A behavioural comparison of route choice on metro networks: Time, transfers, crowding, topology and socio-demographics

Understanding travellers’ behaviour is key element in transportation planning. This article presents a route choice model for metro networks that considers different time components as well as variables related to the transferring experience, train crowding, network topology and socio-demographic characteristics. The route choice model is applied to the London Underground and Santiago Metro networks, to make a comparison of the decision making process of the users on both cities. As all the variables are statistically significant, it is possible to affirm that public transport users take into account a wide variety of elements when choosing routes. While in London the travellers prefer to spend time walking, in Santiago is preferable to spend time waiting. Santiago Metro users are more willing to travel in crowded trains than London Underground users. Both user groups have a similar dispreference to transfers after controlling for the time spent on transfer, but different attitudes to ascending and descending transfers. Topological factors presented on a distorted Metro map are more important than actual topology to passengers’ route choice decisions.

[1]  Kenneth E. Train,et al.  Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2016 .

[2]  Zhan Guo,et al.  Assessing the cost of transfer inconvenience in public transport systems: A case study of the London Underground , 2011 .

[3]  Zhan Guo,et al.  Mind the Map! The Impact of Transit Maps on Path Choice in Public Transit , 2011 .

[4]  Piet H. L. Bovy,et al.  Modelling route choice behaviour in multi-modal transport networks , 2005 .

[5]  John Douglas Hunt,et al.  A LOGIT MODEL OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT ROUTE CHOICE , 1990 .

[6]  Hartwig H. Hochmair,et al.  The Influence of Map Design on Route Choice from Public Transportation Maps in Urban Areas , 2009 .

[7]  E. Cascetta,et al.  A MODIFIED LOGIT ROUTE CHOICE MODEL OVERCOMING PATH OVERLAPPING PROBLEMS. SPECIFICATION AND SOME CALIBRATION RESULTS FOR INTERURBAN NETWORKS , 1996 .

[8]  Robert B. Dial,et al.  A PROBABILISTIC MULTIPATH TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT MODEL WHICH OBVIATES PATH ENUMERATION. IN: THE AUTOMOBILE , 1971 .

[9]  Piotr Jankowski,et al.  Map-centred exploratory approach to multiple criteria spatial decision making , 2001, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[10]  P. Bovy,et al.  ROUTE CHOICE: WAYFINDING IN TRANSPORT NETWORKS , 1990 .

[11]  S. Bekhor,et al.  Route Choice Models Used in the Stochastic User Equilibrium Problem: A Review , 2004 .

[12]  Jonathan M. Bunker,et al.  Transit Users’ Route‐Choice Modelling in Transit Assignment: A Review , 2010 .

[13]  Carlo G. Prato,et al.  Route choice modeling: past, present and future research directions , 2009 .

[14]  Sebastián Raveau,et al.  A topological route choice model for metro , 2011 .

[15]  Michael Scott Ramming,et al.  NETWORK KNOWLEDGE AND ROUTE CHOICE , 2002 .

[16]  D. McFadden Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .