Relative suitability of indices derived from Landsat ETM+ and SPOT 5 for detecting fire severity in sagebrush steppe

Remote sensing indices of burn area and fire severity have been developed and tested for forest ecosystems, but not sparsely vegetated, desert shrub-steppe in which large wildfires are a common occurrence and a major issue for land management. We compared the performance of remote sensing indices for detecting burn area and fire severity with extensive ground-based cover assessments made before and after the prescribed burning of a 3 km 2 shrub-steppe area. The remote sensing indices were based on either Landsat 7 ETM+ or SPOT 5 data, using either single or multiple dates of imagery. The indices delineating burned versus unburned areas had better overall, User, and Producer’s accuracies than indices delineating levels of fire severity. The Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI) calculated from SPOT had the greatest overall accuracy (100%) in delineating burned versus unburned areas. The relative differenced Normalized Burn Ratio (RdNBR) using Landsat ETM+ provided the highest accuracies (73% overall accuracy) for delineating fire severity. Though SPOT’s spatial resolution likely conferred advantages for determining burn boundaries, the higher spectral resolution (particularly band 7, 2.21 mm) of Landsat ETM+ may be necessary for detecting differences in fire severity in sparsely vegetated shrub-steppe.

[1]  Giovanna Cecchi,et al.  Remote senging for earth science, ocean, and sea ice applications : 20-24 September 1999, Florence, Italy , 1999 .

[2]  Heiko Balzter,et al.  Forest fire scar detection in the boreal forest with multitemporal SPOT-VEGETATION data , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[3]  Paul A. Keddy,et al.  North American Terrestrial Vegetation , 1988 .

[4]  D. Roberts,et al.  Practical limits on hyperspectral vegetation discrimination in arid and semiarid environments , 2001 .

[5]  K. Ryan,et al.  Evaluating Prescribed Fires , 1985 .

[6]  P. Gessler,et al.  Evaluation of novel thermally enhanced spectral indices for mapping fire perimeters and comparisons with fire atlas data , 2005 .

[7]  Roy O. Harniss,et al.  30 years of vegetal change following burning of sagebrush-grass range. , 1973 .

[8]  M. Wimberly,et al.  Assessment of fire severity and species diversity in the southern Appalachians using Landsat TM and ETM+ imagery , 2007 .

[9]  S. Arno,et al.  Fire history at the forest-grassland ecotone in southwestern Montana. , 1983 .

[10]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data : principles and practices , 1998 .

[11]  S. Ustin.  Remote sensing for natural resource management and environmental monitoring , 2004 .

[12]  N. Benson,et al.  Landscape Assessment: Ground measure of severity, the Composite Burn Index; and Remote sensing of severity, the Normalized Burn Ratio , 2006 .

[13]  David L. Verbyla,et al.  Landscape-level interactions of prefire vegetation, burn severity, and postfire vegetation over a 16-year period in interior Alaska , 2005 .

[14]  A. Huete,et al.  A Modified Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index , 1994 .

[15]  Christophe Sannier,et al.  Strategic monitoring of crop yields and rangeland conditions in Southern Africa and remote sensing , 2000 .

[16]  S. Running,et al.  Remote Sensing of Forest Fire Severity and Vegetation Recovery , 1996 .

[17]  José M. C. Pereira,et al.  A comparative evaluation of NOAA/AVHRR vegetation indexes for burned surface detection and mapping , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[18]  Jay E. Anderson,et al.  A COMPARISON OF THREE METHODS FOR ESTIMATING PLANT COVER , 1987 .

[19]  Dominique Gillon,et al.  Combustion and Nutrient Losses During Laboratory Burns , 1995 .

[20]  S. Whisenant.  Changing fire frequencies on Idaho's Snake River Plains: ecological and management implications. , 1990 .

[21]  Jay D. Miller,et al.  Quantifying burn severity in a heterogeneous landscape with a relative version of the delta Normalized Burn Ratio (dNBR) , 2007 .

[22]  D. Verbyla,et al.  Evaluation of remotely sensed indices for assessing burn severity in interior Alaska using Landsat TM and ETM , 2005 .

[23]  Martin J. Wooster,et al.  Testing the potential of multi-spectral remote sensing for retrospectively estimating fire severity in African savannahs , 2005 .

[24]  V. Caselles,et al.  Mapping burns and natural reforestation using thematic Mapper data , 1991 .

[25]  Tobias Landmann,et al.  Remote sensing of vegetation fires and its contribution to a fire management information system , 2004 .

[26]  Keith T. Weber,et al.  Challenges of Integrating Geospatial Technologies Into Rangeland Research and Management , 2006 .

[27]  D. Opitz,et al.  Classifying and mapping wildfire severity : A comparison of methods , 2005 .

[28]  X. Pons,et al.  A semi-automatic methodology to detect fire scars in shrubs and evergreen forests with Landsat MSS time series , 2000 .

[29]  J. W. Wagtendonk,et al.  Comparison of AVIRIS and Landsat ETM+ detection capabilities for burn severity , 2004 .

[30]  J. E. Anderson,et al.  A new point interception frame for estimating cover of vegetation , 2004, Vegetatio.

[31]  David P. Roy,et al.  Remote sensing of fire severity: assessing the performance of the normalized burn ratio , 2006, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[32]  José U. Paúl,et al.  Comparative study of vegetation indices to assess land cover change after forest fires , 1999, Remote Sensing.

[33]  A. Smith,et al.  Production of Landsat ETM+ reference imagery of burned areas within Southern African savannahs: comparison of methods and application to MODIS , 2007 .

[34]  Lorraine Remer,et al.  Detection of forests using mid-IR reflectance: an application for aerosol studies , 1994, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[35]  Carl H. Key,et al.  Landscape Assessment ( LA ) Sampling and Analysis Methods , 2004 .

[36]  G. Foody.  Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data: Principles and Practices , 2010 .

[37]  Mark W. Patterson,et al.  Mapping Fire-Induced Vegetation Mortality Using Landsat Thematic Mapper Data: A Comparison of Linear Transformation Techniques , 1998 .

[38]  John A. Richards,et al.  Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis , 1986 .

[39]  D. Roy.  Multi-temporal active-fire based burn scar detection algorithm , 1999 .

[40]  S. A. Lewis,et al.  Remote sensing techniques to assess active fire characteristics and post-fire effects , 2006 .

[41]  Alfonso Calera,et al.  Application of remote sensing and GIS to locate priority intervention areas after wildland fires in Mediterranean systems: a case study from south-eastern Spain , 2004 .

[42]  A. Huete.  A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI) , 1988 .

[43]  P. Fulé,et al.  Comparison of burn severity assessments using Differenced Normalized Burn Ratio and ground data , 2005 .

[44]  G. Asner,et al.  Spectral unmixing of vegetation, soil and dry carbon cover in arid regions: Comparing multispectral and hyperspectral observations , 2002 .

[45]  Steven S. Seefeldt.  Consequences of Selecting Rambouillet Ewes for Mountain Big Sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana) Dietary Preference , 2005 .

[46]  Jérôme Théau,et al.  Effect of coregistration error on patchy target detection using high-resolution imagery , 2008 .

[47]  Didier Tanré,et al.  Atmospherically resistant vegetation index (ARVI) for EOS-MODIS , 1992, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[48]  Matthew G. Rollins,et al.  Mapping Fire Regimes Across Time and Space: Understanding Coarse and Fine-scale Fire Patterns , 2001 .

[49]  Jay D. Miller,et al.  Mapping forest post-fire canopy consumption in several overstory types using multi-temporal Landsat TM and ETM data , 2002 .

[50]  W. Hargrove,et al.  Effects of fire on landscape heterogeneity in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming , 1994 .