Improving the readability and processability of a pediatric informed consent document: effects on parents' understanding.

OBJECTIVE To examine whether a consent document modified to conform with the federal guidelines for readability and processability would result in greater parental understanding compared with a standard form. DESIGN Randomized clinical study. SETTING The preoperative waiting area of a larger tertiary care children's hospital. PARTICIPANTS A total of 305 parents of children scheduled for minor elective surgical procedures. INTERVENTIONS Parents were randomized to receive information about a clinical study in 1 of 4 ways: (1) standard consent form alone, (2) standard consent form with verbal disclosure, (3) modified form alone (standard form modified to meet the federal guidelines for readability and processability), and (4) modified form with verbal disclosure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Parents were interviewed to determine their understanding of 11 elements of consent, including study purpose, protocol, risks, benefits to child (direct), benefit to others (indirect), freedom to withdraw, alternatives, duration of study, voluntariness, confidentiality, and whom to contact. Their responses were scored by 2 independent assessors. RESULTS Understanding of the protocol, study duration, risks, and direct benefits, together with overall understanding, was greater among parents who received the modified form (P<.001). Additionally, parents reported that the modified form had greater clarity (P = .009) and improved layout compared with the standard form (P<.001). When parents were shown both forms, 81.2% preferred the modified version. CONCLUSIONS Results suggest that a consent form written according to federal guidelines for readability and processability can improve parent understanding and thus will be important in enhancing the informed consent process.

[1]  Alan R. Tait,et al.  Do They Understand? (Part II): Assent of Children Participating in Clinical Anesthesia and Surgery Research , 2003, Anesthesiology.

[2]  Terri Voepel-Lewis,et al.  Do They Understand? (Part I): Parental Consent for Children Participating in Clinical Anesthesia and Surgery Research , 2003, Anesthesiology.

[3]  M. Speece,et al.  Readability of Pediatric Patient Education Materials , 1995, Clinical pediatrics.

[4]  E. Winslow.  Patient education materials. , 2001, The American journal of nursing.

[5]  T M Grundner,et al.  On the readability of surgical consent forms. , 1980, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  T. Habermann,et al.  Randomized, controlled trial of an easy-to-read informed consent statement for clinical trial participation: a study of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  Michael D. Robinson,et al.  Simulation, Scenarios, and Emotional Appraisal: Testing the Convergence of Real and Imagined Reactions to Emotional Stimuli , 2001 .

[8]  R. M. Cooper,et al.  Readability of informed consent forms. , 1991, American journal of hospital pharmacy.

[9]  How informed is consent? Use of an information booklet in patients undergoing total hip replacement. , 2001, Irish medical journal.

[10]  Terri Voepel-Lewis,et al.  Participation of Children in Clinical Research: Factors that Influence a Parent's Decision to Consent , 2003, Anesthesiology.

[11]  J. Feussner,et al.  A randomized controlled trial comparing quantitative informed consent formats. , 1991, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[12]  E. Kodish.  Informed consent for pediatric research: is it really possible? , 2003, The Journal of pediatrics.

[13]  E. J. Mayeaux,et al.  Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: a shortened screening instrument. , 1993, Family medicine.

[14]  T. Voepel-Lewis,et al.  Factors that influence parents' assessments of the risks and benefits of research involving their children. , 2004, Pediatrics.

[15]  H. Llewellyn-Thomas,et al.  Presenting clinical trial information: a comparison of methods. , 1995, Patient education and counseling.

[16]  P. A. Kelly,et al.  Readability of pediatric biomedical research informed consent forms. , 1990, Pediatrics.

[17]  Robert J. Levine,et al.  Ethics and Regulation Of Clinical Research , 1982 .

[18]  A. Patenaude,et al.  Clinical Trials in Pediatric Cancer: Parental Perspectives on Informed Consent , 2003, Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology.

[19]  S. J. Philipson,et al.  Effectiveness of a writing improvement intervention program on the readability of the research informed consent document. , 1999, Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research.

[20]  M. Hochhauser.  The Informed Consent Form: Document Development and Evaluation , 2000 .

[21]  S. Gabram,et al.  Informed consent for research: a study to evaluate readability and processability to effect change. , 1995, Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research.

[22]  W P McKinney,et al.  Educating patients with limited literacy skills: the effectiveness of printed and videotaped materials about colon cancer. , 1994, American journal of public health.

[23]  S Shiffman,et al.  Responses to hypothetical high risk situations: do they predict weight loss in a behavioral treatment program or the context of dietary lapses? , 1995, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[24]  B. Weiss,et al.  The Relationship Between Literacy and Health , 1991, Journal of health care for the poor and underserved.

[25]  Daniel L. McGee,et al.  Health Status Of Illiterate Adults: Relation Between Literacy And Health Status Among Persons With Low Literacy Skills , 1992, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.

[26]  Improvement,et al.  Adult literacy in America : a first look at the results of the National Adult Literacy Survey , 1993 .

[27]  F. E. Freeberg,et al.  Informed consent documents: increasing comprehension by reducing reading level. , 1990, IRB.

[28]  H. Egeth,et al.  Using pictographs to enhance recall of spoken medical instructions II. , 1998, Patient education and counseling.

[29]  M. D. Dunnette,et al.  An alternative selection procedure: The low-fidelity simulation. , 1990 .

[30]  Victor H. Vroom,et al.  Predicting Leader behavior from a Measure of behavioral Intent , 1978 .

[31]  A. Dennison,et al.  Who's afraid of informed consent? , 1993, BMJ.

[32]  Barry D. Weiss,et al.  Communicating with patients who have limited literacy skills. Report of the National Work Group on Literacy and Health. , 1998, The Journal of family practice.

[33]  C. F. Kao,et al.  The efficient assessment of need for cognition. , 1984, Journal of personality assessment.