Lingering Challenges to the Raising‐to‐object and Object‐control Constructions

.  This article provides an overview of the three main approaches to raising-to-object sentences like Cindy believes Marcia to be a genius. The article describes the strengths and challenges faced by these accounts, reaching a number of conclusions. First, the covert ‘‘LF’’ raising account, though successful at accounting for certain interpretational facts about the construction, does not provide an analysis of the word-order facts. Second, the overt raising account, which can account for the word order facts, still faces two main challenges; there remain important open questions about verb placement, and though none of the current approaches to extraction can easily explain it, extraction and raising-to-object interact in complex ways that are still not well understood. Third, the movement theory of control, which treats object control in a way parallel to overt raising-to-object, faces not only the challenges to the overt raising account, but several others particular to object control. Finally, the article describes the HPSG analysis of raising-to-object, which can account straightforwardly for the word order facts, and with the appropriate constraints can be extended to account for the extraction facts discussed.

[1]  Jeffrey T. Runner Noun Phrase Licensing , 1998 .

[2]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Conditions on transformations , 1971 .

[3]  P. Gordon,et al.  Intuitive knowledge of linguistic co-reference , 1997, Cognition.

[4]  Marguerite MacKenzie,et al.  Altruism, -Movement, and Object Agreement in Innu-aimn , 2002, Linguistic Inquiry.

[5]  William D. Davies,et al.  Madurese prolepsis and its implications for a typology of raising , 2005 .

[6]  Carlo Cecchetto,et al.  A Challenge to Null Case Theory , 2004, Linguistic Inquiry.

[7]  James McCloskey The Distribution of Subject Properties in Irish , 2001 .

[8]  Edwin Williams,et al.  PRO and subject of NP , 1985 .

[9]  T F Münte,et al.  Brain Potentials in the Processing of Complex Sentences: An ERP Study of Control and Raising Constructions , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[10]  Irene Philippaki-Warburton,et al.  The theory of empty categories and the pro-drop parameter in Modern Greek , 1987, Journal of Linguistics.

[11]  Tim Stowell,et al.  Raising in Irish and the Projection Principle , 1989 .

[12]  James Hye Suk Yoon,et al.  Ambiguity of government and the Chain Condition , 1996 .

[13]  Susi Wurmbrand,et al.  The Domain of Agreement , 2005 .

[14]  R Hudson,et al.  Case-agreement, PRO and structure sharing , 2003 .

[15]  J. A. du Plessis,et al.  Distribution of the complementizer ukuba in the Xhosa sentence , 1989 .

[16]  Masatoshi Koizumi Object agreement phrases and the Split VP Hypothesis , 1993 .

[17]  J. Koster On binding and control , 1984 .

[18]  M. Tallerman,et al.  The uniform Case-licensing of subjects in Welsh , 1998 .

[19]  Richard S. Kayne Facets of Romance past participle agreement , 1989 .

[20]  Masatoshi Koizumi Phrase Structure in Minimalist Syntax , 1998 .

[21]  John R. Moore,et al.  Turkish Copy-Raising and A-chain Locality , 1998 .

[22]  A. Kratzer Severing the External Argument from its Verb , 1996 .

[23]  Emmon W. Bach,et al.  On Raising: One Rule of English Grammar and Its Theoretical Implications , 1978 .

[24]  Benjamin Bruening,et al.  Syntax at the edge : cross-clausal phenomena and the syntax of passamaquoddy , 2001 .

[25]  James Mccloskey Raising, subcategorization and selection in modern Irish , 1984, Natural Language & Linguistic Theory.

[26]  James Mccloskey Quantifier Float and Wh-Movement in an Irish English , 2000, Linguistic Inquiry.

[27]  Geoffrey K. Pullum,et al.  Expletive noun phrases in subcategorized positions , 1988 .

[28]  IDAN LANDAU,et al.  The Scale of Finiteness and the Calculus of Control , 2004 .

[29]  Felicia Lee,et al.  Anaphoric R-Expressions as Bound Variables , 2002 .

[30]  Irene Phipippaki-Warburton,et al.  On Control in Greek , 1999 .

[31]  Steven Franks,et al.  THE SYNTAX OF ADVERBIAL PARTICIPLES IN RUSSIAN REVISITED , 1998 .

[32]  Ž. Bošković On Multiple Wh -Fronting , 2002 .

[33]  Claire Moyse-Faurie Syntactic and pragmatic functions of pronominal arguments in some Western Polynesian languages , 1997 .

[34]  Stanley Dubinsky,et al.  On Extraction From NPS , 2003 .

[35]  B. Mittelman,et al.  On control. , 1979, Dental management.

[36]  Viviane Deprez,et al.  Raising constructions in Haitian Creole , 1992 .

[37]  Pauline Jacobson,et al.  Raising without Movement , 1992 .

[38]  Diane Massam,et al.  Case theory and the projection principle , 1985 .

[39]  I. Landau Movement-Resistant Aspects of Control , 2007 .

[40]  Carson T. Schütze English Expletive Constructions Are Not Infected , 1999 .

[41]  I. Landau Movement Out of Control , 2003, Linguistic Inquiry.

[42]  Mürvet Enç,et al.  Pronouns, licensing, and binding , 1989 .

[43]  L. Rizzi The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery , 1997 .

[44]  B. Partee Nominal and temporal anaphora , 1984 .

[45]  J. Zwart The Minimalist Program , 1998, Journal of Linguistics.

[46]  Stanley Dubinsky,et al.  The grammar of raising and control , 2004 .

[47]  Sandra Chung Restructuring and verb‐initial order in chamorro , 2004 .

[48]  Maria Polinsky,et al.  Agreement in Tsez , 1999 .

[49]  Cedric Boeckx,et al.  A Note on Contraction , 2000, Linguistic Inquiry.

[50]  Norbert Hornstein,et al.  Secondary Predication in Russian and Proper Government of PRO , 1992 .

[51]  R. Bhatt Long Distance Agreement in Hindi-Urdu , 2005 .

[52]  David M. Perlmutter,et al.  Language-Internal Explanation: The Distribution of Russian Impersonals , 2003 .

[53]  Jeffrey T. Runner,et al.  Noun phrase licensing and interpretation , 1995 .

[54]  Peter Steven Rosenbaum,et al.  The grammar of English predicate complement constructions , 1967 .

[55]  Alexandr Rosen,et al.  Czech and Polish Raising/Control with or without Structure Sharing , 2004 .

[56]  Samuel David Epstein,et al.  Derivation and explanation in the Minimalist Program , 2002 .

[57]  Kyle B. Johnson Object positions , 1991 .

[58]  Wendy K. Wilkins,et al.  Control, PRO, and the Projection Principle , 1986 .

[59]  Dwight L. Bolinger Apparent Constituents in Surface Structure , 1967 .

[60]  D. Jonas Clause Structure, Expletives and Verb Movement , 1996 .

[61]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  On Wh-Movement , 1977 .

[62]  Maria Polinsky,et al.  Long-Distance Agreement And Topic In Tsez , 2001 .

[63]  Höskuldur Thráinsson Object Shift and Scrambling , 2008 .

[64]  Mürvet Enç Anchoring conditions for tense , 1987 .

[65]  Leslie Barrett,et al.  The Null Content of Null Case , 2002 .

[66]  B. Partee Some Structural Analogies between Tenses and Pronouns in English , 1973 .

[67]  William R. Cantrall,et al.  Viewpoint, reflexives, and the nature of noun phrases , 1974 .

[68]  Paul M. Postal,et al.  Skeptical Linguistic Essays , 2004 .

[69]  M. D. Dikken,et al.  Binding, expletives, and levels , 1995 .

[70]  Halldor Armann Sigurðsson,et al.  Icelandic Case-marked PRO and the licensing of lexical arguments , 1991 .

[71]  Ash Asudeh,et al.  Control and semantic resource sensitivity , 2005, Journal of Linguistics.

[72]  Andrew Carnie,et al.  Non-Verbal Predication and Head-Movement by , 1995 .

[73]  Joan Bresnan,et al.  Locative inversion in Chichewa: a case study of factorization in grammar , 1989 .

[74]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Book Reviews: Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar and German in Head-driven Phrase-structure Grammar , 1996, CL.

[75]  Samuel David Epstein,et al.  Minimal Ideas: syntactic studies in the minimalist framework , 1996 .

[76]  Chungmin Lee,et al.  Backward Object Control in Korean , 2003 .

[77]  Noam Chomsky Three Factors in Language Design , 2005, Linguistic Inquiry.

[78]  N. Hornstein Movement and Control , 1999, Linguistic Inquiry.

[79]  Juan Uriagereka Multiple spell-out , 2005 .

[80]  Jeffrey T. Runner,et al.  The Accusative Plus Infinitive Construction in English , 2007 .

[81]  Richard A. Hudson,et al.  Functional control with and without structure- sharing , 1998 .

[82]  Peter W Culicover,et al.  The Semantic Basis of Control in English , 2003 .

[83]  Juan Uriagereka,et al.  CYCLICITY AND EXTRACTION DOMAINS , 2000 .

[84]  Patrick Farrell,et al.  Backward Control in Brazilian Portuguese , 1995 .

[85]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  An Integrated Theory of Complement Control. , 1991 .

[86]  N. Hornstein Move! : a minimalist theory of construal , 2000 .

[87]  Cedric Boeckx,et al.  Reply to Control Is Not Movement , 2003, Linguistic Inquiry.

[88]  J. Bobaljik,et al.  A-Chains At The Pf-Interface: Copies And `Covert Movement , 2002 .

[89]  D. Bolinger Syntactic Blends and Other Matters , 1961 .

[90]  Cedric Boeckx,et al.  Movement under Control , 2004, Linguistic Inquiry.

[91]  Roger Martin,et al.  Null Case and the Distribution of PRO , 2001, Linguistic Inquiry.

[92]  Hidekazu Tanaka,et al.  Raising to Object out of CP , 2002, Linguistic Inquiry.

[93]  Maria Polinsky The marvels of Tsakhur , 2003 .

[94]  Cedric Boeckx,et al.  In)Direct Binding , 2003 .

[95]  R. Langacker Raising and Transparency. , 1995 .

[96]  T. Reinhart,et al.  Pronouns, Anaphors and Case , 1995 .

[97]  James McCloskey,et al.  Resumption, Successive Cyclicity, and the Locality of Operations , 2008 .

[98]  Jairo Nunes,et al.  Sideward Movement , 2001, Linguistic Inquiry.

[99]  E. Engdahl Parasitic gaps, resumptive pronouns, and subject extractions , 1985 .

[100]  Eduardo Raposo Case theory and infl-to-comp: the inflected infinitive in European Portuguese , 1987 .

[101]  N. Sobin Agreement, default rules, and grammatical viruses , 1997 .