A new full waveform inversion method based on shifted correlation of the envelope and its implementation based on OPENCL

Abstract Standard full waveform inversion (FWI) attempts to minimize the difference between observed and modeled data. When the initial velocity is kinematically accurate, FWI often converges to the best velocity model, usually of a high-resolution nature. However, when the modeled data using an initial velocity is far from the observed data, conventional local gradient based methods converge to a solution near the initial velocity instead of the global minimum. This is known as the cycle-skipping problem, which results in a zero correlation when observed and modeled data are not correlated. To reduce the cycle-skipping problem, we compare the envelope of the modeled and observed data instead of comparing the modeled and observed data directly. However, if the initial velocity is not sufficient, the correlation of the envelope of the modeled and observed data might still be zero. To mitigate this issue, we propose to maximize both the zero-lag correlation of the envelope and the non-zero-lag correlations of the envelope. A weighting function with maximum value at zero lag and decays away from zero lag is introduced to balance the role of the lags. The resulting objective function is less sensitive to the choice of the maximum lag allowed and has a wider region of convergence with respect to standard FWI and envelope inversions. The implementation has the same computational complexity as conventional FWI as the only difference in the calculation is related to a modified adjoint source. The implementation of this algorithm was performed on an AMD GPU platform based on OPENCL and provided a 14 times speedup over a CPU implementation based on OPENMP. Several numerical examples are shown to demonstrate the proper convergence of the proposed method. Application to the Marmousi model shows that this method converges starting with a linearly increasing velocity model, even with data free of frequencies below 3 Hz.

[1]  Tariq Alkhalifah,et al.  Simultaneous inversion of the background velocity and the perturbation in full-waveform inversion , 2015 .

[2]  Gerard T. Schuster,et al.  Wave-equation traveltime inversion , 1991 .

[3]  T. Alkhalifah,et al.  Selective data extension for full-waveform inversion: An efficient solution for cycle skipping , 2018 .

[4]  Yunseok Choi,et al.  Application of multi‐source waveform inversion to marine streamer data using the global correlation norm , 2012 .

[5]  J. Tromp,et al.  3D elastic full-waveform inversion of surface waves in the presence of irregular topography using an envelope-based misfit function , 2018 .

[6]  Scott A. Morton,et al.  Differential Semblance Velocity Analysis by Wave Equation Migration, Applications to High Resolution HAFB Dataset , 2003 .

[7]  Bjorn Engquist,et al.  Application of optimal transport and the quadratic Wasserstein metric to full-waveform inversion , 2016, 1612.05075.

[8]  Wenyi Hu FWI Without Low Frequency Data - Beat Tone Inversion , 2014 .

[9]  Liangguo Dong,et al.  Full waveform inversion method using envelope objective function without low frequency data , 2014 .

[10]  Ludovic Métivier,et al.  Measuring the misfit between seismograms using an optimal transport distance: application to full waveform inversion , 2016 .

[11]  Guanquan Zhang,et al.  Fundamental Issues in Full Waveform Inversion , 2012 .

[12]  Ju-Won Oh,et al.  Full waveform inversion using envelope-based global correlation norm , 2018 .

[13]  Paul Sava,et al.  Wave-equation migration velocity analysis. I. Theory , 2004 .

[14]  Ru-Shan Wu,et al.  Seismic envelope inversion and modulation signal model , 2014 .

[15]  Mrinal K. Sen,et al.  A hybrid scheme for absorbing edge reflections in numerical modeling of wave propagation , 2010 .

[16]  Yunseok Choi,et al.  Unwrapped phase inversion with an exponential damping , 2015 .

[17]  Robert G. Clapp,et al.  Random boundary condition for memory-efficient waveform inversion gradient computation , 2015 .

[18]  Guanghui Huang,et al.  Full Waveform Inversion via Matched Source Extension , 2015 .

[19]  B. Biondi,et al.  Simultaneous Inversion of Full Data Bandwidth by Tomographic Full Waveform Inversion , 2014 .

[20]  R. Plessix A review of the adjoint-state method for computing the gradient of a functional with geophysical applications , 2006 .

[21]  Yu Zhang,et al.  Inversion on Reflected Seismic Wave , 2012 .

[22]  Liangguo Dong,et al.  Correlation-based reflection full-waveform inversion , 2015 .

[23]  Hongbo Bi,et al.  Impact of adaptive data selection on full waveform inversion , 2014 .

[24]  William W. Symes,et al.  Migration velocity analysis and waveform inversion , 2008 .

[25]  Dave Hale,et al.  Wave-equation reflection traveltime inversion with dynamic warping and full-waveform inversion , 2013 .

[26]  J. Tromp,et al.  Misfit functions for full waveform inversion based on instantaneous phase and envelope measurements , 2011 .

[27]  Elastic Full Waveform Inversion with envelope based misfit function , 2015 .

[28]  Gerard T. Schuster,et al.  Image-domain full waveform inversion , 2013 .

[29]  Wim A. Mulder,et al.  A correlation-based misfit criterion for wave-equation traveltime tomography , 2010 .

[30]  A. Tarantola Inversion of seismic reflection data in the acoustic approximation , 1984 .

[31]  Guoxin Chen,et al.  Multi-scale signed envelope inversion , 2018, Journal of Applied Geophysics.

[32]  Q. Guo,et al.  Elastic reflection-based waveform inversion with a nonlinear approach , 2017 .

[33]  Chao Huang,et al.  Elastic envelope inversion using multicomponent seismic data with filtered-out low frequencies , 2015, Applied Geophysics.

[34]  W. Symes,et al.  Angle‐domain common‐image gathers for migration velocity analysis by wavefield‐continuation imaging , 2004 .

[35]  Tariq Alkhalifah,et al.  The natural combination of full and image-based waveform inversion , 2016 .

[36]  Denes Vigh,et al.  Adjustive full waveform inversion , 2015 .

[37]  Feng Chen,et al.  Reflection-based Full Waveform Inversion (RFWI) in the frequency domain , 2013 .

[38]  Ru-Shan Wu,et al.  Seismic envelope inversion: reduction of local minima and noise resistance , 2015 .

[39]  Laurent Demanet,et al.  Full-waveform inversion with extrapolated low-frequency data , 2016 .

[40]  Tariq Alkhalifah,et al.  The optimized gradient method for full waveform inversion and its spectral implementation , 2016 .

[41]  T. Alkhalifah,et al.  Multiscattering inversion for low-model wavenumbers , 2016 .

[42]  C. Shin,et al.  Waveform inversion in the Laplace domain , 2008 .

[43]  Jean Virieux,et al.  An overview of full-waveform inversion in exploration geophysics , 2009 .

[44]  T. Alkhalifah,et al.  Migration velocity analysis using pre‐stack wave fields , 2017 .

[45]  Romain Brossier,et al.  Full waveform inversion of diving & reflected waves for velocity model building with impedance inversion based on scale separation , 2015 .