A comparison of response time and word recognition measures using a word-monitoring and closed-set identification task.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] WILLIAM MARSLEN-WILSON,et al. Processing structure of sentence perception , 1975, Nature.
[2] S Gatehouse,et al. Role of perceptual acclimatization in the selection of frequency responses for hearing aids. , 1993, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[3] R. Stark,et al. Sentence processing in language-impaired children under conditions of filtering and time compression , 1995, Applied Psycholinguistics.
[4] K. D. Kryter,et al. ARTICULATION-TESTING METHODS: CONSONANTAL DIFFERENTIATION WITH A CLOSED-RESPONSE SET. , 1965, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[5] David B Pisoni,et al. Comprehension of natural and synthetic speech: effects of predictability on the verification of sentences controlled for intelligibility. , 1987, Computer speech & language.
[6] B C Moore,et al. Spectral contrast enhancement of speech in noise for listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment: effects on intelligibility, quality, and response times. , 1993, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.
[7] S Gatehouse,et al. Response times to speech stimuli as measures of benefit from amplification. , 1990, British journal of audiology.
[8] R. L. Pratt. On the use of reaction time as a measure of intelligibility. , 1981, British journal of audiology.
[9] D. Mewhort,et al. Analysis of Response Time Distributions: An Example Using the Stroop Task , 1991 .
[10] Karl D. Kryter,et al. A Proposed Clinical Test of Speech Discrimination , 1968 .