Construction Learning as a Function of Frequency, Frequency Distribution, and Function.

This article considers effects of construction frequency, form, function, and prototypicality on second language acquisition (SLA). It investigates these relationships by focusing on naturalistic SLA in the European Science Foundation corpus ( Perdue, 1993 ) of the English verb–argument constructions (VACs): verb locative (VL), verb object locative (VOL), and ditransitive (VOO). Goldberg (2006) argued that Zipfian type/token frequency distributions ( Zipf, 1935 ) in natural language constructions might optimize learning by providing one very high-frequency exemplar that is also prototypical in meaning. This article tests and confirms this proposal for naturalistic English as a second language. We show that VAC type/token distribution in the input is Zipfian and that learners first use the most frequent, prototypical, and generic exemplar (e.g., put in the VOL VAC, give in the VOO ditransitive, etc.). Learning is driven by the frequency and frequency distribution of exemplars within constructions and by the match of their meaning to the construction prototype. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[1]  Marianne Starren,et al.  The European Science Foundation’s Second Language Database , 1996 .

[2]  M. Posner,et al.  On the genesis of abstract ideas. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  Anderson,et al.  LEVv The Effects of Category Generalizations and Instance Similarity on Schema Abstraction , 2022 .

[4]  George Kingsley Zipf,et al.  Human behavior and the principle of least effort , 1949 .

[5]  G. Kennedy.  Amplifier Collocations in the British National Corpus: Implications for English Language Teaching , 2003 .

[6]  Peter Gordon,et al.  Korean Speakers' Acquisition of the English Ditransitive Construction: The Role of Verb Prototype, Input Distribution, and Frequency , 2009 .

[7]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Language as shaped by the brain. , 2008, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[8]  R. Langacker.  Foundations of cognitive grammar , 1983 .

[9]  Martin J. Pickering.  The dance of dialogue , 2006 .

[10]  Nick C. Ellis,et al.  Constructions, Chunking, and Connectionism: The Emergence of Second Language Structure , 2008 .

[11]  L. Allan.  A note on measurement of contingency between two binary variables in judgment tasks , 1980 .

[12]  Martin J. Pickering,et al.  Alignment as the Basis for Successful Communication , 2006 .

[13]  Nick C. Ellis,et al.  Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition , 2008 .

[14]  David R. Shanks,et al.  The Psychology of Associative Learning , 1995 .

[15]  N. Ellis.  Language Acquisition as Rational Contingency Learning , 2006 .

[16]  S. Gass,et al.  Input, Interaction and Output: An Overview , 2006 .

[17]  A. Ninio.  Pathbreaking verbs in syntactic development and the question of prototypical transitivity , 1999, Journal of Child Language.

[18]  John Sinclair,et al.  Corpus, Concordance, Collocation , 1991 .

[19]  M. Tomasello.  First Verbs: A Case Study of Early Grammatical Development , 1994 .

[20]  R. Mizen.  The embodied mind. , 2009, The Journal of analytical psychology.

[21]  Clive Perdue,et al.  Adult language acquisition : cross-linguistic perspectives , 1993 .

[22]  S. Gass.  Input and Interaction , 2008 .

[23]  E. Rosch.  Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories. , 1975 .

[24]  Brian MacWhinney,et al.  The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk: Transcription format and programs, Vol. 1, 3rd ed. , 2000 .

[25]  John R. Anderson,et al.  The effects of information order and learning mode on schema abstraction , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[26]  Nick C. Ellis,et al.  The Psycholinguistics of the Interaction Hypothesis. , 2008 .

[27]  B. MacWhinney.  The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk , 1992 .

[28]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[29]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind , 1988 .

[30]  Susan M. Gass,et al.  Input, Interaction, and Second Language Production , 1994, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[31]  Brian MacWhinney,et al.  The Talkbank Project , 2007 .

[32]  S. Gries,et al.  Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on `alternations' , 2004 .

[33]  Susan M. Gass,et al.  Pushing the methodological boundaries in interaction research:an introduction to the special issue , 2006 .

[34]  Diane Larsen-Freeman,et al.  Language as a Complex Adaptive System , 2009 .

[35]  M. Posner,et al.  Retention of Abstract Ideas. , 1970 .

[36]  Anat Ninio,et al.  Language and the Learning Curve: A New Theory of Syntactic Development , 2006 .

[37]  G. Murphy,et al.  The Big Book of Concepts , 2002 .

[38]  George Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things , 1987 .

[39]  N. Ellis.  Cognitive Perspectives on SLA: The Associative-Cognitive CREED , 2006 .

[40]  Adele E. Goldberg.  Constructions: a new theoretical approach to language , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[41]  Sylviane Granger,et al.  Prefabricated patterns in advanced EFL writing: collocations and formulae , 1998 .

[42]  S. Pinker.  Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure , 1989 .

[43]  A. Goldberg.  Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language , 2006 .

[44]  Stefan Th. Gries,et al.  Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions , 2003 .

[45]  Caroline F Rowland,et al.  Semantic generality, input frequency and the acquisition of syntax. , 2004, Journal of child language.

[46]  Luc Steels,et al.  Language as a Complex Adaptive System , 2000, PPSN.

[47]  Wolfgang Klein,et al.  The Acquisition of Temporality in a Second Language , 1995 .

[48]  N. Ellis.  Emergentism, Connectionism, and Language Learning. , 1998 .

[49]  Lourdes Ortega,et al.  LONGITUDINAL RESEARCH IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION: RECENT TRENDS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 2005, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.

[50]  Stefanie Wulff,et al.  The acquisition of tense-aspect: Converging evidence from corpora and telicity ratings , 2009 .

[51]  G. Zipf.  The Psycho-Biology Of Language: AN INTRODUCTION TO DYNAMIC PHILOLOGY , 1999 .

[52]  Florian Coulmas,et al.  The Compliment Formula , 1981 .

[53]  Adele E. Goldberg,et al.  Learning argument structure generalizations , 2004 .

[54]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  Sampling children's spontaneous speech: how much is enough? , 2004, Journal of child language.

[55]  G. Lakoff.  Women, fire, and dangerous things : what categories reveal about the mind , 1989 .

[56]  Diane E. Beals,et al.  The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk: Vol. 1. Transcription format and programs; Vol. 2. The database (3rd ed.). B. MacWhinney. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2000. Pp. 366 (Vol. 1); Pp. 418 (Vol. 2). , 2002, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[57]  Michael H. Long.  INPUT, INTERACTION, AND SECOND‐LANGUAGE ACQUISITION , 1981 .

[58]  R. Langacker.  Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Volume I: Theoretical Prerequisites , 1987 .

[59]  Clive Perdue,et al.  Utterance Structure: Developing grammars again , 1992 .