Predictive entrainment of natural speech through two fronto-motor top-down channels

Natural communication between interlocutors is enabled by the ability to predict upcoming speech in a given context. Previously we showed that these predictions rely on a fronto-motor top-down control of low-frequency oscillations in auditory-temporal brain areas that track intelligible speech. However, a comprehensive spatio-temporal characterisation of this effect is still missing. Here, we applied transfer entropy to source-localised MEG data during continuous speech perception. First, at low frequencies (1-4 Hz, brain delta phase to speech delta phase), predictive effects start in left fronto-motor regions and progress to right temporal regions. Second, at higher frequencies (14-18 Hz, brain beta power to speech delta phase), predictive patterns show a transition from left inferior frontal gyrus via left precentral gyrus to left primary auditory areas. Our results suggest a progression of prediction processes from higher-order to early sensory areas in at least two different frequency channels.

[1]  David Poeppel,et al.  The analysis of speech in different temporal integration windows: cerebral lateralization as 'asymmetric sampling in time' , 2003, Speech Commun..

[2]  D. Poeppel,et al.  Cortical Tracking of Hierarchical Linguistic Structures in Connected Speech , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  Riitta Salmelin,et al.  A multimodal spectral approach to characterize rhythm in natural speech. , 2016, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Nai Xia,et al.  Method of Registration , 2014 .

[5]  Stefano Panzeri,et al.  Estimating Information-Theoretic Quantities , 2015, Encyclopedia of Computational Neuroscience.

[6]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Canonical Microcircuits for Predictive Coding , 2012, Neuron.

[7]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). , 2011, Annual review of psychology.

[8]  Zachary M. Smith,et al.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception , 2002, Nature.

[9]  Joachim Gross,et al.  The effect of filtering on Granger causality based multivariate causality measures , 2010, NeuroImage.

[10]  L. Timmermann,et al.  The influence of filtering and downsampling on the estimation of transfer entropy , 2017, PloS one.

[11]  Joachim Gross,et al.  Good practice for conducting and reporting MEG research , 2013, NeuroImage.

[12]  M. Pickering,et al.  Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  J. Massey.  CAUSALITY, FEEDBACK AND DIRECTED INFORMATION , 1990 .

[14]  J. E. Tree.  Listeners' uses of um and uh in speech comprehension. , 2001 .

[15]  Uri Hasson,et al.  The neurobiology of uncertainty: implications for statistical learning , 2017, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  Björn Herrmann,et al.  Neural Alpha Dynamics in Younger and Older Listeners Reflect Acoustic Challenges and Predictive Benefits , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  A. Seth,et al.  Granger causality and transfer entropy are equivalent for Gaussian variables. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[18]  David Poeppel,et al.  Cortical oscillations and speech processing: emerging computational principles and operations , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  Schreiber,et al.  Measuring information transfer , 2000, Physical review letters.

[20]  Asif A. Ghazanfar,et al.  The Natural Statistics of Audiovisual Speech , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[21]  Sylvain Baillet,et al.  Motor origin of temporal predictions in auditory attention , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Oded Ghitza,et al.  Linking Speech Perception and Neurophysiology: Speech Decoding Guided by Cascaded Oscillators Locked to the Input Rhythm , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[23]  G. Nolte.  The magnetic lead field theorem in the quasi-static approximation and its use for magnetoencephalography forward calculation in realistic volume conductors. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  P. Matthews,et al.  Defining a left-lateralized response specific to intelligible speech using fMRI. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[25]  Aniruddh D. Patel,et al.  Temporal modulations in speech and music , 2017, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[26]  Gregory B. Cogan,et al.  Visual Input Enhances Selective Speech Envelope Tracking in Auditory Cortex at a “Cocktail Party” , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[28]  Riitta Salmelin,et al.  Corticomuscular Coherence Is Tuned to the Spontaneous Rhythmicity of Speech at 2–3 Hz , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  Andreas Bartels,et al.  A novel test to determine the significance of neural selectivity to single and multiple potentially correlated stimulus features , 2012, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[30]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data , 2010, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[31]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[32]  Guillaume A. Rousselet,et al.  Robust Correlation Analyses: False Positive and Power Validation Using a New Open Source Matlab Toolbox , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[33]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[34]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Active inference, communication and hermeneutics , 2015, Cortex.

[35]  Anne-Lise Giraud,et al.  The contribution of frequency-specific activity to hierarchical information processing in the human auditory cortex , 2014, Nature Communications.

[36]  S. Levinson.  Turn-taking in Human Communication – Origins and Implications for Language Processing , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[37]  P. Schyns,et al.  Speech Rhythms and Multiplexed Oscillatory Sensory Coding in the Human Brain , 2013, PLoS biology.

[38]  M. Pickering,et al.  An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. , 2013, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[39]  Stefano Panzeri,et al.  Correcting for the sampling bias problem in spike train information measures. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[40]  Gregor Thut,et al.  Lip movements entrain the observers’ low-frequency brain oscillations to facilitate speech intelligibility , 2016, eLife.

[41]  J. E. Tree.  The Effects of False Starts and Repetitions on the Processing of Subsequent Words in Spontaneous Speech , 1995 .

[42]  G. Karmos,et al.  Entrainment of Neuronal Oscillations as a Mechanism of Attentional Selection , 2008, Science.

[43]  C. Granger.  Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods , 1969 .

[44]  Stefano Panzeri,et al.  Contributions of local speech encoding and functional connectivity to audio-visual speech perception , 2017, eLife.

[45]  Robin A. A. Ince,et al.  Frontal Top-Down Signals Increase Coupling of Auditory Low-Frequency Oscillations to Continuous Speech in Human Listeners , 2015, Current Biology.

[46]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Prediction, Bayesian inference and feedback in speech recognition , 2015, Language, cognition and neuroscience.

[47]  A. Nobre,et al.  Alpha Oscillations Related to Anticipatory Attention Follow Temporal Expectations , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[48]  Keikichi Hirose,et al.  Temporal rate change of dialogue speech in prosodic units as compared to read speech , 2002, Speech Commun..

[49]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[50]  A. Nobre,et al.  Temporal Expectation Enhances Contrast Sensitivity by Phase Entrainment of Low-Frequency Oscillations in Visual Cortex , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[51]  Anne-Lise Giraud,et al.  θ-Band and β-Band Neural Activity Reflects Independent Syllable Tracking and Comprehension of Time-Compressed Speech , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[52]  Luc H. Arnal,et al.  Cortical oscillations and sensory predictions , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.