A closer look at the relationship of cognitive and metacognitive strategy use to EFL reading achievement test performance

This article reports on an investigation into the relationship of test-takers’ use of cognitive and metacognitive strategies to the EFL (English as a foreign language) reading test performance. The study employed both quantitative and qualitative data analyses. The 384 students enrolled in a fundamental English course at a Thai university took an 85-item, multiple-choice reading comprehension achievement test, followed by a cognitive-metacognitive questionnaire on how they thought while completing the test. Eight of these students (4 highly successful and 4 unsuccessful)were selected for retrospective interviews. The results suggested that (1) the use of cognitive and metacognitive strategies had a positive relationship to the reading test performance; and (2) highly successful test-takers reported significantly higher metacognitive strategy use than the moderately successful ones who in turn reported higher use of these strategies than the unsuccessful test-takers. Discussion of the findings and implications for further research are articulated.

[1]  James E. Purpura Investigating the effects of strategy use and second language test performance with high- and low-ability test takers: a structural equation modelling approach , 1998 .

[2]  Douglas J. Hacker,et al.  Metacognition in educational theory and practice. , 1998 .

[3]  Gregory Schraw Promoting general metacognitive awareness , 1998 .

[4]  Douglas J. Hacker Definitions and Empirical Foundations , 1998 .

[5]  Lyle F. Bachman,et al.  语言测试实践 = Language testing in practice , 1998 .

[6]  Michael Rube Redfield,et al.  Assessing Language Ability in the Classroom , 1998 .

[7]  James E. Purpura An Analysis of the Relationships between Test Takers' Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategy Use and Second Language Test Performance. , 1997 .

[8]  Samuel Messick,et al.  Validity and washback in language testing , 1996 .

[9]  T. McNamara Measuring Second Language Performance , 1996 .

[10]  Julie Kearney,et al.  The Study of Second Language Acquisition.: Rod Ellis , 1995 .

[11]  Gale,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[12]  A. Wenden,et al.  Learner Strategies For Learner Autonomy , 1991 .

[13]  J. Townsend Teaching/learning strategies. , 1990, Nursing times.

[14]  J. Michael O'Malley,et al.  Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition: Subject index , 1990 .

[15]  J. M. O'malley,et al.  Listening Comprehension Strategies in Second Language Acquisition , 1989 .

[16]  R. Oxford “The Best and the Worst”: An Exercise to Tap Perceptions of Language-Learning Experiences and Strategies , 1989 .

[17]  H. Douglas Brown,et al.  A practical guide to language learning: a fifteen-week program of strategies for success / H. Douglas Brown , 1989 .

[18]  Anna Uhl Chamot,et al.  Learning Strategies in Foreign Language Instruction , 1989 .

[19]  H. Simon,et al.  Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1986 .

[20]  Robert L. Politzer,et al.  An Exploratory Study of Learning Behaviors and Their Relationship to Gains in Linguistic and Communicative Competence , 1985 .

[21]  Ann L. Brown Learning, remembering, and understanding , 1982 .

[22]  J. Alderson Assessing Reading: Acknowledgements , 2000 .

[23]  C. Chapelle Construct definition and validity inquiry in SLA research , 1999 .

[24]  Eunsook Hong,et al.  Differential Stability of State and Trait Self-Regulation in Academic Performance , 1998 .

[25]  E. Hong Differential stability of individual differences in state and trait test anxiety , 1998 .

[26]  P. Alexander,et al.  A Perspective on Strategy Research: Progress and Prospects , 1998 .

[27]  R. W. Schmidt DECONSTRUCTING CONSCIOUSNESS IS SEARCH OF USEFUL DEFINITIONS FOR APPLIED LINGUISTICS , 1994 .

[28]  K. Bailey The Research Manual: Design and Statistics for Applied Linguistics , 1991 .

[29]  Gabriele Kasper,et al.  Strategies in interlanguage communication , 1983 .

[30]  Rainer H. Kluwe,et al.  Cognitive Knowledge and Executive Control: Metacognition , 1982 .

[31]  J. Flavell First Discussant’s Comments: What is Memory Development the Development of? , 1971 .