Structural equation modelling of construction bond administration

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine construction bonds, which is a risk management tool for ensuring that projects are delivered successfully, with emphasis on the influence of stakeholders, project characteristics and bonding decision factors. Design/methodology/approach Using case study of completed public building projects, questionnaires were administered on stakeholders that participated in the projects to solicit information on identified issues. Structural equation modelling (SEM) was used to examine relationship among identified factors, and various model selection and validation tests were carried out to arrive at the best-fit model. Findings The final model revealed that type of bond, stakeholders’ influence, project characteristics, risks of bonded projects and bonding decision factors have significant effect on success of bonded construction projects. Of the stakeholders, guarantors and contractors have greater influence on effective administration of bonds. Research limitations/implications The study was limited to Lagos and Ondo states, Nigeria. Data were gathered from clients of public projects, banks and insurance companies (guarantors), as well as contracting, quantity surveying and architectural firms registered with the state governments. This is because of the fact that only such firms can be engaged on projects emanating from the governments. Practical implications To enhance project success, there is a need to adopt construction bond for both public and private projects as against the current practice where it is only mandated for public projects. Originality/value Using SEM, this research examined administration of construction bonds with a view to ascertaining their effects on projects success, thereby providing relevant empirical information for stakeholders for effective administration of construction bond.

[1]  Qian Tian,et al.  Reasons Underlying a Mandatory High Penalty Construction Contract Bonding System , 2004 .

[2]  Financial Administration of Construction Contracts by Owners , 2006 .

[3]  Mehmet Emre Bayraktar,et al.  Warranty Bonds from the Perspective of Surety Companies , 2006 .

[4]  Anil Sawhney,et al.  Structural equation model for assessing impacts of contractor's performance on project success , 2011 .

[5]  Hans Voordijk,et al.  Construction contracting and civil–military interaction , 2010 .

[6]  D. Straub,et al.  Editor's comments: a critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in MIS quarterly , 2012 .

[7]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Selecting a suitable procurement method for a building project , 1998 .

[8]  Thanwadee Chinda,et al.  Structural equation model of construction safety culture , 2008 .

[9]  Sai On Cheung,et al.  Structural Equation Model of Trust and Partnering Success , 2005 .

[10]  Eddy M. Rojas,et al.  Research Validation: Challenges and Opportunities in the Construction Domain , 2010 .

[11]  E. Hui,et al.  Measuring customer satisfaction of FM service in housing sector: A structural equation model approach , 2010 .

[12]  Ola Lædre,et al.  Procurement Routes in Public Building and Construction Projects , 2006 .

[13]  Issaka E. Ndekugri PERFORMANCE BONDS AND GUARANTEES: CONSTRUCTION OWNERS AND PROFESSIONALS BEWARE , 1999 .

[14]  Xianhai Meng,et al.  Guarantees for Contractor’s Performance and Owner’s Payment in China , 2002 .

[15]  Jason Bennett Thatcher,et al.  Advancing operations management theory using exploratory structural equation modelling techniques , 2010 .

[16]  G. Ofori,et al.  Structural equation modelling of organizational justice and cooperative behaviour in the construction project claims process: contractors' perspectives , 2011 .

[17]  David Arditi,et al.  Predicting the risk of contractor default in Saudi Arabia utilizing artificial neural network (ANN) and genetic algorithm (GA) techniques , 2005 .

[18]  Ayodeji Emmanuel Oke,et al.  Establishing a common ground for the use of structural equation modelling for construction related research studies , 2012 .

[19]  Yat Hung Chiang,et al.  Critical Success Factors for Bond Financing of Construction Projects in Asia , 2011 .

[20]  Patrick T.I. Lam,et al.  Application of Delphi method in selection of procurement systems for construction projects , 2001 .

[21]  Ramendra Singh,et al.  Does my structural model represent the real phenomenon?: a review of the appropriate use of Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) model fit indices , 2009 .

[22]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models , 2012 .

[23]  K. Yuan,et al.  Ridge structural equation modelling with correlation matrices for ordinal and continuous data. , 2011, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[24]  Mehmet Emre Bayraktar,et al.  Scoring Approach to Construction Bond Underwriting , 2010 .

[25]  Katerina Gotzamani,et al.  An empirical study of the ISO 9000 standards’ contribution towards total quality management , 2001 .

[26]  Roozbeh Kangari,et al.  CONSTRUCTION SURETY BONDING , 2001 .

[27]  P. Barrett Structural equation modelling : Adjudging model fit , 2007 .

[28]  Mehmet Emre Bayraktar,et al.  Use of Warranties on Highway Projects: A Real Option Perspective , 2004 .

[29]  Edgar C. Merkle,et al.  The problem of model selection uncertainty in structural equation modeling. , 2012, Psychological methods.

[30]  Lin B. Heath Cost engineering applications for performance bond surety defaults , 2004 .

[31]  Simon Washington,et al.  Structural equation model of construction contract dispute potential , 2000 .