A Human-Centered Design Process for Developing Non-Humanoid Social Robotic (NH-SR) Work and Exercise Environment

The iWEE, is a non-humanoid social robotic system that recognizes office workers' limited movement, e.g., sitting for more than an hour, combines this information with their meditation and/or exercise preferences, and in response prompts them to engage in periodic whole-body movement activity breaks. The iWEE' robotic systems sense users' movements, assess the users' states, and reconfigure to encourage exercise by actuating its different spatial sensory cues, i.e., form, sound and color. The iWEE also employs architectural conventions, providing different configurations to encourage movement of different muscle groups. iWEE's users interact with the robotic system using for example touch, proximity and/or infrared sensors, or by using push buttons located at the iWEE's spatial interface. The cyber physical system are iteratively designed, prototyped, and empirically evaluated at different scales.

[1]  C. Lavie,et al.  Global physical activity levels - Need for intervention. , 2019, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[2]  Henriette Bier,et al.  Adaptive building-skin components as context-aware nodes in an extended cyber-physical network , 2016, 2016 IEEE 3rd World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT).

[3]  W. Mechelen,et al.  The economic burden of physical inactivity: a global analysis of major non-communicable diseases , 2016, The Lancet.

[4]  D. Alter,et al.  Sedentary Time and Its Association With Risk for Disease Incidence, Mortality, and Hospitalization in Adults , 2015, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[5]  Daniel Cardoso Llach,et al.  Typologies of architectural interaction: a social dimension , 2014, ANSS 2014.

[6]  Mohammad Javad Koohsari,et al.  Sedentary behaviour and health: mapping environmental and social contexts to underpin chronic disease prevention , 2014, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[7]  H. P. van der Ploeg,et al.  Daily Sitting Time and All-Cause Mortality: A Meta-Analysis , 2013, PloS one.

[8]  Toni Robertson,et al.  Moving and making strange: An embodied approach to movement-based interaction design , 2013, TCHI.

[9]  Shigeru Inoue,et al.  The pandemic of physical inactivity: global action for public health , 2012, The Lancet.

[10]  Maria Hagströmer,et al.  The descriptive epidemiology of sitting. A 20-country comparison using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). , 2011, American journal of preventive medicine.

[11]  Kim Goodwin,et al.  Designing for the Digital Age: How to Create Human-Centered Products and Services , 2009 .

[12]  G. Pugliese,et al.  Severe Streptococcus pyogenes Infections, United Kingdom, 2003–2004 , 2008, Emerging infectious diseases.

[13]  Jules Moloney,et al.  Between Art and Architecture: The Interactive Skin , 2006, Tenth International Conference on Information Visualisation (IV'06).

[14]  J. B. Brooke,et al.  SUS: A 'Quick and Dirty' Usability Scale , 1996 .

[15]  E. Babbie The practice of social research , 1969 .

[16]  K. Green Ecosystems of Bits, Bytes, and Biology , 2016 .

[17]  이상희 Interactive Architecture의 상호작용성에 관한 연구 , 2011 .

[18]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Where the action is , 2001 .

[19]  Abbas Tashakkori,et al.  Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 1998 .

[20]  Bruce C. Straits,et al.  Approaches to social research , 1993 .