Multiple Atlas Construction From A Heterogeneous Brain MR Image Collection

In this paper, we propose a novel framework for computing single or multiple atlases (templates) from a large population of images. Unlike many existing methods, our proposed approach is distinguished by its emphasis on the sharpness of the computed atlases and the requirement of rotational invariance. In particular, we argue that sharp atlas images that retain crucial and important anatomical features with high fidelity are more useful for many medical imaging applications when compared with the blurry and fuzzy atlas images computed by most existing methods. The geometric notion that underlies our approach is the idea of manifold learning in a quotient space, the quotient space of the image space by the rotations. We present an extension of the existing manifold learning approach to quotient spaces by using invariant metrics, and utilizing the manifold structure for partitioning the images into more homogeneous sub-collections, each of which can be represented by a single atlas image. Specifically, we propose a three-step algorithm. First, we partition the input images into subgroups using unsupervised or semi-supervised learning methods on manifolds. Then we formulate a convex optimization problem in each subgroup to locate the atlases and determine the crucial neighbors that are used in the realization step to form the template images. We have evaluated our algorithm using whole brain MR volumes from OASIS database. Experimental results demonstrate that the atlases computed using the proposed algorithm not only discover the brain structural changes in different age groups but also preserve important structural details and generally enjoy better image quality.

[1]  Anuj Srivastava,et al.  Parameterization-Invariant Shape Comparisons of Anatomical Surfaces , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  Mert R. Sabuncu,et al.  Image-driven population analysis through mixture modeling , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[3]  Andrew B. Kahng,et al.  New spectral methods for ratio cut partitioning and clustering , 1991, IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst..

[4]  P. Newstead Moduli Spaces and Vector Bundles: Geometric Invariant Theory , 2009 .

[5]  Mikhail Belkin,et al.  Using manifold structure for partially labelled classification , 2002, NIPS 2002.

[6]  Baba C. Vemuri,et al.  Image atlas construction via intrinsic averaging on the manifold of images , 2010, 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[7]  Michael Weiner,et al.  Tensor-based morphometry as a neuroimaging biomarker for Alzheimer's disease: An MRI study of 676 AD, MCI, and normal subjects , 2008, NeuroImage.

[8]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Convex Optimization , 2004, Algorithms and Theory of Computation Handbook.

[9]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Effects of Healthy Aging Measured By Intracranial Compartment Volumes Using a Designed MR Brain Database , 2005, MICCAI.

[10]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Normalized cuts and image segmentation , 1997, Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[11]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  GRAM: A framework for geodesic registration on anatomical manifolds , 2010, Medical Image Anal..

[12]  Arno Klein,et al.  A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration , 2011, NeuroImage.

[13]  Mikhail Belkin,et al.  Semi-Supervised Learning on Riemannian Manifolds , 2004, Machine Learning.

[14]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  Group Actions, Homeomorphisms, and Matching: A General Framework , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[15]  P. Thomas Fletcher,et al.  Population Shape Regression from Random Design Data , 2007, 2007 IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision.

[16]  Mert R. Sabuncu,et al.  Effects of Registration Regularization and Atlas Sharpness on Segmentation Accuracy , 2007, MICCAI.

[17]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. , 2000, Science.

[18]  Vladimir Vapnik,et al.  Statistical learning theory , 1998 .

[19]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Unbiased diffeomorphic atlas construction for computational anatomy , 2004, NeuroImage.

[20]  Suresh Venkatasubramanian,et al.  Robust statistics on Riemannian manifolds via the geometric median , 2008, 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[21]  Mikhail Belkin,et al.  Laplacian Eigenmaps and Spectral Techniques for Embedding and Clustering , 2001, NIPS.

[22]  John G. Csernansky,et al.  Open Access Series of Imaging Studies (OASIS): Cross-sectional MRI Data in Young, Middle Aged, Nondemented, and Demented Older Adults , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  H. Karcher Riemannian center of mass and mollifier smoothing , 1977 .

[24]  Y. Chen,et al.  Image registration via level-set motion: Applications to atlas-based segmentation , 2003, Medical Image Anal..

[25]  A. Dale,et al.  Whole Brain Segmentation Automated Labeling of Neuroanatomical Structures in the Human Brain , 2002, Neuron.

[26]  Xin-She Yang,et al.  Introduction to Algorithms , 2021, Nature-Inspired Optimization Algorithms.

[27]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  ABSORB: Atlas building by self-organized registration and bundling , 2010, NeuroImage.

[28]  Pierre-Louis Bazin,et al.  Statistical and Topological Atlas Based Brain Image Segmentation , 2007, MICCAI.

[29]  Mert R. Sabuncu,et al.  Discovering Modes of an Image Population through Mixture Modeling , 2008, MICCAI.

[31]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Identifying global anatomical differences: Deformation‐based morphometry , 1998 .

[32]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  SharpMean: Groupwise registration guided by sharp mean image and tree-based registration , 2011, NeuroImage.

[33]  R. K. Shyamasundar,et al.  Introduction to algorithms , 1996 .

[34]  Xiaojin Zhu,et al.  --1 CONTENTS , 2006 .

[35]  Ross T. Whitaker,et al.  Manifold modeling for brain population analysis , 2010, Medical Image Anal..