Effect of 176Lu intrinsic radioactivity on dual head PET system imaging and data acquisition, simulation, and experimental measurements.

PURPOSE In this work, the authors aim for the estimation of the effect of (176)Lu intrinsic radioactivity on the performance of a dual head PET system dedicated to small animal imaging. METHODS A prototype camera has been used as a reference system in order to validate two GATE simulation models, which were used for the investigation. The first model includes the (176)Lu intrinsic radioactivity, while the second does not. The two models have been designed in order to provide similar sensitivities, in terms of count rate performance and scatter fraction, in the linear range of activities. In addition, the model with the (176)Lu intrinsic radioactivity, has been validated in terms of background count rate. Different acquisition schemes have been examined in order to determine the optimum conditions to minimize the (176)Lu effects, while maintaining a high trues count rate. In addition, the effect on the image quality, in terms of spatial resolution, signal-to-noise ratio, and minimum detectable activity, was investigated. RESULTS Both models are in good agreement with the measured data. While, the presence of the (176)Lu altered the dead time of the model, it also affected the singles, trues, and randoms count rates. The noise equivalent count rate curves of the two models indicate that for low activities, the lack of (176)Lu radioactivity leads to better noise properties due to the underestimation of the randoms. Signal-to-noise ratio measurement on coincidence images confirm the aforementioned claim, since the model without the (176)Lu provides better less noisy images. Furthermore, the spatial resolution and the minimum detectable activity are overestimated. CONCLUSIONS It has been proven that the lack of the (176)Lu intrinsic radioactivity has an impact on the design of the simulation model's dead time. Even if there is an alignment with experimental results still the noise properties, for a wide range of activities, are overestimated. In addition, for low activities, better image quality, is presented, mainly due to the lack of the (176)Lu photons which blur the images. Furthermore, it was shown that the use of a high hardware threshold allows the application of a wide energy window, which improves the statistics without a significant compromise on the quality of the detected photons, mainly, due to the early rejection of the low energy photons and the low scatter factor.

[1]  Qinan Bao,et al.  Estimation of the minimum detectable activity of preclinical PET imaging systems with an analytical method. , 2010, Medical physics.

[2]  Raymond R Raylman,et al.  Positron emission mammography with tomographic acquisition using dual planar detectors: initial evaluations. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  D. Stout,et al.  Validation of a GATE Model of $^{176}$Lu Intrinsic Radioactivity in LSO PET Systems , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[4]  James T Dobbins,et al.  Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  S. Fukuda,et al.  A novel PET scanner with semiconductor detectors may improve diagnostic accuracy in the metastatic survey of head and neck cancer patients , 2012, Annals of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  Qinan Bao,et al.  Investigation of the minimum detectable activity level of a preclinical LSO PET scanner , 2007, 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[7]  George Loudos,et al.  Tomographic evaluation of a dual-head positron emission tomography system , 2011 .

[8]  John L. Humm,et al.  From PET detectors to PET scanners , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[9]  Arion F. Chatziioannou,et al.  Performance Evaluation of PETbox: A Low Cost Bench Top Preclinical PET Scanner , 2010, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[10]  Edward Anashkin,et al.  First test results of a commercially available clinical PET scanner using the NEMA NU 4 - 2008 small animal PET standards , 2008, 2008 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[11]  Bernard Bendriem,et al.  Investigation of noise equivalent count rate in positron imaging using a dual head gamma camera , 1997 .

[12]  Eiji Yoshida,et al.  Performance evaluation of a small OpenPET prototype , 2010, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposuim & Medical Imaging Conference.

[13]  Arion F. Chatziioannou,et al.  Evaluation of the detection limit at low activity levels for three preclinical PET systems , 2010, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposuim & Medical Imaging Conference.

[14]  George Loudos,et al.  Experimental and Simulation Studies for the Optimization of Dedicated Scintimammography Cameras , 2012 .

[15]  M. Senda,et al.  Investigation of single, random, and true counts from natural radioactivity in LSO-based clinical PET , 2005, Annals of nuclear medicine.

[16]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Clinical Imaging Characteristics of the Positron Emission Mammography Camera: PEM Flex Solo II , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  I. Kandarakis,et al.  Small animal positron emission tomography using a dual head prototype based on PSPMTs and FPGA readout , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Workshop on Imaging Systems and Techniques.

[18]  Simone Weber,et al.  Small animal PET: aspects of performance assessment , 2004, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[19]  A. Chatziioannou PET scanners dedicated to molecular imaging of small animal models. , 2002, Molecular imaging and biology : MIB : the official publication of the Academy of Molecular Imaging.

[20]  Martin Gotthardt,et al.  Image-Quality Assessment for Several Positron Emitters Using the NEMA NU 4-2008 Standards in the Siemens Inveon Small-Animal PET Scanner , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[21]  S Stute,et al.  GATE V6: a major enhancement of the GATE simulation platform enabling modelling of CT and radiotherapy , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  G. Santin,et al.  Simulation of time curves in small animal PET using GATE , 2004 .

[23]  T J Spinks,et al.  The design and physical characteristics of a small animal positron emission tomograph. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  George Loudos,et al.  Tomographie and planar evaluation of dual head small animal PET , 2010, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposuim & Medical Imaging Conference.

[25]  Tim Mulnix,et al.  NEMA NU 2 performance tests for scanners with intrinsic radioactivity. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.