Increasing the detail of European land use/cover data by combining heterogeneous data sets

ABSTRACT Data on land use and land cover (LULC) are a vital input for policy-relevant research, such as modelling of the human population, socioeconomic activities, transportation, environment, and their interactions. In Europe, CORINE Land Cover has been the only data set covering the entire continent consistently, but with rather limited spatial detail. Other data sets have provided much better detail, but either have covered only a fraction of Europe (e.g. Urban Atlas) or have been thematically restricted (e.g. Copernicus High Resolution Layers). In this study, we processed and combined diverse LULC data to create a harmonised, ready-to-use map covering 41 countries. By doing so, we increased the spatial detail (from 25 to one hectare) and the thematic detail (by seven additional LULC classes) compared to the CORINE Land Cover. Importantly, we decomposed the class ‘Industrial and commercial units’ into ‘Production facilities’, ‘Commercial/service facilities’ and ‘Public facilities’ using machine learning to exploit a large database of points of interest. The overall accuracy of this thematic breakdown was 74%, despite the confusion between the production and commercial land uses, often attributable to noisy training data or mixed land uses. Lessons learnt from this exercise are discussed, and further research direction is proposed.

[1]  Christoph Aubrecht,et al.  VGDI – Advancing the Concept: Volunteered Geo‐Dynamic Information and its Benefits for Population Dynamics Modeling , 2017, Trans. GIS.

[2]  C. Tsinaraki,et al.  Using Foursquare place data for estimating building block use , 2017 .

[3]  Xiaoping Liu,et al.  Sensing spatial distribution of urban land use by integrating points-of-interest and Google Word2Vec model , 2017, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[4]  Martino Pesaresi,et al.  A new map of the European settlements by automatic classification of 2.5m resolution SPOT data , 2014, 2014 IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[5]  Jamal Jokar Arsanjani,et al.  Assessing the suitability of GlobeLand30 for mapping land cover in Germany , 2016, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[6]  Pascal Neis,et al.  Quality assessment for building footprints data on OpenStreetMap , 2014, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[7]  Ricardo Muñoz,et al.  Land Use detection with cell phone data using topic models: Case Santiago, Chile , 2017, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[8]  Carola Kunze,et al.  Semantic enrichment of building data with volunteered geographic information to improve mappings of dwelling units and population , 2015, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[9]  Chaogui Kang,et al.  Social Sensing: A New Approach to Understanding Our Socioeconomic Environments , 2015 .

[10]  Stefan Dech,et al.  A semi-automated approach for the generation of a new land use and land cover product for Germany based on Landsat time-series and Lucas in-situ data , 2017 .

[11]  J. Gutiérrez,et al.  Exploring the limitations of CORINE Land Cover for monitoring urban land-use dynamics in metropolitan areas , 2014 .

[12]  F. J. Gallego,et al.  Disaggregating population density of the European Union with CORINE land cover , 2011, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[13]  Perpiña Castillo Carolina,et al.  Chapter 24 Land Use and Scenario Modeling for Integrated Sustainability Assessment , 2016 .

[14]  R. W. Tomlinson,et al.  Application of CORINE land-cover mapping to estimate carbon stored in the vegetation of Ireland , 2000 .

[15]  György Büttner,et al.  CORINE Land Cover and Land Cover Change Products , 2014 .

[16]  Clemens Mensink,et al.  Spatial interpolation of air pollution measurements using CORINE land cover data , 2008 .

[17]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[18]  Emmanouil Tranos,et al.  Evaluating the Impact of Land-Use Density and Mix on Spatiotemporal Urban Activity Patterns: An Exploratory Study Using Mobile Phone Data , 2014 .

[19]  M. Bossard,et al.  CORINE land cover technical guide - Addendum 2000 , 2000 .

[20]  Batista E Silva Filipe,et al.  A geographical database of Infrastructures in Europe - A contribution to the knowledge base of the LUISA modelling platform , 2015 .

[21]  C. Lavalle,et al.  A procedure to obtain a refined European land use/cover map , 2013 .

[22]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[23]  Michael Schultz,et al.  Open land cover from OpenStreetMap and remote sensing , 2017, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[24]  Mark Rounsevell,et al.  The limitations of spatial land use data in environmental analysis , 2006 .

[25]  David M. Theobald,et al.  Development and Applications of a Comprehensive Land Use Classification and Map for the US , 2014, PloS one.

[26]  P. Verburg,et al.  From land cover change to land function dynamics: a major challenge to improve land characterization. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[27]  Catherine Linard,et al.  Disaggregating Census Data for Population Mapping Using Random Forests with Remotely-Sensed and Ancillary Data , 2015, PloS one.

[28]  C. Cartalis,et al.  Daytime urban heat islands from Landsat ETM+ and Corine land cover data: An application to major cities in Greece , 2007 .

[29]  Ferri Stefano,et al.  Operating procedure for the production of the Global Human Settlement Layer from Landsat data of the epochs 1975, 1990, 2000, and 2014 , 2016 .

[30]  Huadong Guo,et al.  A Global Human Settlement Layer From Optical HR/VHR RS Data: Concept and First Results , 2013, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[31]  Francisco C. Pereira,et al.  Mining point-of-interest data from social networks for urban land use classification and disaggregation , 2015, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[32]  Chenghu Zhou,et al.  A new insight into land use classification based on aggregated mobile phone data , 2013, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[33]  Vanessa Frías-Martínez,et al.  Spectral clustering for sensing urban land use using Twitter activity , 2014, Engineering applications of artificial intelligence.

[34]  Alexander Zipf,et al.  Quality Evaluation of VGI Using Authoritative Data - A Comparison with Land Use Data in Southern Germany , 2015, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[35]  Marco Minghini,et al.  Generating Up-to-Date and Detailed Land Use and Land Cover Maps Using OpenStreetMap and GlobeLand30 , 2017, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[36]  Batista E Silva Filipe,et al.  Spatiotemporal mapping of population in Europe: The ENACT project in a nutshell , 2017 .

[37]  Jacinto Estima,et al.  Investigating the Potential of OpenStreetMap for Land Use/Land Cover Production: A Case Study for Continental Portugal , 2015, OpenStreetMap in GIScience.

[38]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Statistical Modeling: The Two Cultures (with comments and a rejoinder by the author) , 2001 .

[39]  Peter van Oosterom,et al.  Computers, Environment and Urban Systems , 2009 .

[40]  Vasco Diogo,et al.  The LUISA Territorial Reference Scenario 2017: A technical description , 2017 .

[41]  Colin Robertson,et al.  A multi-scale approach to exploring urban places in geotagged photographs , 2015, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[42]  James A. Cheshire,et al.  Deriving retail centre locations and catchments from geo-tagged Twitter data , 2017, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[43]  Steffen Fritz,et al.  Investigating the Feasibility of Geo-Tagged Photographs as Sources of Land Cover Input Data , 2016, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[44]  C. Tomlin Geographic information systems and cartographic modeling , 1990 .

[45]  Alexander Zipf,et al.  Toward mapping land-use patterns from volunteered geographic information , 2013, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[46]  J. Bolliger,et al.  Enhanced land use datasets and future scenarios of land change for Slovakia , 2017, Data in brief.

[47]  Eric Vaz,et al.  An assessment of a collaborative mapping approach for exploring land use patterns for several European metropolises , 2015, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.