Dissociable Processes for Learning the Surface Structure and Abstract Structure of Sensorimotor Sequences

A sensorimotor sequence may contain information structure at several different levels. In this study, we investigated the hypothesis that two dissociable processes are required for the learning of surface structure and abstract structure, respectively, of sensorimotor sequences. Surface structure is the simple serial order of the sequence elements, whereas abstract structure is defined by relationships between repeating sequence elements. Thus, sequences ABCBAC and DEFEDF have different surface structures but share a common abstract structure, 123213, and are therefore isomorphic. Our simulations of sequence learning performance in serial reaction time (SRT) tasks demonstrated that (1) an existing model of the primate fronto-striatal system is capable of learning surface structure but fails to learn abstract structure, which requires an additional capability, (2) surface and abstract structure can be learned independently by these independent processes, and (3) only abstract structure transfers to isomorphic sequences. We tested these predictions in human subjects. For a sequence with predictable surface and abstract structure, subjects in either explicit or implicit conditions learn the surface structure, but only explicit subjects learn and transfer the abstract structure. For sequences with only abstract structure, learning and transfer of this structure occurs only in the explicit group. These results are parallel to those from the simulations and support our dissociable process hypothesis. Based on the synthesis of the current simulation and empirical results with our previous neuropsychological findings, we propose a neuro-physiological basis for these dissociable processes: Surface structure can be learned by processes that operate under implicit conditions and rely on the fronto-striatal system, whereas learning abstract structure requires a more explicit activation of dissociable processes that rely on a distributed network that includes the left anterior cortex.

[1]  Peter Ford Dominey From double-step and colliding saccades to pointing in abstract space: Toward a basis for analogical transfer , 1997 .

[2]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Schema induction and analogical transfer , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  Tim Curran,et al.  Attentional and Nonattentional Forms of Sequence Learning , 1993 .

[4]  Laura R. Novick,et al.  Component processes in analogical transfer: Mapping, pattern completion, and adaptation. , 1994 .

[5]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Attentional modulation of visual motion processing in cortical areas MT and MST , 1996, Nature.

[6]  D. Shanks,et al.  Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[7]  Peter Ford Dominey,et al.  A shared system for learning serial and temporal structure of sensori-motor sequences? Evidence from simulation and human experiments. , 1998, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[8]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Finding Structure in Time , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[9]  A. Turing On Computable Numbers, with an Application to the Entscheidungsproblem. , 1937 .

[10]  Roger W. Schvaneveldt,et al.  What Is Learned From Artificial Grammars? Transfer Tests of Simple Association , 1994 .

[11]  Y. Kawasaki,et al.  Left Hypofrontality Correlates with Blunted Affect in Schizophrenia , 1992, The Japanese journal of psychiatry and neurology.

[12]  John R. Vokey,et al.  Abstract analogies and abstracted grammars: Comments on Reber and Mathews et al. , 1991 .

[13]  Peter Ford Dominey,et al.  Schizophrenics learn surface but not abstract structure in a serial reaction time task , 1997, Neuroreport.

[14]  Peter Ford Dominey,et al.  Influences of temporal organization on sequence learning and transfer : Comments on Stadler (1995) and Curran and Keele (1993) , 1998 .

[15]  J E Lisman,et al.  Storage of 7 +/- 2 short-term memories in oscillatory subcycles , 1995, Science.

[16]  M. Nissen,et al.  Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  Michael A. Stadler,et al.  Statistical structure and implicit serial learning. , 1992 .

[18]  Peter Ford Dominey,et al.  Contribution of frontostriatal function to sequence learning in Parkinson's Disease: evidence for dissociable systems , 1997, Neuroreport.

[19]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Functional Mapping of Sequence Learning in Normal Humans , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  R. Mathews,et al.  Role of Implicit and Explicit Processes in Learning From Examples: A Synergistic Effect , 1989 .

[21]  Peter Ford Dominey An Anatomically Structured Sensory-Motor Sequence Learning System Displays Some General Linguistic Capacities , 1997, Brain and Language.

[22]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Learning the structure of event sequences. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[23]  Peter Ford Dominey,et al.  Analogical transfer is effective in a serial reaction time task in Parkinson's disease: Evidence for a dissociable form of sequence learning , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  Peter Ford Dominey,et al.  Analogical Transfer in Sequence Learning. , 1995, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[25]  L. Squire,et al.  Artificial grammar learning depends on implicit acquisition of both abstract and exemplar-specific information. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[26]  John R. Vokey,et al.  Abstract analogies and abstracted grammars: Comments on Reber (1989) and Mathews et al. (1989). , 1991 .

[27]  N. Chater,et al.  Transfer in artificial grammar learning : A reevaluation , 1996 .

[28]  Peter Ford Dominey Reducing problem complexity by analogical transfer , 1997 .

[29]  L. Squire,et al.  The learning of categories: parallel brain systems for item memory and category knowledge. , 1993, Science.

[30]  Peter Ford Dominey,et al.  Neural network processing of natural language: I. Sensitivity to serial, temporal and abstract structure of language in the infant , 2000 .

[31]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  On Certain Formal Properties of Grammars , 1959, Inf. Control..

[32]  P. Greenfield,et al.  Language, tools and brain: The ontogeny and phylogeny of hierarchically organized sequential behavior , 1991, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[33]  R. Gómez,et al.  Transfer and Complexity in Artificial Grammar Learning , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[34]  L. A. Portnoff Schizophrenia and semantic aphasia: a clinical comparison. , 1982, The International journal of neuroscience.

[35]  Paul Thagard,et al.  Analogical Mapping by Constraint Satisfaction , 1989, Cogn. Sci..

[36]  M. Hallett,et al.  Procedural learning in Parkinson's disease and cerebellar degeneration , 1993, Annals of neurology.

[37]  Peter Ford Dominey,et al.  Encoding behavioral context in recurrent networks of the fronto-striatal system: a simulation study. , 1997, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[38]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Overcoming contextual limitations on problem-solving transfer. , 1989 .

[39]  Peter Ford Dominey,et al.  A Model of Corticostriatal Plasticity for Learning Oculomotor Associations and Sequences , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[40]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Development of analogical problem-solving skill. , 1984, Child development.

[41]  L. R. Novick Analogical transfer, problem similarity, and expertise. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[42]  L R Squire,et al.  The information acquired during artificial grammar learning. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[43]  J. Leo van Hemmen,et al.  Temporal association , 1991 .