Quantification of the uncertainty within a SAS-SST simulation caused by the unknown high-wavenumber damping factor

Abstract This paper aims to quantify the uncertainty in the SAS-SST simulation of a prism bluff-body flow due to varying the higher-wavenumber damping factor ( C s ). Instead of performing the uncertainty quantification on the CFD simulation directly, a surrogate modelling approach is adopted. The mesh sensitivity is first studied and the numerical error due to the mesh is approximated accordingly. The Gaussian processes/Kriging method is used to generate surrogate models for quantities of interest (QoIs). The suitability of the surrogate models is assessed using the leave-one-out cross-validation tests (LOO-CV). The stochastic tests are then performed using the cross-validated surrogate models to quantify the uncertainty of QoIs by varying C s . Four prior probability density functions (such as U 0 , 1 , N 0.5 , 0.1 2 , B e t a 2 , 2 and B e t a 5 , 1.5 ) of C s are considered. It is demonstrated in this study that the uncertainty of a predicted QoI due to varying C s is regionally dependent. The flow statistics in the near wake of the prism body are subject to larger variance due to the uncertainty in C s . The influence of C s rapidly decays as the location moves downstream. The response of different QoIs to the changing C s varies greatly. Therefore, the calibration of C s only using observations of one variable may bias the results. Last but not least, it is important to consider different sources of uncertainties within the numerical model when scrutinising a turbulence model, as ignoring the contributions to the total error may lead to biased conclusions.

[1]  Thomas J. Santner,et al.  Design and analysis of computer experiments , 1998 .

[2]  Th. Frank,et al.  Investigation of the thermal mixing in a T-junction flow with different SRS approaches , 2014 .

[3]  D. K. Walters,et al.  Validation of OpenFOAM numerical methods and turbulence models for incompressible bluff body flows , 2015 .

[4]  Nhat-Duc Hoang,et al.  Estimating Compressive Strength of High Performance Concrete with Gaussian Process Regression Model , 2016 .

[5]  Claudio Bruno,et al.  The coupling of turbulence and chemistry in a premixed bluff-body flame as studied by LES , 2004 .

[6]  Florian R. Menter,et al.  A Scale-Adaptive Simulation Model for Turbulent Flow Predictions , 2003 .

[7]  Omar M. Knio,et al.  Spectral Methods for Uncertainty Quantification , 2010 .

[8]  Danny C. Sorensen,et al.  Nonlinear Model Reduction via Discrete Empirical Interpolation , 2010, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[9]  Stefan Bauer,et al.  Model Selection for Gaussian Process Regression , 2017, GCPR.

[10]  Gianluigi Rozza,et al.  Parametric POD-Galerkin Model Order Reduction for Unsteady-State Heat Transfer Problems , 2018, Communications in Computational Physics.

[11]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[12]  Florian R. Menter,et al.  The Scale-Adaptive Simulation Method for Unsteady Turbulent Flow Predictions. Part 2: Application to Complex Flows , 2010 .

[13]  Guillaume Puigt,et al.  On the influence of uncertainty in computational simulations of a high-speed jet flow from an aircraft exhaust , 2019, Computers & Fluids.

[14]  Chao Yan,et al.  Comparative assessment of SAS and DES turbulence modeling for massively separated flows , 2016 .

[15]  F. Thiele,et al.  Sensitivity of turbulent shedding flows to non-linear stress–strain relations and Reynolds stress models , 2000 .

[16]  Florian R. Menter,et al.  The Scale-Adaptive Simulation Method for Unsteady Turbulent Flow Predictions. Part 1: Theory and Model Description , 2010 .

[17]  Lei Du,et al.  Scale Adaptive Simulation of Flows Past an Airfoil After Stall , 2012 .

[18]  Guilhem Lacaze,et al.  Uncertainty quantification in LES of a turbulent bluff-body stabilized flame , 2015 .

[19]  Chao Yan,et al.  Adaptive non-intrusive reduced order modeling for compressible flows , 2019, J. Comput. Phys..

[20]  Gianluigi Rozza,et al.  A Hybrid Reduced Order Method for Modelling Turbulent Heat Transfer Problems , 2019, Computers & Fluids.

[21]  J. Alonso,et al.  Using gradients to construct cokriging approximation models for high-dimensional design optimization problems , 2002 .

[22]  Yu Duan,et al.  Fixed inducing points online Bayesian calibration for computer models with an application to a scale-resolving CFD simulation , 2021, J. Comput. Phys..

[23]  Mark Ebden,et al.  Gaussian Processes: A Quick Introduction , 2015, 1505.02965.

[24]  Ellad B. Tadmor,et al.  Uncertainty quantification in molecular simulations with dropout neural network potentials , 2020, npj Computational Materials.

[25]  Mehrdad Raisee,et al.  Efficient uncertainty quantification of turbine blade leading edge film cooling using bi-fidelity combination of compressed sensing and Kriging , 2020, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer.

[26]  F. R. Menter,et al.  Revisiting the Turbulent Scale Equation , 2006 .

[27]  Habib N. Najm,et al.  Uncertainty Quantification and Polynomial Chaos Techniques in Computational Fluid Dynamics , 2009 .

[28]  Xinyuan Ke,et al.  Coupling machine learning with thermodynamic modelling to develop a composition-property model for alkali-activated materials , 2021, Composites Part B: Engineering.

[29]  K. K. Choi,et al.  Development and validation of a dynamic metamodel based on stochastic radial basis functions and uncertainty quantification , 2014, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[30]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Gaussian processes for machine learning , 2005, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[31]  Ahsan Kareem,et al.  A multi-fidelity shape optimization via surrogate modeling for civil structures , 2018, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics.

[32]  Abdelkader Frendi,et al.  Uncertainty Quantification of Turbulence Model Coefficients via Latin Hypercube Sampling Method , 2011 .

[33]  Florian R. Menter,et al.  A Scale-Adaptive Simulation Model using Two-Equation Models , 2005 .

[34]  Wei Chen,et al.  Analytical Variance-Based Global Sensitivity Analysis in Simulation-Based Design Under Uncertainty , 2005 .

[35]  D. Krige A statistical approach to some basic mine valuation problems on the Witwatersrand, by D.G. Krige, published in the Journal, December 1951 : introduction by the author , 1951 .

[36]  Santosh J. Shanbhogue,et al.  Lean blowoff of bluff body stabilized flames: Scaling and dynamics , 2009 .

[37]  Karen Willcox,et al.  A Survey of Projection-Based Model Reduction Methods for Parametric Dynamical Systems , 2015, SIAM Rev..

[38]  B. Blocken,et al.  CFD analysis of dynamic stall on vertical axis wind turbines using Scale-Adaptive Simulation (SAS): Comparison against URANS and hybrid RANS/LES , 2019, Energy Conversion and Management.

[39]  Nico S. Gorbach,et al.  Model Selection for Gaussian Process Regression by Approximation Set Coding , 2016, 1610.00907.

[40]  E. Amani,et al.  A comparative study of turbulence models for non-premixed swirl-stabilized flames , 2018, Journal of Turbulence.

[41]  Youssef M. Marzouk,et al.  Improved profile fitting and quantification of uncertainty in experimental measurements of impurity transport coefficients using Gaussian process regression , 2015 .

[42]  Soshi Kawai,et al.  Kriging-model-based uncertainty quantification in computational fluid dynamics , 2014 .

[43]  C. Hasse,et al.  A Combined Numerical and Experimental Study of the 3D Tumble Structure and Piston Boundary Layer Development During the Intake Stroke of a Gasoline Engine , 2017 .

[44]  D. Xiu Fast numerical methods for stochastic computations: A review , 2009 .

[45]  Pierre Sagaut,et al.  Sensitivity of two-dimensional spatially developing mixing layers with respect to uncertain inflow conditions , 2008 .

[46]  O. L. Maître,et al.  Spectral Methods for Uncertainty Quantification: With Applications to Computational Fluid Dynamics , 2010 .

[47]  Wolfgang Rodi,et al.  Simulation of vortex shedding past a square cylinder with different turbulence models , 1998 .

[48]  John Sheridan,et al.  The performance of different turbulence models (URANS, SAS and DES) for predicting high-speed train slipstream , 2017 .

[49]  Johan Meyers,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of large-eddy simulations to subgrid-scale-model parametric uncertainty using polynomial chaos , 2007, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[50]  Ahsan Kareem,et al.  Aerodynamic shape optimization of civil structures: A CFD-enabled Kriging-based approach , 2015 .

[51]  Yu Duan,et al.  A Bayesian machine learning approach for inverse prediction of high-performance concrete ingredients with targeted performance , 2020, Construction and Building Materials.

[52]  Maziar Arjomandi,et al.  The effect of arrangement of two circular cylinders on the maximum efficiency of Vortex-Induced Vibration power using a Scale-Adaptive Simulation model , 2014 .

[53]  Pierre Sagaut,et al.  Stochastic response of the laminar flow past a flat plate under uncertain inflow conditions , 2012 .

[54]  F. Menter,et al.  Development and Application of SST-SAS Turbulence Model in the DESIDER Project , 2008 .

[55]  Gianluigi Rozza,et al.  Data-Driven POD-Galerkin Reduced Order Model for Turbulent Flows , 2019, J. Comput. Phys..

[56]  Saeid Nahavandi,et al.  Neural Network-Based Uncertainty Quantification: A Survey of Methodologies and Applications , 2018, IEEE Access.

[57]  Panagiotis Spyridis,et al.  Machine learning-based models for the concrete breakout capacity prediction of single anchors in shear , 2020, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[58]  Xiaorong Guan,et al.  A production limiter study of SST-SAS turbulence model for bluff body flows , 2017 .

[59]  Yuan Yao,et al.  Meta‐Model‐Based Calibration and Sensitivity Studies of Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of Jet Pumps , 2017 .

[60]  Jeong-Soo Park,et al.  A statistical method for tuning a computer code to a data base , 2001 .

[61]  Mohammad Reza Ghasemi,et al.  Comparative studies of metamodeling and AI-Based techniques in damage detection of structures , 2018, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[62]  David Matthew Burton,et al.  Assessment of various turbulence models (ELES, SAS, URANS and RANS) for predicting the aerodynamics of freight train container wagons , 2017 .

[63]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Curve Fitting and Optimal Design for Prediction , 1978 .

[64]  Ji Soo Ahn,et al.  Using a Gaussian process regression inspired method to measure agreement between the experiment and CFD simulations , 2019 .

[65]  A. Sjunnesson,et al.  CARS measurements and visualization of reacting flows in a bluff body stabilized flame , 1992 .