Evaluation of polyphosphoric acid-modified binders using multiple stress creep and recovery and linear amplitude sweep tests

This paper assesses rutting and fatigue behaviours of polyphosphoric acid (PPA)-modified binders using the advanced tests of multiple stress creep and recovery (MSCR) and linear amplitude sweep (LAS). The PG 58-22 binder was selected as the unmodified binder and the PPA contents ranged from 0.5% to 1.5% with 0.5% increment being added to it. The MSCR test was applied at 40°C, 55°C, 70°C and the performance grade (PG) temperatures of the binders to consider a wide range of high temperatures. To further explore the role of high stress level on the creep and recovery behaviour, the stress of 12.8 kPa was selected to be added to the MSCR standard procedure. Moreover, the LAS test was conducted at the intermediate temperature of 25°C to evaluate the fatigue resistance of the PPA binders. MSCR tests indicate that, for all the selected temperatures and stresses, increasing the PPA content causes the non-recoverable compliance (Jnr) and the percent recovery (R) values to be improved. Despite the positive effects, modification of the PG 58-22 base binder with the PPA additives does not ensure an acceptable rutting performance at the field temperatures equal to or higher than the PGs, because of the high Jnr values compared to the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) MP 19-10 limits and also the negative R values of the PPA binders at these circumstances. On the other hand, LAS tests indicate better resistances of the PPA binders to fatigue than that of the PG 58-22 unmodified one. As the PPA content increases, the fatigue performance significantly increases.

[1]  Yusuf Mehta,et al.  Correlation between Multiple Stress Creep Recovery (MSCR) Results and Polymer Modification of Binder , 2014 .

[2]  Fujie Zhou,et al.  Evaluation of Fatigue Tests for Characterizing Asphalt Binders , 2013 .

[3]  John D'Angelo,et al.  Effect of Polyphosphoric Acid on Asphalt Binder Properties , 2010 .

[4]  Hussain U Bahia,et al.  Part 1: Bituminous Materials: Nonlinearity of Repeated Creep and Recovery Binder Test and Relationship with Mixture Permanent Deformation , 2006 .

[5]  J. Youtcheff,et al.  Use of Phosphoric Acid as a Modifier for Hot-Mix Asphalt , 2009 .

[6]  G. Orange,et al.  CHEMICAL MODIFICATION OF BITUMEN THROUGH POLYPHOSPHORIC ACID: PROPERTIES-MICRO-STRUCTURE RELATIONSHIP , 2004 .

[7]  M. D. I. Domingos,et al.  Susceptibility of Asphalt Binders to Rutting: Literature Review , 2016 .

[8]  R. Kluttz,et al.  Revision of the Superpave High Temperature Binder Specification: The Multiple Stress Creep Recovery Test (With Discussion) , 2007 .

[9]  John D'Angelo,et al.  Proposed Refinement of Superpave High-Temperature Specification Parameter for Performance-Graded Binders , 2001 .

[10]  R M Anderson,et al.  CHARACTERIZATION OF MODIFIED ASPHALT BINDERS IN SUPERPAVE MIX DESIGN , 2001 .

[11]  Ahmed Faheem,et al.  Field Validation of Wisconsin Modified Binder Selection Guidelines - Phase II , 2007 .

[12]  Nader Tabatabaee,et al.  Proposals for modification of Iranian bitumen to meet the climatic requirements of Iran , 2009 .

[13]  J. D'angelo,et al.  Superpave Binder Specifications and their Performance Relationship to Modified Binders , 2002 .

[14]  Hussain U Bahia,et al.  Developing a Surrogate Test for Fatigue of Asphalt Binders , 2008 .

[15]  Pravat Karki,et al.  Use of the MSCR test to characterize the asphalt binder properties relative to HMA rutting performance – A laboratory study , 2015 .

[16]  Richard Schapery Correspondence principles and a generalizedJ integral for large deformation and fracture analysis of viscoelastic media , 1984 .

[17]  Robert L. Lytton,et al.  MICRODAMAGE HEALING IN ASPHALT AND ASPHALT CONCRETE, VOLUME I: MICRODAMAGE AND MICRODAMAGE HEALING, PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT , 2001 .

[18]  John D'Angelo,et al.  Refinement of Superpave High-Temperature Binder Specification Based on Pavement Performance in the Accelerated Loading Facility , 2003 .

[19]  Bor-Wen Tsai,et al.  Influence of Asphalt Binder Properties on the Fatigue Performance of Asphalt Concrete Pavements (With Discussion) , 2005 .

[20]  R. Miró,et al.  Application of a strain sweep test to assess fatigue behavior of asphalt binders , 2012 .

[21]  Zhijun Li,et al.  Effect of Oxidative Aging on Binder Fatigue Performance , 2011 .

[22]  Gaylon L. Baumgardner,et al.  Rutting and Moisture Resistance of Asphalt Mixtures Containing Polymer and Polyphosphoric Acid Modified Bitumen , 2004 .

[23]  Hussain U Bahia,et al.  Why do we Need to Change G*/Sinδ and How? , 2006 .

[24]  T. W. Kennedy,et al.  Development of SHRP binder specification , 1993 .

[25]  Carl M. Johnson ESTIMATING ASPHALT BINDER FATIGUE RESISTANCE USING AN ACCELERATED TEST METHOD , 2010 .

[26]  Robert B McGennis Implementation of Polyphosphoric Acid Modification of Asphalt Binders and Related Experience: Case Study , 2012 .

[27]  Aroon Shenoy,et al.  New Criterion for Superpave High-Temperature Binder Specification , 2004 .

[28]  Thamindra Lakshan Jayanthi Wasage,et al.  Rheological analysis of multi-stress creep recovery (MSCR) test , 2011 .

[29]  John D'Angelo,et al.  Practical Use of Multiple Stress Creep and Recovery Test , 2009 .

[30]  Raj Dongré,et al.  Evaluation of Repeated Creep and Recovery Test Method as an Alternative to SHRP+ Requirements for Polymer Modified Asphalt Binders , 2006 .

[31]  Hussain U Bahia,et al.  Practical Application of Viscoelastic Continuum Damage Theory to Asphalt Binder Fatigue Characterization , 2009 .

[32]  Y. Richard Kim,et al.  Unified failure criterion for asphalt binder under cyclic fatigue loading , 2015 .

[33]  Hussain U Bahia,et al.  Modification and Validation of Linear Amplitude Sweep Test for Binder Fatigue Specification , 2011 .

[34]  S. Dreessen,et al.  A new performance related test method for rutting prediction: MSCRT , 2009 .

[35]  Praveen Kumar,et al.  A study on creep and recovery behavior of asphalt binders , 2015 .

[36]  Terhi Pellinen,et al.  Creep-recovery behavior of bituminous binders and its relation to asphalt mixture rutting , 2015 .

[37]  Cassie Hintz,et al.  Understanding Mechanisms Leading to Asphalt Binder Fatigue , 2012 .

[38]  Amir Golalipour,et al.  Modification of Multiple Stress Creep and Recovery Test Procedure and Usage in Specification , 2011 .

[39]  John D'Angelo,et al.  Current Status of Superpave Binder Specification , 2009 .

[40]  John D'Angelo,et al.  The Relationship of the MSCR Test to Rutting , 2009 .

[41]  Y. Richard Kim,et al.  Improved calculation method of damage parameter in viscoelastic continuum damage model , 2010 .

[42]  K Close,et al.  AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS COMPUTER SYSTEMS INDEX , 1976 .

[43]  Abbas Babazadeh,et al.  Effects of Stress Levels on Creep and Recovery Behavior of Modified Asphalt Binders with the Same Continuous Performance Grades , 2015 .

[44]  Hussain U Bahia,et al.  Measuring and Defining Fatigue Behavior of Asphalt Binders , 2002 .

[45]  Y. Richard Kim,et al.  Implications of warm-mix asphalt on long-term oxidative ageing and fatigue performance of asphalt binders and mixtures , 2014 .

[46]  David A. Anderson,et al.  Zero Shear Viscosity of Asphalt Binders , 2002 .

[47]  Darrell C. Fee,et al.  Polyphosphoric Acid Modification of Asphalt , 2010 .

[48]  John D'Angelo,et al.  Creep and Recovery , 2007 .