Neurosensory Assessments of Concussion.

The purpose of this research was to determine if cortical metrics-a unique set of sensory-based assessment tools-could be used to characterize and differentiate concussed individuals from nonconcussed individuals. Cortical metrics take advantage of the somatotopic relationship between skin and cortex, and the protocols are designed to evoke interactions between adjacent cortical regions to investigate fundamental mechanisms that mediate cortical-cortical interactions. Student athletes, aged 18 to 22 years, were recruited into the study through an athletic training center that made determinations of postconcussion return-to-play status. Sensory-based performance tasks utilizing vibrotactile stimuli applied to tips of the index and middle fingers were administered to test an individual's amplitude discrimination, temporal order judgment, and duration discrimination capacity in the presence and absence of illusion-inducing conditioning stimuli. Comparison of the performances in the presence and absence of conditioning stimuli demonstrated differences between concussed and nonconcussed individuals. Additionally, mathematically combining results from the measures yields a unique central nervous system (CNS) profile that describes an individual's information processing capacity. A comparison was made of CNS profiles of concussed vs. nonconcussed individuals and demonstrated with 99% confidence that the two populations are statistically distinct. The study established solid proof-of-concept that cortical metrics have significant potential as a quantitative biomarker of CNS status.

[1]  F. Birklein,et al.  Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): Standardized protocol and reference values , 2006, PAIN.

[2]  B. Whitsel,et al.  Duration-dependent response of SI to vibrotactile stimulation in squirrel monkey. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  N. L. Johnson,et al.  Multivariate Analysis , 1958, Nature.

[4]  Zheng Zhang,et al.  A novel device for the study of somatosensory information processing , 2012, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[5]  V. Tannan,et al.  Vibrotactile adaptation fails to enhance spatial localization in adults with autism , 2007, Brain Research.

[6]  Barry L. Whitsel,et al.  Vibrotactile adaptation enhances spatial localization , 2006, Brain Research.

[7]  Eric M. Francisco,et al.  Somatosensory Information Processing in the Aging Population , 2011, Front. Ag. Neurosci.

[8]  E. Francisco,et al.  Rate dependency of vibrotactile stimulus modulation , 2011, Brain Research.

[9]  Mark Tommerdahl,et al.  Vibrotactile discriminative capacity is impacted in a digit-specific manner with concurrent unattended hand stimulation , 2014, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  V. Tannan,et al.  Effects of the N-methyl-D-Aspartate receptor antagonist dextromethorphan on vibrotactile adaptation , 2008, BMC Neuroscience.

[11]  Mark Tommerdahl,et al.  Dopamine Alters Tactile Perception in Parkinson's Disease , 2012, Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques.

[12]  R. Baron,et al.  Evaluation of symptom heterogeneity in neuropathic pain using assessments of sensory functions , 2009, Neurotherapeutics.

[13]  E. Francisco,et al.  Vibrotactile amplitude discrimination capacity parallels magnitude changes in somatosensory cortex and follows Weber’s Law , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  Mark Tommerdahl,et al.  Effects of stimulus-driven synchronization on sensory perception , 2007, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[15]  G. Baranek,et al.  Perceptual metrics of individuals with autism provide evidence for disinhibition , 2008, Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research.

[16]  M. Tommerdahl,et al.  Continuous theta-burst stimulation modulates tactile synchronization , 2013, BMC Neuroscience.

[17]  V. Tannan,et al.  A portable tactile sensory diagnostic device , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[18]  S. Mostofsky,et al.  A vibrotactile behavioral battery for investigating somatosensory processing in children and adults , 2013, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[19]  S. Wold,et al.  PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics , 2001 .

[20]  Eric M. Francisco,et al.  Altered Central Sensitization in Subgroups of Women With Vulvodynia , 2011, The Clinical journal of pain.

[21]  Mark Tommerdahl,et al.  Impaired tactile processing in children with autism spectrum disorder. , 2014, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  V. Tannan,et al.  Effects of adaptation on the capacity to differentiate simultaneously delivered dual-site vibrotactile stimuli , 2007, Brain Research.

[23]  Mark Tommerdahl,et al.  Amplitude-dependency of response of SI cortex to flutter stimulation , 2005, BMC Neuroscience.

[24]  Mark Tommerdahl,et al.  The impact of non-noxious heat on tactile information processing , 2009, Brain Research.

[25]  Mark Tommerdahl,et al.  Absence of stimulus-driven synchronization effects on sensory perception in autism: Evidence for local underconnectivity? , 2008, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[26]  M. Tommerdahl,et al.  Neurosensory assessments of migraine , 2013, Brain Research.