Impacts of transportation sector emissions on future U.S. air quality in a changing climate. Part I: Projected emissions, simulation design, and model evaluation.

Emissions from the transportation sector are rapidly changing worldwide; however, the interplay of such emission changes in the face of climate change are not as well understood. This two-part study examines the impact of projected emissions from the U.S. transportation sector (Part I) on ambient air quality in the face of climate change (Part II). In Part I of this study, we describe the methodology and results of a novel Technology Driver Model (see graphical abstract) that includes 1) transportation emission projections (including on-road vehicles, non-road engines, aircraft, rail, and ship) derived from a dynamic technology model that accounts for various technology and policy options under an IPCC emission scenario, and 2) the configuration/evaluation of a dynamically downscaled Weather Research and Forecasting/Community Multiscale Air Quality modeling system. By 2046-2050, the annual domain-average transportation emissions of carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NOx), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), ammonia (NH3), and sulfur dioxide (SO2) are projected to decrease over the continental U.S. The decreases in gaseous emissions are mainly due to reduced emissions from on-road vehicles and non-road engines, which exhibit spatial and seasonal variations across the U.S. Although particulate matter (PM) emissions widely decrease, some areas in the U.S. experience relatively large increases due to increases in ship emissions. The on-road vehicle emissions dominate the emission changes for CO, NOx, VOC, and NH3, while emissions from both the on-road and non-road modes have strong contributions to PM and SO2 emission changes. The evaluation of the baseline 2005 WRF simulation indicates that annual biases are close to or within the acceptable criteria for meteorological performance in the literature, and there is an overall good agreement in the 2005 CMAQ simulations of chemical variables against both surface and satellite observations.

[1]  J. Lamarque,et al.  The impact of emission and climate change on ozone in the United States under representative concentration pathways (RCPs). , 2013, Atmospheric chemistry and physics.

[2]  Christine Wiedinmyer,et al.  A Preliminary Synthesis of Modeled Climate Change Impacts on U.S. Regional Ozone Concentrations , 2009 .

[3]  Yang Zhang,et al.  Decadal application of WRF/chem for regional air quality and climate modeling over the U.S. under the representative concentration pathways scenarios. Part 2: Current vs. future simulations , 2017 .

[4]  D. Streets,et al.  Global emission projections for the transportation sector using dynamic technology modeling , 2013 .

[5]  Tami C. Bond,et al.  Global emission projections of particulate matter (PM): I. Exhaust emissions from on-road vehicles , 2011 .

[6]  Daven K. Henze,et al.  Ammonia emissions in the United States, European Union, and China derived by high‐resolution inversion of ammonium wet deposition data: Interpretation with a new agricultural emissions inventory (MASAGE_NH3) , 2014 .

[7]  Yun Fat Lam,et al.  Impacts of future climate change and effects of biogenic emissions on surface ozone and particulate matter concentrations in the United States , 2011 .

[8]  Veerabhadra R. Kotamarthi,et al.  High‐resolution dynamically downscaled projections of precipitation in the mid and late 21st century over North America , 2015 .

[9]  Xin‐Zhong Liang,et al.  Sensitivity of U.S. surface ozone to future emissions and climate changes , 2007 .

[10]  John P. Dawson,et al.  Impacts of climate change on regional and urban air quality in the eastern United States: Role of meteorology , 2009 .

[11]  B. Lamb,et al.  The effects of global change upon United States air quality , 2014 .

[12]  B. Lamb,et al.  Attribution of projected changes in summertime US ozone and PM 2.5 concentrations to global changes , 2009 .

[13]  Tanya L. Spero,et al.  The geographic distribution and economic value of climate change-related ozone health impacts in the United States in 2030 , 2015, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[14]  Zhenhong Lin,et al.  How uncertain is the future of electric vehicle market: Results from Monte Carlo simulations using a nested logit model , 2017 .

[15]  L. Mickley,et al.  Linking global to regional models to assess future climate impacts on surface ozone levels in the United States , 2008 .

[16]  C. Rosenzweig,et al.  Simulating changes in regional air pollution over the eastern United States due to changes in global and regional climate and emissions , 2004 .

[17]  Alexei G. Sankovski,et al.  Special report on emissions scenarios : a special report of Working group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2000 .

[18]  D. Streets,et al.  Impacts of transportation sector emissions on future U.S. air quality in a changing climate. Part II: Air quality projections and the interplay between emissions and climate change. , 2018, Environmental pollution.

[19]  William C. Skamarock,et al.  A time-split nonhydrostatic atmospheric model for weather research and forecasting applications , 2008, J. Comput. Phys..

[20]  Armistead G Russell,et al.  Regional air quality management aspects of climate change: impact of climate mitigation options on regional air emissions. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  Yang Liu,et al.  Projected changes of extreme weather events in the eastern United States based on a high resolution climate modeling system , 2012 .

[22]  Jian He,et al.  Decadal application of WRF/Chem for regional air quality and climate modeling over the U.S. under the representative concentration pathways scenarios. Part 1: Model evaluation and impact of downscaling , 2017 .

[23]  Noelle E Selin,et al.  U.S. Air Quality and Health Benefits from Avoided Climate Change under Greenhouse Gas Mitigation. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[24]  D. Byun,et al.  Review of the Governing Equations, Computational Algorithms, and Other Components of the Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System , 2006 .

[25]  B. Lamb,et al.  Attribution of projected changes in U.S. ozone and PM2.5 concentrations to global changes , 2008 .

[26]  Daniel J. Jacob,et al.  Effect of Climate Change on Air Quality , 2009 .

[27]  Ying-Hwa Kuo,et al.  Research Needs and Directions of Regional Climate Modeling Using WRF and CCSM , 2006 .

[28]  Daniel J. Jacob,et al.  Correlations between fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and meteorological variables in the United States: implications for the sensitivity of PM2.5 to climate change. , 2010 .

[29]  J. Alcamo IMAGE 2.0 : integrated modeling of global climate change , 1994 .

[30]  John H. Seinfeld,et al.  Effect of changes in climate and emissions on future sulfate-nitrate-ammonium aerosol levels in the United States: FUTURE INORGANIC AEROSOLS IN THE U.S. , 2009 .

[31]  Jenny L. Hand,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Trends in PM2.5 Organic and Elemental Carbon across the United States , 2013 .

[32]  Yang Zhang,et al.  Impacts of future climate and emission changes on U.S. air quality , 2014 .

[33]  M. J. Hutzler,et al.  Emissions of greenhouse gases in the United States , 1995 .

[34]  Daniel H. Loughlin,et al.  ESP v2.0: enhanced method for exploring emission impacts of future scenarios in the United States – addressing spatial allocation , 2015 .

[35]  G. Powers,et al.  A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 3 , 2008 .

[36]  A. Russell,et al.  Downscaling a global climate model to simulate climate change over the US and the implication on regional and urban air quality , 2013 .

[37]  David S. Lee,et al.  Historical (1850–2000) gridded anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions of reactive gases and aerosols: methodology and application , 2010 .