Improved Estimation of Regional Surface Mass Variations from GRACE Intersatellite Geopotential Differences Using a Priori Constraints

We presented an improved method for estimation of regional surface mass variations from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE)-derived precise intersatellite geopotential differences using a priori constraints. An alternative analytic formula was proposed to incorporate the K-band ranging (KBR) range rate into the improved energy balance equation, and precise geopotential differences were estimated from GRACE Level-1B data based on the remove-compute-restore (RCR) technique, which avoids the long-wavelength gravity signals being absorbed by empirical parameters. To reduce the ill condition for inversion of regional mass variations from geopotential differences, a priori information from hydrological models was used to construct the constraint equations, and the optimal regularization parameters were adaptively determined based on iterative least-squares estimation. To assess our improved method, a case study of regional mass variations’ inversion was carried out over South America on 2◦ × 2◦ grids at monthly intervals from January 2005 to December 2010. The results show that regional mascon solutions inverted from geopotential differences estimated by the RCR technique using hydrological models as a priori constraints can retain more signal energy and enhance regional mass variation inversion. The spatial distributions and annual amplitudes of geopotential difference-based regional mascon solutions agree well with the official GRACE mascon solutions, although notable differences exist in spatial patterns and trends, especially in small basins. In addition, our improved method can robustly estimate the mascon solutions, which are less affected by the a priori information. The results from the case study have clearly demonstrated the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method.

[1]  N. Sneeuw.  A Semi-Analytical Approach to Gravity Field Analysis from Satellite Observations , 2000 .

[2]  P. Kuchynka,et al.  The Planetary and Lunar Ephemerides DE430 and DE431 , 2014 .

[3]  J. Kusche,et al.  Regularization of geopotential determination from satellite data by variance components , 2002 .

[4]  Frédéric Frappart,et al.  Validation of GRACE-derived terrestrial water storage from a regional approach over South America , 2013 .

[5]  W. Tad Pfeffer,et al.  Recent contributions of glaciers and ice caps to sea level rise , 2012, Nature.

[6]  Jing Guo,et al.  GRACE gravity field modeling with an investigation on correlation between nuisance parameters and gravity field coefficients , 2011 .

[7]  S. Luthcke,et al.  Improved Earth Oblateness Rate Reveals Increased Ice Sheet Losses and Mass‐Driven Sea Level Rise , 2019, Geophysical Research Letters.

[8]  F. Bryan,et al.  Time variability of the Earth's gravity field: Hydrological and oceanic effects and their possible detection using GRACE , 1998 .

[9]  M. Watkins,et al.  Quantifying and reducing leakage errors in the JPL RL05M GRACE mascon solution , 2016 .

[10]  Qile Zhao,et al.  DEOS Mass Transport model (DMT-1) based on GRACE satellite data: methodology and validation , 2010 .

[11]  Frédéric Frappart,et al.  Application of the Regional Water Mass Variations from GRACE Satellite Gravimetry to Large-Scale Water Management in Africa , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[12]  Frank Flechtner,et al.  Contributions of GRACE to understanding climate change , 2019, Nature Climate Change.

[13]  Nico Sneeuw,et al.  A Data‐Driven Approach for Repairing the Hydrological Catchment Signal Damage Due to Filtering of GRACE Products , 2017 .

[14]  R. Reedy,et al.  Global models underestimate large decadal declining and rising water storage trends relative to GRACE satellite data , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Hubert H. G. Savenije,et al.  The bias in GRACE estimates of continental water storage variations , 2006 .

[16]  Srinivas Bettadpur,et al.  Reducing errors in the GRACE gravity solutions using regularization , 2012, Journal of Geodesy.

[17]  B. D. Loomis,et al.  Regularization and error characterization of GRACE mascons , 2019, Journal of Geodesy.

[18]  C. Shum,et al.  Improved estimation of terrestrial water storage changes from GRACE , 2005 .

[19]  M. Watkins,et al.  Improved methods for observing Earth's time variable mass distribution with GRACE using spherical cap mascons , 2015 .

[20]  Jianli Chen,et al.  Satellite gravimetry and mass transport in the earth system , 2019, Geodesy and Geodynamics.

[21]  W. Bosch,et al.  EOT11A - Empirical Ocean Tide Model from Multi-Mission Satellite Altimetry , 2008 .

[22]  Jeffrey P. Walker,et al.  THE GLOBAL LAND DATA ASSIMILATION SYSTEM , 2004 .

[23]  Srinivas Bettadpur,et al.  High‐resolution CSR GRACE RL05 mascons , 2016 .

[24]  B. D. Tapley,et al.  Long‐term and seasonal Caspian Sea level change from satellite gravity and altimeter measurements , 2017 .

[25]  S. Swenson,et al.  Post‐processing removal of correlated errors in GRACE data , 2006 .

[26]  F. Frappart,et al.  Constrained Regional Recovery of Continental Water Mass Time-variations from GRACE-based Geopotential Anomalies over South America , 2010, Surveys in Geophysics.

[27]  Christopher Jekeli,et al.  On the energy integral formulation of gravitational potential differences from satellite-to-satellite tracking , 2015 .

[28]  C. Shum,et al.  GRACE time-variable gravity field recovery using an improved energy balance approach , 2015 .

[29]  Tianyi Chen,et al.  Mass Flux Solution in the Tibetan Plateau Using Mascon Modeling , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[30]  Nico Sneeuw,et al.  What Is the Spatial Resolution of grace Satellite Products for Hydrology? , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[31]  S. Swenson,et al.  Accuracy of GRACE mass estimates , 2006 .

[32]  R. Ray,et al.  Barometric Tides from ECMWF Operational Analyses , 2003 .

[33]  Scott B. Luthcke,et al.  Improving global mass flux solutions from Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) through forward modeling and continuous time correlation , 2010 .

[34]  Steven M. Klosko,et al.  Global Mass Flux Solutions from GRACE: A Comparison of Parameter Estimation Strategies - Mass Concentrations Versus Stokes Coefficients , 2010 .

[35]  Roland Klees,et al.  Statistically optimal estimation of Greenland Ice Sheet mass variations from GRACE monthly solutions using an improved mascon approach , 2017, Journal of Geodesy.

[36]  J. Camp,et al.  Antarctica, Greenland and Gulf of Alaska land-ice evolution from an iterated GRACE global mascon solution , 2013, Journal of Glaciology.

[37]  C. Jekeli.  The determination of gravitational potential differences from satellite-to-satellite tracking , 1999 .

[38]  F. Landerer,et al.  Accuracy of scaled GRACE terrestrial water storage estimates , 2012 .

[39]  A. Güntner,et al.  Calibration of a Global Hydrological Model with GRACE Data , 2010 .

[40]  S. Gratton,et al.  GRACE-derived surface water mass anomalies by energy integral approach: application to continental hydrology , 2011 .

[41]  J. Zeng,et al.  Comparison of soil moisture in GLDAS model simulations and in situ observations over the Tibetan Plateau , 2016 .

[42]  Donald F. Argus,et al.  Comment on the paper by Purcell et al (2016) entitled “An Assessment of the ICE-6G_C (VM5a) glacial isostatic adjustment model”: The ICE-6G_C (VM5a) GIA model , 2017 .

[43]  Zizhan Zhang,et al.  Reducing leakage error in GRACE-observed long-term ice mass change: a case study in West Antarctica , 2015, Journal of Geodesy.

[44]  Nico Sneeuw,et al.  On the Spatial Resolution of Homogeneous Isotropic Filters on the Sphere , 2015 .

[45]  Jeongrae Kim,et al.  Simulation study of a low-low satellite-to-satellite tracking mission , 2000 .

[46]  B. Scanlon,et al.  Global analysis of approaches for deriving total water storage changes from GRACE satellites , 2015 .

[47]  Hubert H. G. Savenije,et al.  The design of an optimal filter for monthly GRACE gravity models , 2008 .

[48]  B. Scanlon,et al.  Global evaluation of new GRACE mascon products for hydrologic applications , 2016 .

[49]  Lei Wang,et al.  Regional surface mass anomalies from GRACE KBR measurements: Application of L‐curve regularization anda priori hydrological knowledge , 2012 .

[50]  M. Watkins,et al.  GRACE Measurements of Mass Variability in the Earth System , 2004, Science.

[51]  K. Moffett,et al.  Remote Sens , 2015 .

[52]  Nico Sneeuw,et al.  Minimizing the effects of filtering on catchment scale GRACE solutions , 2016 .

[53]  C. K. Shum,et al.  High-resolution continental water storage recovery from low low satellite-to-satellite tracking , 2005 .

[54]  Shailen D. Desai,et al.  Observing the pole tide with satellite altimetry , 2002 .

[55]  Christopher Jekeli,et al.  Precise estimation of in situ geopotential differences from GRACE low‐low satellite‐to‐satellite tracking and accelerometer data , 2006 .

[56]  Donald F. Argus,et al.  Comment on “An Assessment of the ICE‐6G_C (VM5a) Glacial Isostatic Adjustment Model” by Purcell et al. , 2018 .

[57]  Grzegorz Michalak,et al.  The GFZ GRACE RL06 Monthly Gravity Field Time Series: Processing Details and Quality Assessment , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[58]  Pavel Ditmar,et al.  Understanding data noise in gravity field recovery on the basis of inter-satellite ranging measurements acquired by the satellite gravimetry mission GRACE , 2012, Journal of Geodesy.

[59]  R. Rietbroek,et al.  Key Points: @bullet Consistent Method for Estimating Mass Balances from Grace @bullet Mascon Technique @bullet Evaluate Systematic Errors Gia Correction a Mascon Approach to Assess Ice Sheet and Glacier Mass Balances and Their Uncertainties from Grace Data , 2022 .