[24]  Susan L Handy,et al.  METHODOLOGIES FOR EXPLORING THE LINK BETWEEN URBAN FORM AND TRAVEL BEHAVIOR , 1996 .

[25]  Mariela Alfonzo,et al.  Evaluation of the California Safe Routes to School legislation: urban form changes and children's active transportation to school. , 2005, American journal of preventive medicine.

[26]  Lawrence D. Frank,et al.  Land Use and Transportation Interaction , 2000 .

[27]  B. Giles-Corti,et al.  The relative influence of individual, social and physical environment determinants of physical activity. , 2002, Social science & medicine.

[28]  G. Schofield,et al.  Transport, urban design, and physical activity: an evidence-based update , 2005 .

[29]  Carol M. Werner,et al.  Walkable Route Perceptions and Physical Features , 2007 .

[30]  Daniel A. Rodriguez,et al.  The relationship between non-motorized mode choice and the local physical environment , 2004 .

[31]  J. Gehl,et al.  Close encounters with buildings , 2006 .

[32]  M. Boarnet,et al.  Can Land Use Policy Really Affect Travel Behavior? A Study of the Link between Non-Work Travel and Land Use Characteristics , 1996 .

[33]  Susan L Handy,et al.  Measuring the Unmeasurable: Urban Design Qualities Related to Walkability , 2009 .

[34]  R. Cervero,et al.  Travel Choices in Pedestrian Versus Automobile Oriented Neighborhoods - eScholarship , 1995 .

[35]  E. Sadalla,et al.  The Perception of Traversed Distance , 1980 .

[36]  Jan Gehl,et al.  Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space , 2003 .

[37]  Marlon G. Boarnet,et al.  The Relationship of Neighbourhood Built Environment Features and Adult Parents' Walking , 2008 .

[38]  S. Handy Regional Versus Local Accessibility: Neo-Traditional Development and Its Implications for Non-work Travel , 1992 .

[39]  Kelly J. Clifton,et al.  Evaluating neighborhood accessibility: possibilities and practicalities , 2001 .

[40]  K. Stanilov,et al.  Site Design and Pedestrian Travel , 1999 .

[41]  Xuemei Zhu,et al.  Beyond Distance: Children’s School Travel Mode Choice , 2013, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[42]  J. Sallis,et al.  Assessing perceived physical environmental variables that may influence physical activity. , 1997, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[43]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Relationship between urban sprawl and weight of United States youth. , 2006, American journal of preventive medicine.

[44]  Bill Hillier,et al.  Network effects and psychological effects: a theory of urban movement , 2005 .

[45]  N. Owen,et al.  Environmental factors associated with adults' participation in physical activity: a review. , 2002, American journal of preventive medicine.

[46]  Ted M. Matley,et al.  Pedestrian Travel Potential in Northern New Jersey: A Metropolitan Planning Organization’s Approach to Identifying Investment Priorities , 2000 .

[47]  J N Bailenson,et al.  The initial segment strategy: A heuristic for route selection , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[48]  L. Frank,et al.  Impacts of Mixed Use and Density on Utilization of Three Modes of Travel: Single-Occupant Vehicle, Transit, and Walking , 1994 .