A "mental models" approach to the communication of subsurface hydrology and hazards

Abstract. Communicating information about geological and hydrological hazards relies on appropriately worded communications targeted at the needs of the audience. But what are these needs, and how does the geoscientist discern them? This paper adopts a psychological "mental models" approach to assess the public perception of the geological subsurface, presenting the results of attitudinal studies and surveys in three communities in the south-west of England. The findings reveal important preconceptions and misconceptions regarding the impact of hydrological systems and hazards on the geological subsurface, notably in terms of the persistent conceptualisation of underground rivers and the inferred relations between flooding and human activity. The study demonstrates how such mental models can provide geoscientists with empirical, detailed and generalised data of perceptions surrounding an issue, as well reveal unexpected outliers in perception that they may not have considered relevant, but which nevertheless may locally influence communication. Using this approach, geoscientists can develop information messages that more directly engage local concerns and create open engagement pathways based on dialogue, which in turn allow both geoscience "experts" and local "non-experts" to come together and understand each other more effectively.

[1]  Wil Dijkstra,et al.  A model of cognitive processes and conversational principles in survey interview interaction , 2007 .

[2]  M. Callon.  The Role of Lay People in the Production and Dissemination of Scientific Knowledge , 1999 .

[3]  N. Allum,et al.  Science in Society: Re-Evaluating the Deficit Model of Public Attitudes , 2004 .

[4]  S. Lane,et al.  Doing flood risk science differently: an experiment in radical scientific method , 2011 .

[5]  David E. Over,et al.  New paradigm psychology of reasoning , 2009 .

[6]  Paul Slovic,et al.  The affect heuristic , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  David J Ball,et al.  The Feeling of Risk: New Perspectives on Risk Perception , 2010 .

[8]  Jean-Christophe Gaillard,et al.  Experimental use of participatory 3-dimensional models in island community-based disaster risk management , 2009 .

[9]  A. Leiserowitz.  Climate Change Risk Perception and Policy Preferences: The Role of Affect, Imagery, and Values , 2006 .

[10]  Mark T. Keane,et al.  Cognitive psychology: A student's handbook, 7th ed. , 2015 .

[11]  Jonathan Evans,et al.  Logic and human reasoning: an assessment of the deduction paradigm. , 2002, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  Howard Kunreuther,et al.  Science, Values, and Risk , 1996 .

[13]  Jean-Christophe Gaillard,et al.  Integrating knowledge and actions in disaster risk reduction: the contribution of participatory mapping , 2012 .

[14]  Carly McLachlan,et al.  The public perception of carbon dioxide capture and storage in the UK: results from focus groups and a survey , 2004 .

[15]  George R. Long,et al.  Periodic Properties and Inquiry: Student Mental Models Observed during a Periodic Table Puzzle Activity. , 2012 .

[16]  Klaus Wagner,et al.  Mental Models of Flash Floods and Landslides , 2007, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[17]  R. Frodeman.  Geological reasoning: Geology as an interpretive and historical science , 1995 .

[18]  M. Forrester.  Doing Qualitative Research in Psychology: A Practical Guide , 2019, Psychology Teaching Review.

[19]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework , 1988 .

[20]  M. Culshaw,et al.  Communicating the risks arising from geohazards , 2003 .

[21]  B. Johnson.  Risk Communication: A Mental Models Approach , 2002 .

[22]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Impact of knowledge and misconceptions on benefit and risk perception of CCS. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[23]  Katherine Donovan,et al.  Doing social volcanology: exploring volcanic culture in Indonesia , 2010 .

[24]  Tom Mitchell,et al.  Framing volcanic risk communication within disaster risk reduction: finding ways for the social and physical sciences to work together , 2008 .

[25]  B Fischhoff,et al.  Risk perception and communication unplugged: twenty years of process. , 1995, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[26]  A Skarlatidou,et al.  What Do Lay People Want to Know About the Disposal of Nuclear Waste? A Mental Model Approach to the Design and Development of an Online Risk Communication , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[27]  M. Siegrist,et al.  The Role of the Affect and Availability Heuristics in Risk Communication , 2006, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[28]  Katherine Donovan,et al.  Mapping cultural vulnerability in volcanic regions: The practical application of social volcanology at Mt Merapi, Indonesia , 2012 .

[29]  N. Pidgeon,et al.  Mental models of sea-level change: A mixed methods analysis on the Severn Estuary, UK , 2015 .

[30]  Philip N. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Mental Models in Cognitive Science , 1980, Cogn. Sci..

[31]  Nancy M. Cooke,et al.  A formal methodology for acquiring and representing expert knowledge , 1986, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[32]  Mark T. Keane,et al.  Cognitive Psychology: A Student's Handbook , 1990 .

[33]  L B Lave,et al.  Public perception of the risks of floods: implications for communication. , 1991, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[34]  M. Bucchi.  Of deficits, deviations and dialogues: Theories of public communication of science , 2008 .

[35]  P. Kearey,et al.  The new Penguin dictionary of geology , 1996 .

[36]  Matthew C. Nisbet,et al.  Communicating Climate Change: Why Frames Matter for Public Engagement , 2009 .

[37]  P. Slovic.  Perception of risk. , 1987, Science.

[38]  T. Ishikawa,et al.  Spatial thinking in the geosciences and cognitive sciences: A cross-disciplinary look at the intersection of the two fields , 2006 .

[39]  L. Frewer.  The public and effective risk communication. , 2003, Toxicology letters.

[40]  B. Wynne.  Knowledges in Context , 1991 .

[41]  Melissa L. Finucane,et al.  Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk, and Rationality , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[42]  Simon Shackley,et al.  Perceptions of sub-seabed carbon dioxide storage in Scotland and implications for policy: A qualitative study , 2014 .

[43]  Anita Potton,et al.  Mental models and other misconceptions in children's understanding of the earth. , 2009, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[44]  David Liverman,et al.  Communicating Geological Hazards: Educating, Training and Assisting Geoscientists in Communication Skills , 2009 .

[45]  Vinod Goel,et al.  Anatomy of deductive reasoning , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[46]  Carly McLachlan,et al.  The public perception of carbon dioxide capture and storage in the UK: results from focus groups and a survey , 2004 .

[47]  Kim A. Kastens,et al.  Research in Science Education: The Role of Gestures in Geoscience Teaching and Learning , 2008 .

[48]  W. Brewer,et al.  Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[49]  Mark S. Johnson.  Public Participation and Perceptions of Watershed Modeling , 2008 .

[50]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment , 2002 .

[51]  T. Seager,et al.  Application of Multicriteria Decision Analysis in Environmental Decision Making , 2005, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[52]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness , 1985 .

[53]  P. Johnson-Laird.  Mental models and cognitive change , 2013 .

[54]  Lauren A. Mayer,et al.  The 'Mental Models' Methodology for Developing Communications , 2014 .